This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-08-183T entitled 'Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites: Further Actions Needed to Effectively Manage Risks' which was released on October 23, 2007. This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this document to Webmaster@gao.gov. This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this material separately. Testimony: Before the Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment, House Committee on Science and Technology: United States Government Accountability Office: GAO: For Release on Delivery Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT: Tuesday, October 23, 2007: Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites: Further Actions Needed to Effectively Manage Risks: Statement of David A. Powner, Director: Information Technology Management Issues: GOES-R: GAO-08-183T: GAO Highlights: Highlights of GAO-08-183T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on Energy and Environment, House Committee on Science and Technology. Why GAO Did This Study: The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with the aid of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), plans to procure the next generation of geostationary operational environmental satellites, called the Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites-R series (GOES-R). This new series is considered critical to the United States’ ability to maintain the continuity of data required for weather forecasting through the year 2028. GAO was asked to summarize its report being released today on the GOES- R series. This report (1) assesses the status and revised plans for the GOES-R procurement and (2) evaluates whether NOAA is adequately mitigating key technical and programmatic risks facing the program. To conduct this review, GAO analyzed contractor and program data and interviewed officials from NOAA and NASA. What GAO Found: NOAA has made progress in planning its GOES-R procurement—which is estimated to cost $7 billion and scheduled to have the first satellite ready for launch in 2014—but cost and schedules are likely to grow. Specifically, the agency completed preliminary design studies of GOES-R and recently decided to separate the space and ground elements of the program into two separate development contracts. However, this change in strategy has delayed a planned September 2007 decision to proceed with the acquisition. Further, independent estimates are higher than the program’s current cost estimate and convey a low level of confidence in the program’s schedule. Independent studies show that the estimated program could cost about $2 billion more, and the first satellite launch could be delayed by 2 years. As NOAA works to reconcile the independent estimate with its own program office estimate, costs are likely to grow and schedules are likely to be delayed. To address cost, schedule, and technical risks, the GOES-R program has established a risk management program and has taken steps to mitigate selected risks. For example, as of July 2007, the program office identified the lack of an integrated master schedule to be its highest priority risk and established plans to bring this risk to closure. However, more remains to be done to fully address risks. Specifically, the program has multiple risk watchlists that are not always consistent and key risks are missing from the watchlists, including risks associated with unfilled executive positions, limitations in NOAA’s insight into NASA’s deliverables, and insufficient funds for unexpected costs—called management reserves (see table for more details). As a result, the GOES-R program is at risk that problems will not be identified or mitigated in a timely manner and could lead to program cost overruns and schedule delays What GAO Recommends: In its report, GAO is making recommendations to the Secretary of Commerce to improve GOES-R risk management. The Secretary agreed with the recommendations to use a program level risk list and to add selected risks to its list, but disagreed that NOAA has insufficient insight into NASA’s contracts. However, NOAA has not demonstrated that it has validated NASA’s contractor performance and GAO remains concerned that NOAA lacks the capability to oversee this key aspect of the program. Table: Description of Key Risks Missing from GOES-R Risk Lists: Key Risks: Unfilled GOES-R executive leadership positions; Description: Two senior program positions—the system program director and deputy system program director—are currently filled by NASA and NOAA personnel in an acting capacity until they can be permanently filled by NOAA. The agency reported that it plans to fill the deputy system program director role in the near future, but noted that it could take more than 6 months to fill the system program director role. Key Risks: Limitations in NOAA’s insight into NASA’s deliverables; Description: The established NOAA/NASA interagency agreements do not contain provisions that enable NOAA to ensure that monthly contractor data and reports, submitted by NASA, are reliable and that they accurately depict contractor performance. Key Risks: Insufficient management reserve (for unexpected costs) held by the program and a critical instrument contractor; Description: As of May 2007, the contractor for a critical instrument—the Advanced Baseline Imager—had less than 1 percent of funding in reserve to cover unexpected costs associated with the 40 percent of work left to be completed. In addition, as a result of addressing issues on the Advanced Baseline Imager in March 2007, the reserve funding for the overall GOES-R program dropped below 25 percent—a level that NOAA reported it intended to establish as a lesson learned from other satellite acquisitions. As of July 2007, the reserve level was at about 15 percent. Source: GAO analysis. [End of table] To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on [hyperlink, http://www.GAO-08-183T]. For more information, contact David A. Powner at (202) 512-9286 or pownerd@gao.gov. [End of section] Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: We appreciate the opportunity to participate in today's hearing on the planned Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites-R series (GOES-R) program. The GOES-R series is to replace the current series of satellites, which will likely begin to reach the end of their useful lives in approximately 2014. This new series is expected to mark the first major technological advance in GOES instrumentation since 1994. It is also considered critical to the United States' ability to maintain the continuity of data required for weather forecasting through the year 2028. As requested, our testimony summarizes the report we issued today on the GOES-R program. Specifically, we (1) assessed the status and revised plans for the GOES-R procurement and (2) evaluated whether the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) is adequately mitigating key technical and programmatic risks facing the GOES-R program.[Footnote 1] In preparing for this testimony, we relied on our work supporting the accompanying report. That report contains a detailed overview of our scope and methodology. All of the work on which this testimony is based was performed in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards. Results in Brief: NOAA has made progress on its GOES-R procurement--which is estimated to cost $7 billion and scheduled to have the first satellite ready for launch in 2014--but costs and schedules are likely to grow. Specifically, NOAA completed preliminary design studies of its GOES-R acquisition and planned to make a decision to proceed to development and production in September 2007. In addition, the agency recently decided to separate the space and ground elements of the program into two separate contracts to be managed by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and NOAA, respectively. However, this change in the GOES-R acquisition strategy has delayed the decision to proceed with the acquisition. Further, independent estimates are higher than the program's current cost estimate and convey a low level of confidence in the program's schedule. Independent studies show that the estimated program could cost about $2 billion more, and the first satellite launch could be delayed by 2 years. As NOAA works to reconcile the independent estimate with its own program office estimate, costs are likely to grow and schedules are likely to be delayed. However, NOAA officials stated that while their reconciliation process is still ongoing, the revised cost estimate will likely be $1 billion more than the current $7 billion and the first satellite launch will likely be delayed 1 year from 2014, rather than 2 years. To address cost, schedule, and technical risks, the GOES-R program has established a risk management program and has taken steps to identify and mitigate selected risks. For example, as of July 2007, the program office identified the lack of an integrated master schedule as its highest priority risk. It also identified other risks including technical challenges affecting the development of a critical instrument and the development of requirements between the space and ground segments. The program has also established plans for bringing these risks to closure. However, more remains to be done to fully address risks. Specifically, the program has multiple risk watchlists that are not always consistent. Further, key risks are missing from the risks lists, including risks associated with unfilled executive positions, limitations in NOAA's insight into NASA's deliverables, and insufficient funds for unexpected costs (called management reserve). As a result, the program is at risk that problems will not be identified or mitigated in a timely manner and could lead to program cost overruns and schedule delays. To improve NOAA's ability to effectively manage the GOES-R procurement, in our report being released today, we are making recommendations to ensure that the GOES-R program office manages, mitigates, and reports on risks using a more comprehensive program-level risk list. In written comments, the Secretary of Commerce agreed with our recommendations to use a program level risk list and to add selected risks to its list, but disagreed that NOAA has insufficient insight into NASA's contracts. The Secretary cited an unparalleled transparency between the two agencies. However, NOAA has not demonstrated that it has validated NASA's contractor performance and we remain concerned that NOAA lacks the capability to oversee this important aspect of the program. Given the past problems NOAA had in obtaining insight into NASA's contracts and the importance of this interagency relationship to the success of the GOES-R program, we believe that this issue should be managed and monitored as a risk. Background: Since the 1960s, geostationary and polar-orbiting environmental satellites have been used by the United States to provide meteorological data for weather observation, research, and forecasting. NOAA's National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (NESDIS) is responsible for managing the civilian geostationary and polar-orbiting satellite systems as two separate programs, called GOES and the Polar Operational Environmental Satellites, respectively. Unlike polar-orbiting satellites, which constantly circle the earth in a relatively low polar orbit, geostationary satellites can maintain a constant view of the earth from a high orbit of about 22,300 miles in space. NOAA operates GOES as a two-satellite system that is primarily focused on the United States. These satellites are uniquely positioned to provide timely environmental data to meteorologists and their audiences on the earth's atmosphere, its surface, cloud cover, and the space environment. They also observe the development of hazardous weather, such as hurricanes and severe thunderstorms, and track their movement and intensity to reduce or avoid major losses of property and life. Furthermore, the satellites' ability to provide broad, continuously updated coverage of atmospheric conditions over land and oceans is important to NOAA's weather forecasting operations. To provide continuous satellite coverage, NOAA acquires several geostationary satellites at a time as part of a series and launches new satellites every few years (see table 1). Table 1: Summary of the Procurement History of GOES: Series name: Original GOES[C]; Procurement duration[A]: 1970-1987; Satellites[B]: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7. Series name: GOES I-M; Procurement duration[A]: 1985-2001; Satellites[B]: 8, 9, 10, 11, 12. Series name: GOES-N; Procurement duration[A]: 1998-2011; Satellites[B]: 13, O, P, Q[D]. Series name: GOES-R; Procurement duration[A]: 2007-2016; Satellites[B]: R, S. Source: GAO analysis of NOAA data. [A] Duration includes time from contract award to final satellite launch. [B] Satellites in a series are identified by letters of the alphabet when they are on the ground and by numbers once they are in orbit. [C] The procurement of these satellites consisted of four separate contracts for (1) two early prototype satellites and GOES-1, (2) GOES- 2 and -3, (3) GOES-4 through -6, and (4) GOES-G (failed on launch) and GOES-7. [D] NOAA decided not to exercise the option for this satellite. [End of table] Three satellites--GOES-11, GOES-12, and GOES-13--are currently in orbit. Both GOES-11 and GOES-12 are operational satellites, while GOES- 13 is in an on-orbit storage mode. It is a backup for the other two satellites should they experience any degradation in service. The others in the series, GOES-O and GOES-P, are planned for launch over the next few years. NOAA is also planning the next generation of satellites, known as the GOES-R series, which are planned for launch beginning in 2014. GOES-R Program--An Overview: NOAA plans for the GOES-R program to improve on the technology of prior series, in terms of both system and instrument improvements, to fulfill more demanding user requirements and to provide more rapid information updates. Table 2 highlights key system-related improvements GOES-R is expected to make to the geostationary satellite program. Table 2: Summary of Key GOES-R System Improvements: Key feature: Total number of products; GOES-N (current): 41; GOES-R: ~68-120. Key feature: Downlink rate of raw data collected by instruments (from satellite to ground stations); GOES-N (current): 2.6 Mbps; GOES-R: 70 Mbps. Key feature: Broadcast rate of processed GOES data (from satellite to users); GOES-N (current): 2.1 Mbps; GOES-R: 40 Mbps. Key feature: Raw data storage (the length of time that raw data will be stored at ground stations); GOES-N (current): 0 days; GOES-R: 3 days. Source: GAO analysis of NOAA data. [End of table] In addition to the system improvements, the instruments on the GOES-R series are expected to significantly increase the clarity and precision of the observed environmental data. NOAA originally planned to acquire six different types of instruments. Furthermore, two of these instruments--the Advanced Baseline Imager and the Hyperspectral Environmental Suite--were considered to be the most critical because they would provide data for key weather products. Table 3 summarizes the originally planned instruments and their expected capabilities. Table 3: Originally Planned GOES-R Series Instruments, as of August 2006: Planned instrument: Advanced Baseline Imager (ABI); Description: Expected to provide variable area imagery and radiometric information of the earth's surface, atmosphere, and cloud cover. Key features include: * monitoring and tracking severe weather; * providing images of clouds to support forecasts, and: * providing higher resolution, faster coverage, and broader coverage simultaneously. Planned instrument: Hyperspectral Environmental Suite (HES)[A]; Description: Expected to provide information about the earth's surface to aid in the prediction of weather and climate monitoring. Key features include: * providing atmospheric moisture and temperature profiles to support forecasts and climate monitoring; * monitoring coastal regions for ecosystem health, water quality, coastal erosion, and harmful algal blooms, and: * providing higher resolution and faster coverage. Planned instrument: Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM); Description: Expected to continuously monitor lightning activity over the United States and provide a more complete dataset than previously possible. Key features include: * detecting lightning strikes as an indicator of severe storms and: * providing a new capability to GOES that only previously existed on polar satellites. Planned instrument: Magnetometer; Description: Expected to provide information on the general level of geomagnetic activity, monitor current systems in space, and permit detection of magnetopause crossings, sudden storm commencements, and substorms. Planned instrument: Space Environmental In-Situ Suite (SEISS); Description: Expected to provide information on space weather to aid in the prediction of particle precipitation, which causes disturbance and disruption of radio communications and navigation systems. Key features include: * measuring magnetic fields and charged particles; * providing improved heavy ion detection, adding low energy electrons and protons, and: * enabling early warnings for satellite and power grid operation, telecom services, astronauts, and airlines. Planned instrument: Solar Imaging Suite (SIS)[B]; Description: Expected to provide coverage of the entire dynamic range of solar X-ray features, from coronal holes to X-class flares, as well as estimate the measure of temperature and emissions. Key features include: * providing images of the sun and measuring solar output to monitor solar storms and: * providing improved imager capability. Source: GAO analysis of NOAA data. [A] HES was cancelled in September 2006. [B] SIS development work was divided into two separate acquisitions, the Solar Ultra Violet Imager and the Extreme Ultraviolet and X-Ray Irradiance Suite. [End of table] More recently, however, NOAA reduced the scope of the GOES-R program because of expectations of higher costs. In May 2006, the program office projected that total costs, which were originally estimated to be $6.2 billion, could reach $11.4 billion. We reported that this led NOAA to reduce the scope and technical complexity of the baseline program.[Footnote 2] Specifically, in September 2006, NOAA reduced the minimum number of satellites from four to two, cancelled plans for developing the Hyperspectral Environmental Suite, and estimated the revised program would cost $7 billion. Table 4 provides a summary of the timeline and scope of these key changes. Table 4: Key Changes to the GOES-R Program: Number of satellites; Baseline program, as of August 2006: 4; Program with reduced scope, as of September 2006: 2. Planned instruments; Baseline program, as of August 2006: 2 critical instruments and 4 noncritical instruments or instrument suites: Critical instruments: * Advanced Baseline Imager; * Hyperspectral Environmental Suite; Noncritical instruments/suites: * Geostationary Lightning Mapper; * Magnetometer; * Space Environmental In-Situ Suite; * Solar Imaging Suite; Program with reduced scope, as of September 2006: 1 critical instrument and 4 noncritical instruments or instrument suites: Critical instrument: Advanced Baseline Imager; Noncritical instruments/suites: * Geostationary Lightning Mapper; * Magnetometer; * Space Environmental In-Situ Suite; * Two components of the former Solar Imaging Suite (the Solar Ultra Violet Imager and Extreme Ultraviolet and X-Ray Irradiance Suite). Life-cycle cost estimate (in then year dollars); Baseline program, as of August 2006: $6.2-11.4 billion; Program with reduced scope, as of September 2006: $7 billion. End of operations and maintenance; Baseline program, as of August 2006: 2028; Program with reduced scope, as of September 2006: 2028[A]. Source: GAO analysis of NOAA data. [A] All satellites are expected to have a 15-year lifespan (5 years in on-orbit storage plus 10 years in operation). [End of table] GOES-R Program Office Structure: NOAA is solely responsible for GOES-R program funding and overall mission success. However, since it relies on NASA's acquisition experience and technical expertise to help ensure the success of its programs, NOAA implemented an integrated program management structure with NASA for the GOES-R program. Within the program office, there are two project offices that manage key components of the GOES-R system. These are called the flight and operations project offices. The flight project office oversees the spacecraft, instruments, and launch services. The operations project office oversees the ground elements and on-orbit operations of the satellites. The project manager for the flight project office and the deputy project manager for operations project office are designated to be filled with NASA personnel. Additionally, NOAA has located the program office at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center. Planned GOES-R Acquisition Strategy: NOAA's acquisition strategy was to award contracts for the preliminary design of the GOES-R system to several vendors who would subsequently compete for the contract to be the single prime contractor responsible for overall system development and production. As such, in October 2005, NOAA awarded contracts for the preliminary design of the overall GOES-R system to three vendors.[Footnote 3] In addition, to reduce the risks associated with developing technically advanced instruments, NASA awarded contracts for the preliminary designs for five of the originally planned instruments. NASA expected to subsequently award development contracts for these instruments and to eventually turn them over to the prime contractor responsible for the overall GOES-R program. GOES-R Preliminary Design Studies Are Completed, but Key Program Changes Have Been Made and Cost and Schedule Estimates Are Likely to Grow: NOAA has completed preliminary design studies of its GOES-R procurement. In addition, the agency recently decided to separate the space and ground elements of the program into two separate contracts to be managed by NASA and NOAA, respectively. However, this change has delayed a key decision to proceed with the acquisition, which was planned for September 2007. Further, independent estimates are higher than the program's current $7 billion cost estimate and convey a low level of confidence in the program's schedule for launching the first satellite by 2014. As NOAA works to reconcile the independent estimate with its own program office estimate, costs are likely to grow and schedules are likely to be delayed. Progress Has Been Made on GOES-R Procurement Activities: NOAA and NASA have made progress on GOES-R. The program office has completed preliminary design studies of the overall GOES-R system and has initiated development work on most of the planned instruments. Specifically, the NOAA-issued contracts for the preliminary design of the overall GOES-R system to three vendors have ended, and the designs have been completed. In addition, after completing preliminary designs on five of the originally planned instruments, NASA awarded development contracts for three of them.[Footnote 4] Further, the most critical of these instruments--the Advanced Baseline Imager--has completed a major development milestone. In February 2007, it passed a critical design review gate and NASA approved the contractor to begin production of a prototype model. NOAA Revised its Acquisition Strategy: NOAA recently made a number of key changes in how it plans to acquire the GOES-R system. Originally, NOAA planned to award and manage a single prime contract for the acquisition and operation of the integrated system. However, an independent review team assessed the program and found that this approach was risky.[Footnote 5] It recommended that NOAA split the acquisition effort into two separate contracts for the space and ground segments and have NASA manage the space segment. The independent review team concluded that there was less risk in continuing with this approach than there would be if NOAA took on a new and expanded role. In March 2007, Commerce approved NOAA's decision to implement these recommendations. The agency revised its acquisition strategy to include two separate contracts--the space segment and the ground segment. The two contracts are expected to be awarded in May 2008 and August 2008, respectively. The space segment is to be managed by a NASA-led flight project office. As such, NASA is to be responsible for awarding and managing the space segment contract, delivering the flight-ready instruments to the space segment contractor for integration onto the satellites, and overseeing the systems engineering and integration. NOAA is to be responsible for the ground segment contract, which is to be managed by the NOAA-led operations project office. The revised acquisition strategy has delayed NOAA's plans to complete a key decision milestone on whether to proceed with GOES-R development and production in September 2007. Once this decision is made, the final requests for proposals on the system segments are to be released. The agency could not provide a timeframe for when this key decision milestone would take place. GOES-R Cost Estimates Are Likely to Grow and Schedule Estimates Are Likely to Slip: NOAA's current estimate that the life cycle cost of the GOES-R program would be $7 billion is likely to grow, and its estimate that the first satellite would be launched in December 2014 is likely to slip. Consistent with best practices in cost estimating, in May 2007, NOAA had two different cost estimates completed for the current GOES-R program--one by its program office and one by an independent cost estimating firm. The program office estimated with 80 percent confidence that the program would cost $6.9 billion. The independent estimating firm estimated with 80 percent confidence that the program would cost $9.3 billion. A comparison of the two cost models shows that the independent estimator has about a 20 percent level of confidence that the program can be completed for $6.9 billion. Further, the independent estimator concluded that the program office estimate significantly understated the risk of cost overruns. Other major differences between the two estimates are contained in government costs and in the space and ground segments. In commenting on a draft of the accompanying report, NOAA officials noted that one of the differences between the estimates is the inflation rate. The independent estimator assumed a higher inflation rate than the rate that NOAA and NASA typically use. NOAA officials noted that if the independent estimate was adjusted to NOAA's inflation rate, the program's cost estimate--with 80 percent confidence--would be $8.7 billion. However, we believe that the value of an independent estimate is that it does not necessarily use the same assumptions as the program office. By offering alternative assumptions, the independent estimate provides valuable information for government officials to consider when revising program cost estimates. Program officials are reconciling the two different cost estimates and plan to establish a new program cost estimate to be released in conjunction with the President's fiscal year 2009 budget in February 2008. Program officials were unable to provide us information on the reconciled estimate until it is released. Nonetheless, the revised cost estimate will likely be $1 billion more than the current $7 billion. Regarding schedule, NOAA's current plan to launch the first GOES-R series satellite in December 2014 could be delayed. This schedule was driven by a requirement that the satellites be available to back up the last remaining GOES satellites (GOES-O and GOES-P) should anything go wrong during the planned launches of these satellites (see table 5). However, as part of its cost estimate, the independent estimator performed a schedule risk analysis. The independent estimator determined that there was less than a 50 percent chance that the first satellite would be ready for launch by December 2014 and that a later date would be more realistic. The estimator determined that it had 50 percent confidence that the first satellite would launch by October 2015 and 80 percent confidence that the satellite would launch by March 2017. A delay of this magnitude could affect the continuity of GOES data should the agency experience problems with the predecessor satellites. Table 5: GOES-R Program Launch Schedule, as of July 2007: Milestone: GOES-O launch[A]; Planned date: April 2008. Milestone: GOES-P launch[A]; Planned date: April 2009. Milestone: GOES-R satellite available for launch; Planned date: Dec. 2014. Milestone: GOES-S satellite available for launch; Planned date: April 2016. Source: NOAA. [A] GOES-O and GOES-P are not part of the GOES-R series program. Their launch dates are provided because of their relevance to the GOES-R series satellite schedules. [End of table] NOAA is Taking Steps to Address Key Risks, but More Remains to Be Done: To address cost, schedule, and technical risks, the GOES-R program established a risk management program and has taken steps to identify and mitigate selected risks. However, more remains to be done to fully address a comprehensive set of risks. Specifically, the program has multiple risk watchlists and they are not always consistent. Further, key risks are missing from the risks lists, including risks associated with unfilled executive positions, limitations in NOAA's insight into NASA's deliverables, and insufficient funding for unexpected costs (called management reserve) on a critical sensor. As a result, the GOES- R program is at increased risk that problems will not be identified or mitigated in a timely manner and that they could lead to program cost overruns and schedule delays. GOES-R Has a Risk Management Program and Is Taking Measures to Address Selected Risks: The GOES-R program office established a risk management program and is tracking and mitigating selected risks. Risk management is a leading management practice that is widely recognized as a key component of a sound system development approach. An effective risk management approach typically includes identifying, prioritizing, and mitigating risks, and escalating key risks to the attention of senior management. In accordance with leading management practices, the GOES-R program identifies risks, assigns a severity rating to risks, tracks these risks in a database, plans response strategies for each risk in the database, and reviews and evaluates these risks during monthly program risk management board meetings. Programwide and project-specific risks are managed by different offices. The program office identifies and tracks programwide risks--those that affect the overall GOES-R program. NASA's flight project office and NOAA's operations project office manage risks affecting their respective aspects of the program.[Footnote 6] Further, the program office briefs senior executives on top program and project risks on a monthly basis. GOES-R Program Office Identified and Is Working to Mitigate Programwide Risks: As of July 2007, the program office identified three program risks affecting the overall GOES-R program. These risks include the development of the integrated master schedule, the ability to secure authorization to use a key frequency band to meet the space-to-ground communication data link requirements for the GOES-R system, and the final approval of the GOES-R mission requirements from the NOAA Deputy Undersecretary. NOAA is working to mitigate and close program risks that it is tracking. For example, the program office recently closed the risk associated with GOES-R requirements because it had sufficiently defined and obtained approval of these requirements. As another example, the program office considers the lack of an integrated master schedule to be its highest priority risk. Program officials reported that completion of the integrated master schedule is driven by the completion of the intermediate schedules for the ground segment and the space-to-ground interdependencies. Key program staff members, including a resident scheduler, meet on a weekly basis to resolve outstanding design issues and hone these schedules. Program officials reported that the intermediate schedules are near completion and that they plan to have the integrated master schedule completed in Fall 2007. They expect to remove this issue from the risk watchlist at that time. NASA Identified Flight Segment Risks and Is Working to Mitigate Them: As of July 2007, the NASA flight project office identified four risks affecting instrument development, all of which are classified as medium risk. The top three risks pertain to the advanced imaging instrument, ABI--including issues on timely and quality subcontractor delivery of a critical part, stray light negatively impacting the performance of the optical system, and meeting specified performance requirements on image navigation and registration. The fourth priority risk pertains to the improvement of subcontractor quality assurance on a key sensor for the Space Environmental In-Situ Suite. NASA is working to mitigate the flight segment risks that it is tracking. For example, the ABI contractor, among other things, plans to complete a key simulation review before the end of the year (called the structural thermal optical performance analysis) to evaluate whether the instrument can meet its expected performance parameters for image navigation and registration. NASA also recently conducted a vendor facility assessment of the Space Environmental In-Situ Suite subcontractor to determine whether adequate quality assurance improvements had been made to be compliant with contract requirements. These actions are expected to help mitigate the risk. NOAA Identified Risks in its Operations Segment and Is Working to Mitigate Them: As of July 2007, the NOAA operations project office identified five risks impacting the management and development of the ground system and operations, including one that is identified as a medium risk. These risks include, among other things, inadequate definition of flight and operations project interdependencies, algorithm development responsibilities, and the adequate definition of coordination requirements between the space and ground segments to ensure that the two requests for proposals are consistent. NOAA is working to mitigate the ground system and operations risks that it is tracking. For example, for the highest priority risk regarding schedule interdependencies, key staff from both the flight and operations projects meet weekly in order to identify and synchronize project schedules. The project office expects to close this risk in Fall 2007. Multiple Watchlists Are Not Consistent, Making it Difficult to Prioritize and Manage Risks: While GOES-R has implemented a risk management process, its multiple risk watchlists are not consistent in areas where there are interdependencies between the lists, which makes it difficult to effectively prioritize and manage risks at the appropriate organizational levels. Sound risk management practices call for having a consistent prioritization approach and for significant problems to be elevated from the component level to the program level. This is because an issue affecting a critical component could have severe programmatic implications and should be identified, tracked, and overseen at the program level. In addition, program executives should be briefed regularly on the status of key risks. However, on the GOES-R program, the risks identified on the multiple risk lists are inconsistent in areas where there are interdependencies between the lists. These interdependencies include situations where a risk is raised by one project office and affects the other project office, but is not identified by the other project office or elevated to the program level risk list. They also include situations where a risk identified by a project office has programwide implications, but is not elevated to the program level risk list. For example, the operations project office identified schedule interdependencies between the flight and operations project offices as a medium criticality risk, but neither the flight project office nor the program identified this risk even though it is relevant to both. As another example, the operations project office identified the ground procurement schedule as a major issue in its briefing to senior management, but this risk was not identified on its own or on the programwide risk lists. In addition, while the three offices brief senior management about their key risks on a monthly basis, selected risks may not be accurately depicted in these briefings because of the inconsistencies among the risk watchlists. For example, both the flight and operations project offices identified technical development issues as minor to moderate risk areas, but the program office did not identify this item as a risk and, when it briefed senior management, it noted that technical development was in good shape. Figure 1 depicts examples of inconsistencies among risk lists and briefings to senior management. The lack of consistency in managing risks in areas where there are interdependencies makes it difficult to ensure that all identified risks are appropriately prioritized and managed. This situation hampers the program office's ability to identify and mitigate risks early on and to anticipate and manage the impact of risks on other areas of the program. Figure 1: Examples of Inconsistencies among GOES-R Risk Watchlists, as of July 2007: [See PDF for image] GAO analysis of NASA and NOAA data. [End of figure] Important GOES-R Management Risks Are Missing from the Program Watchlist: To be effective, a risk management program should have a comprehensive list of risks. However, several key risks that impact the GOES-R procurement and merit agency attention are not identified in the program's risk lists. These risks include (1) key leadership positions that need to be filled, (2) NOAA's limited insight into NASA's deliverables, and (3) insufficient management reserves (held by the program and a key instrument contractor). At the conclusion of our review for the accompanying report, program officials stated that they are aware of these issues and are working to monitor them or address them, as warranted. Nevertheless, until these and other programwide risks are identified and addressed as part of a comprehensive risk management program, there is increased likelihood that issues will be overlooked that could affect the acquisition of the GOES-R system. Key GOES-R Leadership Positions Need to be Filled: The two senior GOES-R program positions--the system program director and deputy system program director--are currently filled by NASA and NOAA personnel in an acting capacity until they can be permanently filled by NOAA. In addition, the acting system program director is not able to work full time in this role because she is also on a special assignment as the NESDIS Deputy Assistant Administrator for Systems. NOAA reported that it plans to fill the deputy system program director role in the near future, but noted that it could take more than 6 months to fill the system program director role. Given the approach of the development phase of the GOES-R acquisition and the competing priorities of the acting system program director, it is especially important that these key leadership positions be filled quickly. At the conclusion of our review, agency officials stated that they are aware of this issue and are working to fill the positions, but they did not believe the issue warranted inclusion on the program level risk watch list. However, without the senior level attention inherent in a sound risk management program, it is not clear that NOAA is sufficiently focused on the importance of establishing knowledgeable and committed program executives, or in moving quickly to fill these critical positions. NOAA's Insight into NASA's Program Elements Is Limited: NOAA's March 2007 decision to adopt an acquisition management approach similar to prior GOES procurements could make the agency vulnerable to repeating some of the problems experienced in the past. In particular, our work on the GOES I-M series found that NOAA did not have the ability to make quick decisions on problems because portions of the procurement were managed by NASA.[Footnote 7] In fact, NOAA officials originally intended to depart from this approach as a lesson they learned from the GOES I-M acquisition, because it limited the agency's insight and management involvement in the procurement of major elements of the system. The established NOAA/NASA interagency agreements require NASA to submit monthly contractor cost performance reports to NOAA and to alert NOAA should cost and schedule performance drop below certain thresholds. NASA is currently submitting the required reports and has alerted NOAA on major cost and schedule changes. However, these interagency agreements do not contain provisions that enable NOAA to ensure that the data and reports are reliable and that they accurately depict contractor performance. To do so would entail NOAA having the ability and means to question and validate data, such as by having direct access to the contractor. NASA and NOAA officials reported that the two agencies are working together with an unparalleled level of transparency and noted that NOAA program staff have access to contractor data and can bring any questions with the data to the relevant NASA staff. However, they acknowledged that this process is not documented and were not able to demonstrate that NOAA staff had questioned contract data and that NASA had facilitated obtaining answers to the questions. By not identifying and mitigating this risk on its program risk list, NOAA increases the likelihood that the GOES-R program will repeat the management and contractor shortfalls that plagued past GOES procurements. Recent Changes on a Key Instrument Have Reduced Program Management Reserve Funds and Limited Contractor Reserve Funds Leave GOES-R Vulnerable to Future Cost Increases: A recent modification to the critical ABI instrument contract increased its cost, thereby reducing the amount of management reserve funds held by the program office for unexpected expenses. In September 2006, we reported that ABI was experiencing technical challenges, that were resulting in cost and schedule overruns. Since then, the contractor continued missing cost and schedule targets--a trend that continued until February 2007. At that time, NASA modified the contract to implement a revised baseline cost and schedule. The added cost of this modification was funded using management reserve funds held by the GOES- R program office.[Footnote 8] As a result, the amount of reserve held by the program office dropped below 25 percent--a level that NOAA reported it intended to establish as a lesson learned from other satellite acquisitions. As of July 2007, the program's reserve level was at about 15 percent. Program officials stated that their revised goal is to maintain between 10 and 15 percent in reserve at the program level. While maintaining a 10 to 15 percent management reserve is on par with other major satellite acquisitions, the depletion of management reserves this early in the GOES-R acquisition raises concerns that there will be insufficient reserves during the challenging development, integration, and testing phases to come. In addition, the contractor for the ABI instrument has a very low level of reserve funding for unexpected costs, which means that any unexpected problems will likely lead to cost growth on the overall GOES- R program. As of May 2007, the contractor was holding less than 1 percent of funding in reserve to cover unexpected costs associated with the 40 percent of work left to be completed. As such, there is a risk that the new baseline could fail due to inadequate reserves to finish the program. This would likely have a diminishing effect on the reserve held by the GOES-R flight project and the program office to cover the costs of a second revised baseline plan. Our prior work on system acquisitions has shown inadequate reserves to be an indicator of poor management performance that could lead to cost overruns.[Footnote 9] Considering that GOES-R has not yet entered the development and production phases, it will be critical for NOAA's senior executive management to aggressively manage this risk. By not identifying, mitigating, and tracking this risk in a programwide risk list, the GOES- R program runs an increased risk that unanticipated issues on the ABI instrument will lead to programwide cost overruns and schedule delays. Implementation of GAO Recommendations Should Improve NOAA's Ability to Effectively Manage the GOES-R Procurement: To improve NOAA's ability to effectively manage the procurement of the GOES-R system, we recommended in our accompanying report[Footnote 10] that the Secretary of Commerce direct the Undersecretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere to take the following two actions: * Ensure that the GOES-R program office manages, mitigates, and reports on risks using a program-level risk list that is reconciled with and includes risks from its flight and operations project offices that could impact the overall program. * Include the following risks on the programwide risk list, develop plans to mitigate them, and report to senior executives on progress in mitigating them: - unfilled or temporary GOES-R program leadership positions, - insufficient program insight on NASA contract performance, and: - insufficient management reserve on the critical Advanced Baseline Imager instrument and at the GOES-R program level. In written comments, Commerce agreed with our recommendations to use a program level risk list and to add selected risks to its list. The department reported that NOAA has established a consolidated programwide risk list that is to be used to evaluate risks during monthly internal and external reviews. Further, NOAA acknowledges the risks associated with having unfilled leadership positions and insufficient management reserves and is working to mitigate these risks. However, the department disagreed with our recommendation to manage and mitigate the risk that NOAA has insufficient insight into NASA's contracts. The department cited an unparalleled level of transparency between the two agencies and listed multiple regular meetings that the two agencies hold to ensure close coordination. While an improved working relationship between the two agencies is critical, NOAA has not provided any evidence that it has been able to effectively question and validate data on NASA's contractor performance. Given the past problems that NOAA has experienced in obtaining insight into NASA's contracts and the importance of this interagency relationship to the success of the GOES-R program, we believe that this issue should be managed and monitored as a risk. NOAA also requested that we acknowledge its effort to reconcile its program estimate with the independent estimate and reflect a 20 percent possibility that the program could cost $1 billion more than the current estimate of $7 billion, rather than $2 billion more. We acknowledge this in our report; however, the reconciliation effort is not complete and NOAA did not provide us with a reconciled estimate. In summary, although NOAA has made progress in the GOES-R procurement, changes in the GOES-R acquisition strategy could lead to cost overruns and schedule delays if not managed effectively. Over the last year, NOAA has completed preliminary design studies of its GOES-R system and decided to separate the space and ground elements of the program into two contracts and have NASA oversee the system integration effort. Current program plans call for a two-satellite program--estimated to cost about $7 billion--with launch of the first satellite in December 2014. However, independent studies show that the program's cost could increase by about $2 billion and that the first launch could be delayed by at least 2 years. NOAA has taken steps to identify and address key risks but more could be done to effectively manage risks from a programwide perspective. In particular, the program has multiple risk watchlists that are not consistent in areas where there are interdependencies and key risks have not been elevated for programwide attention. Also, several risks that warrant NOAA's attention have not been placed on any watchlist. Specifically, the top two leadership positions are only temporarily filled; NOAA does not have the ability and means to obtain insight into NASA contracts in order to validate contractor performance data; and insufficient management reserves to handle unexpected problems on a critical instrument and at the program level are likely to affect overall program costs when any unexpected problems arise. Until NOAA manages and addresses a comprehensive set of program risks, the agency's ability to effectively manage the GOES-R acquisition will be significantly weakened and could lead to substantial program overruns and delays. Mr. Chairman, this concludes my statement. I would be happy to answer any questions that you or members of the subcommittee may have at this time. If you have any questions on matters discussed in this testimony, please contact me at (202) 512-9286 or by e-mail at pownerd@gao.gov. Other key contributors to this testimony include Carol Cha, Neil Doherty, Nancy Glover, Colleen Phillips (Assistant Director), and Teresa Smith. [End of section] Footnotes: [1] GAO, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites: Progress Has Been Made, but Improvements Are Needed to Effectively Manage Risks, GAO-08-18 (Washington, D.C.: Oct. 23, 2007). [2] GAO, Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites: Additional Action Needed to Incorporate Lessons Learned from Other Satellite Programs, GAO-06-1129T (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 29, 2006) and Geostationary Operational Environmental Satellites: Steps Remain in Incorporating Lessons Learned from Other Satellite Programs, GAO-06-993 (Washington, D.C.: Sept. 6, 2006). [3] These were called Program Definition and Risk Reduction contracts. [4] NASA has not yet issued a development contract for the Geostationary Lightning Mapper. This contract is expected to be awarded at the end of October 2007. [5] This independent review team, comprised of former senior industry and government space acquisition experts, was hired by NOAA to assess the adequacy of the GOES-R program's management approach, acquisition strategy, and resource availability, among other things. [6] NASA's GOES-R flight project office is responsible for the spacecraft, instruments, and launch services. NOAA's GOES-R operations project office is responsible for the ground elements and on-orbit operations of the satellites. [7] GAO-06-993. [8] This reserve is intended to cover expected costs above those projected by the contractor and unexpected costs in solving problems during a system development program. [9] GAO-06-993. [10] GAO-08-18. GAO's Mission: The Government Accountability Office, the audit, evaluation, and investigative arm of Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's commitment to good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, integrity, and reliability. Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no cost is through GAO's Web site [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov]. Each weekday, GAO posts newly released reports, testimony, and correspondence on its Web site. To have GAO e-mail you a list of newly posted products every afternoon, go to [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov] and select "E-mail Updates." Order by Mail or Phone: The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. Orders should be sent to: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room LM: Washington, DC 20548: To order by Phone: Voice: (202) 512-6000: TDD: (202) 512-2537: Fax: (202) 512-6061: To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: Contact: Web site: [hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm]: E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov: Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: Congressional Relations: Gloria Jarmon, Managing Director, JarmonG@gao.gov: (202) 512-4400: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room 7125: Washington, DC 20548: Public Affairs: Susan Becker, Acting Manager, BeckerS@gao.gov: (202) 512-4800: U.S. Government Accountability Office: 441 G Street NW, Room 7149: Washington, DC 20548: