This is the accessible text file for GAO report number GAO-06-1022T 
entitled 'Freedom of Information Act: Preliminary Analysis of 
Processing Trends Shows Importance of Improvement Plans' which was 
released on July 26, 2006. 

This text file was formatted by the U.S. Government Accountability 
Office (GAO) to be accessible to users with visual impairments, as part 
of a longer term project to improve GAO products' accessibility. Every 
attempt has been made to maintain the structural and data integrity of 
the original printed product. Accessibility features, such as text 
descriptions of tables, consecutively numbered footnotes placed at the 
end of the file, and the text of agency comment letters, are provided 
but may not exactly duplicate the presentation or format of the printed 
version. The portable document format (PDF) file is an exact electronic 
replica of the printed version. We welcome your feedback. Please E-mail 
your comments regarding the contents or accessibility features of this 
document to Webmaster@gao.gov. 

This is a work of the U.S. government and is not subject to copyright 
protection in the United States. It may be reproduced and distributed 
in its entirety without further permission from GAO. Because this work 
may contain copyrighted images or other material, permission from the 
copyright holder may be necessary if you wish to reproduce this 
material separately. 

United States Government Accountability Office: 

GAO: 

Testimony before the Subcommittee on Government Management, Finance, 
and Accountability, Committee on Government Reform, House of 
Representatives: 

For Release on Delivery: 

Expected at 2:00 p.m. EDT Wednesday, July 26, 2006: 

Freedom Of Information Act: 

Preliminary Analysis of Processing Trends Shows Importance of 
Improvement Plans: 

Statement of Linda D. Koontz Director, Information Management Issues: 

GAO-06-1022T: 

GAO Highlights: 

Highlights of GAO-06-1022T, a testimony before the Subcommittee on 
Government Management, Finance, and Accountability, Committee on 
Government Reform, House of Representatives 

Why GAO Did This Study: 

The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) establishes that federal agencies 
must provide the public with access to government information, thus 
enabling them to learn about government operations and decisions. To 
help ensure appropriate implementation, the act requires that agencies 
report annually to the Attorney General, providing specific information 
about their FOIA operations. In addition, a recent Executive Order 
directs agencies to develop plans to improve their FOIA operations, 
including, among other things, goals to reduce backlogs in FOIA 
requests. 

GAO has reported previously on the contents of these annual reports for 
25 major agencies. For this hearing, GAO was asked to testify both on 
the annual reports for fiscal year 2005 and on the recently developed 
improvement plans for these 25 agencies. GAO based its testimony on its 
ongoing work on these topics. Upon completion of its ongoing review, 
GAO expects to make recommendations to improve agency implementation of 
the Executive Order, including efforts to reduce and eliminate backlog. 

What GAO Found: 

According to data reported by agencies in their annual reports, the 
public continues to request and receive increasing amounts of 
information from the federal government through FOIA; however, 
excepting one case—the Social Security Administration (SSA)—the rate of 
increase has flattened in recent years. (SSA reported an additional 16 
million requests in 2005, dwarfing those for all other agencies 
combined, which together total about 2.6 million; SSA attributed this 
rise to an improvement in its method of counting requests. However, 
Justice officials have suggested that SSA consider treating the bulk of 
these requests as non-FOIA requests and thus not include them in future 
reports.) When SSA’s numbers are excluded, data reported by the other 
24 major agencies show that the number of requests received increased 
by 27 percent from fiscal year 2002 to 2005, but by only about 2.5 
percent from fiscal year 2004. As more requests come in, agencies also 
report that they have been processing more of them—25 percent more from 
2002 to 2005 (but only about 2.0 percent more than from 2004). Despite 
processing more requests, agencies have not kept up with the increase 
in requests being made: the number of pending requests carried over 
from year to year has been steadily increasing, rising to about 200,000 
in fiscal year 2005—43 percent more than in 2002. The rate of increase 
in requests pending is also growing: the increase from fiscal year 2004 
to 2005 is 24 percent, compared to 11 percent from 2003 to 2004. 

Most of the agency improvement plans discussed reducing backlog, but 
not all consistently followed the Executive Order or implementing 
guidance provided by the Justice Department. Of the 25 agencies, 3 had 
not posted their plans in time to be included in this testimony, and 1 
reported no backlog. Of the remaining 21 agencies, 12 followed the 
Executive Order’s instruction to establish measurable, outcome-oriented 
objectives for reducing or eliminating their backlogs, as well as 
timetables with milestones for meeting these objectives. Nine agencies 
did not do this, although they accounted for a substantial 
fraction—about 29 percent—of the requests reported to be pending at the 
end of fiscal year 2005. (Most agencies did provide goals and 
timetables for other kinds of objectives, however, such as performing 
staffing analyses and reviewing progress.) In addition, agencies 
generally did not specify the dates or numbers they were using as the 
baselines for their existing backlogs, which will be important for 
measuring improvement. GAO’s ongoing work suggests that factors 
contributing to these deficiencies include difficulties in coordinating 
responses among components in large, decentralized agencies and 
limitations in the systems that track FOIA processing. In addition, 
neither the Executive Order nor Justice guidance established a baseline 
date for measuring the backlog or directed agencies to establish such a 
date. Without clearly defined baselines, specific objectives, and 
timetables for reducing backlog, it could be challenging for agency 
heads, Justice, and the Congress to gauge progress in improving FOIA 
processes as intended by the Executive Order. 

[Hyperlink, http://www.gao.gov/cgi-bin/getrpt?GAO-06-1022T]. 

To view the full product, including the scope and methodology, click on 
the link above. For more information, contact Linda Koontz at (202) 512-
6240 or koontzl@gao.gov. 

[End of Section] 

Mr. Chairman and Members of the Subcommittee: 

I appreciate the opportunity to participate in the Subcommittee's 
hearing on the implementation of the Freedom of Information Act 
(FOIA).[Footnote 1] Generally speaking, FOIA establishes that federal 
agencies must provide the public with access to government information, 
thus enabling them to learn about government operations and decisions. 
Specific requests by the public for information through the act have 
led to disclosure of waste, fraud, abuse, and wrongdoing in the 
government, as well as the identification of unsafe consumer products, 
harmful drugs, and serious health hazards. 

To help ensure appropriate implementation, the act requires that 
agencies provide annual reports on their FOIA operations to the 
Attorney General, including specific information such as how many 
requests were received and processed in the previous fiscal year and 
how many requests were pending at the end of the year. In addition, the 
President issued an Executive Order[Footnote 2] in December 2005 that 
is aimed at improving agencies' disclosure of information consistent 
with FOIA. Among other things, this order requires each agency to 
review its FOIA operations and develop improvement plans; by June 14, 
2006, each agency was to submit a report to the Attorney General and 
the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that 
summarizes the results of the agency's review and includes a copy of 
its improvement plan. These plans are to include specific outcome- 
oriented goals and timetables, by which the agency head is to evaluate 
the agency's success in implementing the plan. The Executive Order 
specifically requires that these plans address ways to eliminate or 
reduce any backlog of FOIA requests. 

As requested, in my remarks today, I will discuss two topics, basing my 
discussion on ongoing work that we are performing for the Subcommittee: 
(1) statistics on the processing of FOIA requests as reflected in 
agencies' 2005 annual reports, highlighting any trends in these reports 
since 2002, and (2) to what extent agencies addressed the Executive 
Order's requirement to provide measurable, outcome-oriented goals to 
reduce or eliminate backlog, along with timetables that include 
milestones for these goals. 

To describe statistics on the processing of FOIA requests, we analyzed 
annual report data for fiscal years 2002 through 2005 from 25 major 
agencies[Footnote 3] (herein we refer to this scope as governmentwide). 
To describe how agency improvement plans addressed the order's 
requirements regarding goals and timetables to address backlog, we 
analyzed the 22 agencies' plans that were published as of June 30, 
2006, to determine whether they contained descriptions of activities to 
reduce backlog, along with goals and timetables that could be used to 
evaluate progress.[Footnote 4] We also reviewed the Executive Order 
itself, implementing guidance issued by OMB and the Department of 
Justice, other FOIA guidance issued by Justice, and our past work in 
this area. Three agencies, the Departments of State and Homeland 
Security and the Agency for International Development, had not 
published their plans by June 30, and thus we could not analyze them 
for this hearing. These three agencies have since provided their plans. 
We discussed the content of this statement with officials of the 
Department of Justice, including the Director of the Office of 
Information and Privacy. 

We conducted our review in accordance with generally accepted 
government auditing standards, except that we did not verify the 
accuracy and reliability of the data in agencies' annual reports in 
time to be included in this testimony. As a result, our findings on the 
status of FOIA implementation as reflected in agencies' annual reports 
are preliminary and may change when we complete our assessment of data 
reliability. We performed our work from April to July 2006. 

Results in Brief: 

The public continues to request and receive increasing amounts of 
information from the federal government through FOIA; however, 
excepting one case--the Social Security Administration (SSA)--the rate 
of increase has flattened in recent years.[Footnote 5] Based on data 
reported by 24 major agencies in their annual FOIA reports, the number 
of requests received in fiscal year 2005 increased by 27 percent from 
2002, but by only about 2.5 percent from 2004. As more requests come 
in, agencies also report that they have been processing more of them-- 
25 percent more from 2002 to 2005 (but only about 2.0 percent more than 
from 2004). For 87 percent of requests processed in fiscal year 2005, 
agencies reported that responsive records were provided in full to 
requesters.However, the number of pending requests carried over from 
year to year has been steadily increasing, rising 43 percent since 
2002[Footnote 6]. Further, the rate of increase is growing: the 
increase from fiscal year 2004 to fiscal year 2005 is 24 percent, 
compared to 11 percent from 2003 to 2004. Finally, the median times to 
process requests varied greatly across the government, ranging from 
less than 10 days for some agency components to more than 100 days at 
others (sometimes much more than 100). 

Most of the agency improvement plans discussed reducing backlog, but 
not all consistently followed the Executive Order or implementing 
guidance provided by the Justice Department. Of the 25 agencies, 3 had 
not posted their plans in time to be included in this testimony, and 1 
reported no backlog. Of the remaining 21 agencies, 12 followed the 
Executive Order's instruction to establish measurable, outcome- 
oriented goals for reducing or eliminating their backlogs, as well as 
timetables with milestones for achieving these goals. Nine agencies did 
not do this, although they accounted for a substantial portion--about 
29 percent--of the requests reported to be pending at the end of fiscal 
year 2005. (Most agencies did provide goals and timetables for other 
kinds of objectives, however, such as performing staffing analyses and 
reviewing progress.) In addition, agencies generally did not specify 
the dates or numbers they were using as the baselines for their 
existing backlogs, which will be important for measuring improvement. 
GAO's ongoing work suggests that factors contributing to these 
deficiencies include difficulties in coordinating responses among 
components in large, decentralized agencies and limitations in the 
systems that track FOIA processing. In addition, neither the Executive 
Order nor Justice guidance established a baseline date for measuring 
the backlog or directed agencies to establish such a date. Without 
clearly defined baselines, specific objectives, and timetables for 
reducing backlog, it could be challenging for agency heads, Justice, 
and the Congress to measure progress in improving FOIA processes, as 
intended by the Executive Order. 

When we complete our ongoing review and analysis of FOIA statistics and 
agency improvement plans, we anticipate making recommendations to 
improve agency implementation of the Executive Order, including efforts 
to reduce and eliminate backlog. 

Background: 

FOIA establishes a legal right of access to government records and 
information, on the basis of the principles of openness and 
accountability in government. Before the act (originally enacted in 
1966),[Footnote 7] an individual seeking access to federal records had 
faced the burden of establishing a right to examine them. FOIA 
established a "right to know" standard for access, instead of a "need 
to know," and shifted the burden of proof from the individual to the 
government agency seeking to deny access. 

FOIA provides the public with access to government information either 
through "affirmative agency disclosure"--publishing information in the 
Federal Register or the Internet, or making it available in reading 
rooms--or in response to public requests for disclosure. Public 
requests for disclosure of records are the best known type of FOIA 
disclosure. Any member of the public may request access to information 
held by federal agencies, without showing a need or reason for seeking 
the information. 

Not all information held by the government is subject to FOIA. The act 
prescribes nine specific categories of information that are exempt from 
disclosure: for example, trade secrets and certain privileged 
commercial or financial information, certain personnel and medical 
files, and certain law enforcement records or information (attachment 1 
provides the complete list). In denying access to material, agencies 
may cite these exemptions. The act requires agencies to notify 
requesters of the reasons for any adverse determination (that is, a 
determination not to provide records) and grants requesters the right 
to appeal agency decisions to deny access. 

In addition, agencies are required to meet certain time frames for 
making key determinations: whether to comply with requests (20 business 
days from receipt of the request), responses to appeals of adverse 
determinations (20 business days from filing of the appeal), and 
whether to provide expedited processing of requests (10 business days 
from receipt of the request). Congress did not establish a statutory 
deadline for making releasable records available, but instead required 
agencies to make them available promptly. 

The FOIA Process at Federal Agencies: 

Although the specific details of processes for handling FOIA requests 
vary among agencies, the major steps in handling a request are similar 
across the government. Agencies receive requests, usually in writing 
(although they may accept requests by telephone or electronically), 
which can come from any organization or member of the public. Once 
received, the request goes through several phases, which include 
initial processing, searching for and retrieving responsive records, 
preparing responsive records for release, approving the release of the 
records, and releasing the records to the requester. Figure 1 is an 
overview of the process, from the receipt of a request to the release 
of records. 

Figure 1: Overview of Generic FOIA Process: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis of agency information. 

[End of figure] 

During the initial processing phase, a request is logged into the 
agency's FOIA system, and a case file is started. The request is then 
reviewed to determine its scope, estimate fees, and provide an initial 
response to the requester (in general, this simply acknowledges receipt 
of the request). After this point, the FOIA staff begins its search to 
retrieve responsive records. This step may include searching for 
records from multiple locations and program offices. After potentially 
responsive records are located, the documents are reviewed to ensure 
that they are within the scope of the request. 

During the next two phases, the agency ensures that appropriate 
information is to be released under the provisions of the act. First, 
the agency reviews the responsive records to make any redactions based 
on the statutory exemptions. Once the exemption review is complete, the 
final set of responsive records is turned over to the FOIA office, 
which calculates appropriate fees, if applicable. Before release, the 
redacted responsive records are then given a final review, possibly by 
the agency's general counsel, and then a response letter is generated, 
summarizing the agency's actions regarding the request. Finally, the 
responsive records are released to the requester. 

Some requests are relatively simple to process, such as requests for 
specific pieces of information that the requester sends directly to the 
appropriate office. Other requests may require more extensive 
processing, depending on their complexity, the volume of information 
involved, the need for the agency FOIA office to work with offices that 
have relevant subject-matter expertise to find and obtain information, 
the need for a FOIA officer to review and redact information in the 
responsive material, the need to communicate with the requester about 
the scope of the request, and the need to communicate with the 
requester about the fees that will be charged for fulfilling the 
request (or whether fees will be waived).[Footnote 8] 

Specific details of agency processes for handling requests vary, 
depending on the agency's organizational structure and the complexity 
of the requests received. While some agencies centralize processing in 
one main office, other agencies have separate FOIA offices for each 
agency component and field office. Agencies also vary in how they allow 
requests to be made. Depending on the agency, requesters can submit 
requests by telephone, fax, letter, or e-mail or through the Web. In 
addition, agencies may process requests in two ways, known as 
"multitrack" and "single track." Multitrack processing involves 
dividing requests into two groups: (1) simple requests requiring 
relatively minimal review, which are placed in one processing track, 
and (2) more voluminous and complex requests, which are placed in 
another track. In contrast, single-track processing does not 
distinguish between simple and complex requests. With single-track 
processing, agencies process all requests on a first-in/first-out 
basis. Agencies can also process FOIA requests on an expedited basis 
when a requester has shown a compelling need or urgency for the 
information. 

As agencies process FOIA requests, they generally place them in one of 
four possible disposition categories: grants, partial grants, denials, 
and "not disclosed for other reasons." These categories are defined as 
follows: 

* Grants: Agency decisions to disclose all requested records in full. 

* Partial grants: Agency decisions to withhold some records in whole or 
in part, because such information was determined to fall within one or 
more exemptions. 

* Denials: Agency decisions not to release any part of the requested 
records because all information in the records is determined to be 
exempt under one or more statutory exemptions. 

* Not disclosed for other reasons: Agency decisions not to release 
requested information for any of a variety of reasons other than 
statutory exemptions from disclosing records. The categories and 
definitions of these "other" reasons for nondisclosure are shown in 
table 1. 

Table 1: "Other" Reasons for Nondisclosure: 

Category: No records; 
Definition: The agency searched and found no record responsive to the 
request. 

Category: Referrals; 
Definition: The agency referred records responsive to the request to 
another agency. 

Category: Request withdrawn; 
Definition: The requester withdrew the request. 

Category: Fee-related reasons; 
Definition: The requester refused to commit to pay fees (or other 
reasons related to fees). 

Category: Records not reasonably described; 
Definition: The requester did not describe the records sought with 
sufficient specifically to allow them to be located with a reasonable 
amount of effort. 

Category: Not a proper FOIA request; 
Definition: The request was not a FOIA request for one of several 
reasons. 

Category: Not an agency record; 
Definition: Duplicate request: The request was submitted more than once 
by the same requester. 

Source: Department of Justice. 

[End of table] 

When a FOIA request is denied in full or in part, or the requested 
records are not disclosed for other reasons, the requester is entitled 
to be told the reason for the denial, to appeal the denial, and to 
challenge it in court. 

The Privacy Act Also Provides Individuals with Access Rights: 

In addition to FOIA, the Privacy Act of 1974[Footnote 9] includes 
provisions granting individuals the right to gain access to and correct 
information about themselves held by federal agencies. Thus the Privacy 
Act serves as a second major legal basis, in addition to FOIA, for the 
public to use in obtaining government information. The Privacy Act also 
places limitations on agencies' collection, disclosure, and use of 
personal information. 

Although the two laws differ in scope, procedures in both FOIA and the 
Privacy Act permit individuals to seek access to records about 
themselves--known as "first-party" access. Depending on the individual 
circumstances, one law may allow broader access or more extensive 
procedural rights than the other, or access may be denied under one act 
and allowed under the other. Consequently, the Department of Justice's 
Office of Information and Privacy issued guidance that it is "good 
policy for agencies to treat all first-party access requests as FOIA 
requests (as well as possibly Privacy Act requests), regardless of 
whether the FOIA is cited in a requester's letter." This guidance was 
intended to help ensure that requesters receive the fullest possible 
response to their inquiries, regardless of which law they cite. 

In addition, Justice guidance for the annual FOIA report directs 
agencies to include Privacy Act requests (that is, first-party 
requests) in the statistics reported. According to the guidance, "A 
Privacy Act request is a request for records concerning oneself; such 
requests are also treated as FOIA requests. (All requests for access to 
records, regardless of which law is cited by the requester, are 
included in this report.)" 

Although FOIA and the Privacy Act can both apply to first-party 
requests, such requests are not in many cases processed in the same way 
as described earlier for FOIA requests. For example, most SSA first- 
party requests are processed by staff other than FOIA staff, 
specifically, staff in SSA's field and district offices and teleservice 
centers.[Footnote 10] 

Roles of OMB and Justice in FOIA Implementation: 

OMB and the Department of Justice both have roles in the implementation 
of FOIA. The act requires OMB to issue guidelines to "provide for a 
uniform schedule of fees for all agencies."[Footnote 11] OMB issued 
this guidance in April 1987.[Footnote 12] 

The Department of Justice oversees agencies' compliance with FOIA and 
is the primary source of policy guidance for agencies. Specifically, 
Justice's requirements under the act are to: 

* make agencies' annual FOIA reports available through a single 
electronic access point and notify Congress as to their availability; 

* in consultation with OMB, develop guidelines for the required annual 
agency reports, so that all reports use common terminology and follow a 
similar format; and: 

* submit an annual report on FOIA statistics and the efforts undertaken 
by Justice to encourage agency compliance. 

Within the Department of Justice, the Office of Information and Privacy 
has lead responsibility for providing guidance and support to federal 
agencies on FOIA issues. This office first issued guidelines for agency 
preparation and submission of annual reports in the spring of 1997. It 
also periodically issues additional guidance on annual reports as well 
as on compliance, provides training, and maintains a counselors service 
to provide expert, one-on-one assistance to agency FOIA staff. Further, 
the Office of Information and Privacy also makes a variety of FOIA and 
Privacy Act resources available to agencies and the public via the 
Justice Web site and on-line bulletins. 

1996 Amendments Established Annual FOIA Reports: 

In 1996, the Congress amended FOIA to provide for public access to 
information in an electronic format (among other purposes). These 
amendments, referred to as e-FOIA, also required that agencies submit a 
report to the Attorney General on or before February 1 of each year 
that covers the preceding fiscal year and includes information about 
agencies' FOIA operations.[Footnote 13] The following are examples of 
information that is to be included in these reports: 

* number of requests received, processed, and pending; 

* median number of days taken by the agency to process different types 
of requests; 

* determinations made by the agency not to disclose information and the 
reasons for not disclosing the information; 

* disposition of administrative appeals by requesters; 

* information on the costs associated with handling of FOIA requests; 
and: 

* full-time-equivalent staffing information. 

In addition to providing their annual reports to the Attorney General, 
agencies are to make them available to the public in electronic form. 
The Attorney General is required to make all agency reports available 
on line at a single electronic access point and report to Congress no 
later than April 1 of each year that these reports are available in 
electronic form. 

In 2001, we prepared the first in a series of reports on the 
implementation of the 1996 amendments to FOIA, starting from fiscal 
year 1999.[Footnote 14] In this and subsequent reviews, we examined the 
contents of these annual reports for 25 major agencies (shown in table 
2).[Footnote 15] They include the 24 major agencies covered by the 
Chief Financial Officers Act, as well as the Central Intelligence 
Agency and, until 2003, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 
In 2003, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), 
which incorporated FEMA, led to a shift in some FOIA requests from 
agencies affected by the creation of the new department, but the same 
major component entities are reflected in all the years reviewed. 

Table 2: Agencies Reviewed: 

Agency: Agency for International Development; 
Abbreviation: AID. 

Agency: Central Intelligence Agency; 
Abbreviation: CIA. 

Agency: Department of Agriculture; 
Abbreviation: USDA. 

Agency: Department of Commerce; 
Abbreviation: DOC. 

Agency: Department of Defense; 
Abbreviation: DOD. 

Agency: Department of Education; 
Abbreviation: ED. 

Agency: Department of Energy; 
Abbreviation: DOE.  

Agency: Department of Health and Human Services; 
Abbreviation: HHS. 

Agency: Department of Homeland Security[ A]; 
Abbreviation: DHS. 

Agency: Department of Homeland Security: Federal Emergency Management 
Agency[A]; 
Abbreviation: FEMA. 

Agency: Department of the Interior; 
DOI. 

Agency: Department of Justice; 
Abbreviation: DOJ. 

Agency: Department of Labor; 
Abbreviation: DOL. 

Agency: Department of State; 
Abbreviation: State. 

Agency: Department of the Treasury; 
Abbreviation: Treas.  

Department of Transportation; 
Abbreviation: DOT. 

Department of Veterans Affairs; 
Abbreviation: VA.  

Agency: Environmental Protection Agency; 
Abbreviation: EPA. 

Agency: General Services Administration; 
Abbreviation: GSA. 

Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 
Abbreviation: NASA.  

Agency: National Science Foundation; 
Abbreviation: NSF.  

Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission; 
Abbreviation: NRC. 

Agency: Office of Personnel Management; 
Abbreviation: OPM. 

Agency: Small Business Administration; 
Abbreviation: SBA. 

Agency: Social Security Administration; 
Abbreviation: SSA. 

Source: GAO. 

[A] FEMA information was reported separately in fiscal year 2002. In 
fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005, FEMA was part of DHS. 

[End of table] 

Increases in Requests Are Slowing, but Pending Cases Are Increasing: 

The annual FOIA reports for fiscal year 2005 show that many of the 
trends of previous years are continuing: Requests received and 
processed continue to rise; however, excepting one case--SSA--the rate 
of increase has flattened in recent years. We present SSA's statistics 
separately because the agency reported an additional 16 million 
requests in 2005, dwarfing those for all other agencies combined, which 
together total about 2.6 million. SSA attributed this rise to an 
improvement in its method of counting requests. Justice officials have 
raised questions about the inclusion of these numbers in FOIA 
statistics. 

Figure 2 shows total requests reported governmentwide for fiscal years 
2002 through 2005, with SSA's share shown separately. This figure shows 
the magnitude of SSA's contribution to the whole FOIA picture, as well 
as the scale of the jump from 2004 to 2005. 

Figure 2: Total FOIA Requests with SSA Shown Separately, Fiscal Years 
2002-2005: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis, FOIA annual reports for fiscal years 2002-2005 
(self-reported data). 

[End of figure] 

Figure 3 presents these statistics on a scale that allows a clearer 
view of the rate of increase in FOIA requests received and processed in 
the rest of the government. As this figure shows, when SSA's numbers 
are excluded, the rate of increase is modest and has been flattening: 
from fiscal year 2002 to 2005, requests received increased by about 27 
percent, and requests processed increased by about 25 percent. From 
fiscal year 2004 to 2005, requests received increased about 2.5 
percent, and requests processed increased about 2.0 percent. 

Figure 3: Total FOIA Requests and FOIA Requests Processed, Fiscal Years 
2002-2005: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis, FOIA annual reports for fiscal years 2002-2005 
(self-reported data). 

[End of Figure] 

According to SSA, the increases that the agency reported in fiscal year 
2005 can be attributed to an improvement in its method of counting a 
category of requests it calls "simple requests handled by non-FOIA 
staff." In the past 4 years, SSA's FOIA reports have consistently shown 
significant growth in this category, which has accounted for the major 
portion of all SSA requests reported (see table 3). In each of these 
years, SSA has attributed the increases in this category largely to 
better reporting, as well as actual increases in requests. 

Table 3: Comparison of SSA's Simple Requests Handled by Non-FOIA Staff 
to Totals, Fiscal Years 2002 to 2005: 

Fiscal year: 2005; 
Total requests received: 17,257,886; 
Total requests processed: 17,262,315; 
Simple requests handled by non- FOIA staff: 17,223,713; 
Percentage of total processed: 99.8. 

Fiscal year: 2004; 
Total requests received: 1,453,619; 
Total requests processed: 1,450,493; 
Simple requests handled by non- FOIA staff: 1,270,512; 
Percentage of total processed: 87.6. 

Fiscal year: 2003; 
Total requests received: 705,280; 
Total requests processed: 704,941; 
Simple requests handled by non- FOIA staff: 678,849; 
Percentage of total processed: 96.3. 

Fiscal year: 2002; 
Total requests received: 268,488; 
Total requests processed: 292,884; 
Simple requests handled by non-FOIA staff: 245,877; 
Percentage of total processed: 84.0. 

Sources: SSA FOIA reports (self-reported data), GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

SSA describes requests in this category as typically being requests by 
individuals for access to their own records, or else requests in which 
individuals consent for SSA to supply information about themselves to 
third parties (such as insurance and mortgage companies) so that they 
can receive housing assistance, mortgages, disability insurance, and so 
on.[Footnote 16] According to SSA's FOIA report, these requests are 
handled by personnel in about 1,500 locations in SSA, including field 
and district offices and teleservice centers. Such requests are almost 
always granted,[Footnote 17] according to SSA, and most receive 
immediate responses. SSA has stated that it does not keep processing 
statistics (such as median days to process) on these requests, which it 
reports separately from other FOIA requests (for which processing 
statistics are kept). 

According to SSA, in fiscal year 2005, the agency began to use 
automated systems to capture the numbers of requests processed by non- 
FOIA staff, generating statistics automatically as requests were 
processed; the result, according to SSA, is a much more accurate count. 
However, Justice officials have suggested that SSA consider treating 
the bulk of these requests as non-FOIA requests and thus not include 
them in future reports. 

Besides SSA, agencies reporting large numbers of requests received were 
the Departments of Agriculture, Defense, Health and Human Services, 
Homeland Security, Justice, the Treasury, and Veterans Affairs, as 
shown in table 4. The rest of the agencies combined account for only 
about 3 percent of the total requests received (if SSA is excluded). 
Table 4 presents, in descending order of request totals, the numbers of 
requests received and percentages of the total (calculated with and 
without SSA's statistics). 

Table 4: Requests Received, Fiscal Year 2005: 

Agency: SSA; 
Total: 17,257,886; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 86.78; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: --. 

Agency: VA; 
Total: 1,914,395; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 9.63; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 72.81. 

Agency: HHS: 
Total: 222,372; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 1.12; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 8.46. 

Agency: DHS; 
Total: 163,016; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.82; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 6.20. 

Agency: DOD; 
Total: 81,304; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.41; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 3.09. 

Agency: Treas; 
Total: 53,330; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.27; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 2.03. 

Agency: DOJ; 
Total: 52,010; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.26; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 1.98. 

Agency: USDA; 
Total: 51,516; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.26; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 1.96. 

Agency: DOL; 
Total: 23,505; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.12; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.89. 

Agency: EPA; 
Total: 12,201; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.06; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.46. 

Agency: OPM; 
Total: 12,085; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.06; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.46. 

Agency: DOT; 
Total: 9,597; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.05; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.37. 

Agency: DOI; 
Total: 6,749; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.03; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.26. 

Agency: State; 
Total: 4,602; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.02; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.18. 

Agency: HUD; 
Total: 4,227; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.02; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.16. 

Agency: SBA; 
Total: 3,739; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.02; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.14. 

Agency: DOE; 
Total: 3,729; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.02; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA:  0.14. 

Agency: CIA; 
Total: 2,935; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.01; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.11. 

Agency: ED; 
Total: 2,416; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.01; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.09. 

Agency: DOC; 
Total: 1,804; 
Percentage of total including SSA:  0.01; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.07. 

Agency: GSA; 
Total: 1,416; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.01; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.05. 

Agency: NASA; 
Total: 1,229; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.01; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.05. 

Agency: NRC; 
Total: 371; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.00; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.01. 

Agency: AID; 
Total: 369; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.00; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.01. 

Agency: NSF; 
Total: 273; 
Percentage of total including SSA: 0.00; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: 0.01. 

Agency: Total excluding SSA; 
Total: 2,629,190; 
Percentage of total including SSA: --; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: --. 

Agency: Total including SSA; 
Total: 19,887,076; 
Percentage of total including SSA: --; 
Percentage of total excluding SSA: --. 

Source: FOIA annual reports for 2005 (self-reported data). 

Note: Abbreviations are as in table 2. 

[End of table] 

Most Requests Are Granted in Full: 

Most FOIA requests in 2005 were granted in full, with relatively few 
being partially granted, denied, or not disclosed for other reasons 
(statistics are shown in table 5). This generalization holds with or 
without SSA's inclusion. However, including SSA's numbers in the 
proportion of grants overwhelms the other categories--raising this 
number from 87 percent of the total to 98 percent. This is to be 
expected, since SSA reports that it grants the great majority of its 
simple requests handled by non-FOIA staff, which make up the bulk of 
SSA's statistics. 

Table 5: Disposition of Processed Requests for Fiscal Year 2005: 

Disposition: Full grants; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Number: 2,252,867; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Percentage: 87.2; 
Statistics including SSA: Number: 19,513,259; 
Statistics including SSA: Percentage: 98.3. 

Disposition: Partial grants; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Number: 104,356; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Percentage: 4.0; 
Statistics including SSA: Number: 104,631; 
Statistics including SSA: Percentage: 0.5. 

Disposition: Denial; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Number: 20,949; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Percentage: 0.8; 
Statistics including SSA: Number: 21,403; 
Statistics including SSA: Percentage: 0.1. 

Disposition: Not disclosed for other reasons; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Number: 206,669; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Percentage: 8.0; 
Statistics including SSA: Number: 207,893; 
Statistics including SSA: Percentage: 1.1. 

Disposition: Total; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Number: 2,584,871; 
Statistics excluding SSA: Percentage: --; 
Statistics including SSA: Number: 19,847,186; 
Statistics including SSA: Percentage: --. 

Source: FOIA annual reports for 2005 (self-reported data). 

[End of table] 

Four of the eight agencies that handled the largest numbers of requests 
(HHS, SSA, USDA, and VA; see table 4) also granted the largest 
percentages of requests in full, as shown in figure 4. This figure 
shows, by agency, the disposition of requests processed: that is, 
whether granted in full, partially granted, denied, or not disclosed 
for the "other" reasons shown in table 1. 

Figure 4: Disposition of Processed Requests, by Agency (Fiscal Year 
2005): 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis, FOIA annual reports for fiscal year 2005 (self-
reported data). 

Note: Abbreviations are shown in table 2. 

[End of Figure] 

As the figure shows, the numbers of fully granted requests varied 
widely among agencies in fiscal year 2005. Seven agencies made full 
grants of requested records in over 80 percent of the cases they 
processed (besides the four already mentioned, these include DOE, OPM, 
and SBA). In contrast, 13 of 25 made full grants of requested records 
in less than 40 percent of their cases, including 3 agencies (CIA, NSF, 
and State) that made full grants in less than 20 percent of cases 
processed. 

This variance among agencies in the disposition of requests has been 
evident in prior years as well.[Footnote 18] In many cases, the 
variance can be accounted for by the types of requests that different 
agencies process. For example, as discussed earlier, SSA grants a very 
high proportion of requests because they are requests for personal 
information about individuals that are routinely made available to or 
for the individuals concerned. Similarly, VA routinely makes medical 
records available to individual veterans. 

Processing Times Vary: 

For 2005, the reported time required to process requests (by track) 
varied considerably among agencies. Table 6 presents data on median 
processing times for fiscal year 2005. For agencies that reported 
processing times by component rather than for the agency as a whole, 
the table indicates the range of median times reported by the agency's 
components. 

Table 6: Median Days to Process Requests for Fiscal Year 2005, by 
Track: 

Agency: AID; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: --; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: --; 
Type of request processing track: Single: 55; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 34. 

Agency: CIA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 7; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 68; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: --. 

Agency: DHS; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 16-61 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 3-242; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 2-45. 

Agency: DOC; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 12; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 20; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 8. 

Agency: DOD; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 16; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 85; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: --. 

Agency: DOE; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 5-106; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 10-170; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 1-12. 

Agency: DOI; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 2-43; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 28-89; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 1-15. 

Agency: DOJ; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 0-139; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 12-863; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 2-185. 

Agency: DOL; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 6-30; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 14-60; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 2-18. 

Agency: DOT; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 1-30; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 14-60; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 2-18. 

Agency: ED; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 35; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 66; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 24. 

Agency: EPA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 13-32; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 4-166; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 8-109. 

Agency: GSA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: --; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 14; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: --. 

Agency: HHS; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 10-26; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 60-370; 
Type of request processing track: Single: 5-173; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 14-158. 

Agency: HUD; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 21-65; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 35-160; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 9-70. 

Agency: NASA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 19; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 49; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 15. 

Agency: NRC; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 12; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 75; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 20. 

Agency: NSF; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: --; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: --; 
Type of request processing track: Single: 14; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: --. 

Agency: OPM; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: --; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: --; 
Type of request processing track: Single: 14; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 1. 

Agency: SBA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: --; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: --; 
Type of request processing track: Single: 7; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: --. 

Agency: SSA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 15; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 39; 
Type of request processing track: Single: 10; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 17. 

Agency: State; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 14; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 142; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 136. 

Agency: Treas; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 2-86; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 3-251; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 1. 

Agency: USDA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: 2-90; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 10-1277; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 1-40. 

Agency: VA; 
Type of Request processing track: Simple: --; 
Type of request processing track: Complex: 1-60; 
Type of request processing track: Single: --; 
Type of request processing track: Expedited: 1-10. 

Source: FOIA annual reports for fiscal years 2005 (self- reported 
data). 

Note: For agencies that reported processing times by component, the 
table indicates the range of reported component median times. A dash 
indicates that the agency did not report any median time for a given 
track in a given year. 

[End of table] 

As the table shows, eight agencies had components that reported 
processing simple requests in less than 10 days (these components are 
part of the CIA, Energy, the Interior, Justice, Labor, Transportation, 
the Treasury, and USDA); for each of these agencies, the lower value of 
the reported ranges is less than 10. On the other hand, median time to 
process simple requests is relatively long at some organizations (for 
example, components of HHS, Justice, and USDA, as shown by median 
ranges whose upper end values are greater than 100 days). 

For complex requests, the picture is similarly mixed. Components of 
four agencies (EPA, DHS, the Treasury, and VA) reported processing 
complex requests quickly--with a median of less than 10 days. In 
contrast, other components of several agencies (DHS, Energy, EPA, HHS, 
HUD, Justice, State, Transportation, the Treasury, and USDA) reported 
relatively long median times to process complex requests, with median 
days greater than 100. 

Six agencies (AID, HHS, NSF, OPM, SBA, and SSA) reported using single- 
track processing. The median processing times for single-track 
processing varied from 5 days (at an HHS component) to 173 days (at 
another HHS component). 

The changes from fiscal year 2004 to 2005 also vary. For agencies that 
reported agencywide figures, table 7 shows how many showed increased or 
decreased median processing times. Table 8 shows these numbers for the 
components that were reported separately. 

Table 7: Changes in Median Processing Times Reported by Agencies for 
Different Processing Tracks: 

Processing Track: Simple; 
Number of agencies using this track: 7; 
Agencies with increased median times: Number: 3; 
Agencies with increased median times: Percentage: 42.9; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Number: 3; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Percentage: 42.9; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Number: 1; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Percentage: 14.3. 

Processing Track: Complex; 
Number of agencies using this track: 8; 
Agencies with increased median times: Number: 5; 
Agencies with increased median times: Percentage: 62.5; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Number: 2; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Percentage: 25.0; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Number: 1; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Percentage: 12.58. 

Processing Track: Single; 
Number of agencies using this track: 5; 
Agencies with increased median times: Number: 3; 
Agencies with increased median times: Percentage: 60.0; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Number: 2; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Percentage: 40.0; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Number: 0; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Percentage: 0.0. 

Processing Track: Expedited; 
Number of agencies using this track: 5; 
Agencies with increased median times: Number: 2; 
Agencies with increased median times: Percentage: 40.0; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Number: 3; 
Agencies with decreased median times: Percentage: 60.0; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Number: 0; 
Agencies with unchanged median times: Percentage: 0.0. 

Sources: Annual FOIA reports, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Table 8: Changes in Median Processing Times Reported by Components for 
Different Processing Tracks: 

Processing track: Simple; 
Number of components using this track: 122; 
Components with increased median times: Number: 57; 
Components with increased median times: Percentage: 46.7; 
Components with decreased median times: Number: 46; 
Components with decreased median times: Percentage: 37.7; 
Components with unchanged median times: Number: 19; 
Components with unchanged median times: Percentage: 15.6. 

Processing track: Complex; 
Number of components using this track: 105; 
Components with increased median times: Number: 52; 
Components with increased median times: Percentage: 46.7; 
Components with decreased median times: Number: 44; 
Components with decreased median times: Percentage: 41.9; 
Components with unchanged median times: Number: 9; 
Components with unchanged median times: Percentage: 8.6. 

Processing track: Single; 
Number of components using this track: 9; 
Components with increased median times: Number: 3; 
Components with increased median times: Percentage: 33.3; 
Components with decreased median times: Number: 2; 
Components with decreased median times: Percentage: 22.2; 
Components with unchanged median times: Number: 4; 
Components with unchanged median times: Percentage: 44.4. 

Processing track: Expedited; 
Number of components using this track: 43; 
Components with increased median times: Number: 25; 
Components with increased median times: Percentage: 58.1; 
Components with decreased median times: Number: 13; 
Components with decreased median times: Percentage: 30.2; 
Components with unchanged median times: Number: 5; 
Components with unchanged median times: Percentage: 11.6. 

Sources: Annual FOIA reports, GAO analysis. 

Note: A total of 204 components are listed in the FOIA reports. Not all 
the components processed requests or used all the tracks. 

[End of table] 

These tables show that no one pattern emerges across tracks and types 
of reporting, and the numbers of agencies and components involved vary 
from track to track. The picture that emerges is of great variation 
according to circumstances. 

To allow more insight into the variations in median processing times, 
we provide in attachment 2 tables of median processing times as 
reported by agencies and components in the annual FOIA reports in 
fiscal years 2004 and 2005. This attachment also includes information 
on the number of requests reported by the agencies and components, 
which provides context for assessing the median times reported. 

Agency Pending Cases Continue to Increase: 

In addition to processing greater numbers of requests, many agencies 
(11 of 25) also reported that their numbers of pending cases--requests 
carried over from one year to the next--have increased since 2002. In 
2002, pending requests governmentwide were reported to number about 
140,000, whereas in 2005, about 200,000--43 percent more--were 
reported. In addition, the rate of increase grew in fiscal year 2005, 
rising 24 percent from fiscal year 2004, compared to 11 percent from 
2003 to 2004. Figure 5 shows these results, illustrating the 
accelerating rate at which pending cases have been increasing. 

These statistics include pending cases reported by SSA, because as the 
figure shows, these pending cases do not change the governmentwide 
picture significantly. As previously discussed, SSA's pending cases do 
not include simple requests handled by non-FOIA staff, for which SSA 
does not keep these statistics. 

Figure 3: Total FOIA Requests Pending at End of Year, 2002-2005: 

[See PDF for image] 

Source: GAO analysis, FOIA annual reports for fiscal years 2002-2005 
(self-reported data).  

[End of figure] 

Trends for individual agencies show mixed progress in reducing the 
number of pending requests reported from 2002 to 2005--some agencies 
have decreased numbers of pending cases, while others' numbers have 
increased. Figure 6 shows processing rates at the 25 agencies (that is, 
the number of requests that an agency processes relative to the number 
it receives). Eight of the 25 agencies (AID, DHS, the Interior, 
Education, HHS, HUD, NSF, and OPM) reported processing fewer requests 
than they received each year for fiscal years 2003, 2004, and 2005; 8 
additional agencies processed less than they received in two of these 
three years. 

In contrast, two agencies (CIA and DOE) had processing rates above 100 
percent in all three years, meaning that each made continued progress 
in reducing their numbers of pending cases. Fifteen additional agencies 
were able to make at least a small reduction in their numbers of 
pending requests in 1 or more years between fiscal years 2003 and 2005. 

Figure 6: Agency Processing Rate for 25 Agencies: 

[See PDF for Image] 

Source: GAO analysis of FOIA annual reports for fiscal years 2002-2005 
(self-reported data). 

Notes: Abbreviations are as in table 2. 

The agency processing rate is defined as the number of requests 
processed in a given year compared with the requests received, 
expressed as a percentage. 

In 2002, FEMA data were used, and for 2003, 2004, and 2005, DHS data 
were used. 

[End of Figure] 

About Half of FOIA Improvement Plans Do Not Include Goals and 
Timetables for Reducing the Backlog: 

The Executive Order, with its requirement for agencies to develop FOIA 
improvement plans, serves to focus agency managers' attention on the 
important role that FOIA plays in keeping citizens well informed about 
the operations of their government. By requiring measurable goals and 
timetables, the Executive Order provides for a results-oriented 
framework by which agency heads can hold officials accountable for 
improvements in FOIA processing. Further, the Department of Justice's 
guidance on implementing the order provides several tangible 
suggestions for improving FOIA operations. 

The Executive Order states that each agency shall develop an 
improvement plan by June 14, 2006, that includes measurable, outcome- 
oriented goals to reduce or eliminate backlog,[Footnote 19] along with 
timetables that include milestones for these goals. According to this 
guidance, the goals and milestones in agency plans should focus on 
outcomes that are measurable and demonstrate whether or not intended 
results are being achieved.[Footnote 20] Justice's implementation 
guidance directs agencies to include "means of measurement of success 
(e.g., quantitative assessment of backlog reduction expressed in 
numbers of pending requests, percentages, or working days)" and 
provides agencies considerable leeway in choosing measures of 
timeliness.[Footnote 21] 

Most of the 22 agency plans available as of June 30 discussed reducing 
backlog, but not all consistently followed the Executive Order 
directions by establishing goals and timetables for reducing or 
eliminating their backlog. In all, 12 of the 21 agencies that reported 
a backlog included such goals and timetables, but the remaining 9 did 
not do so. (The Small Business Administration did not report a 
backlog.) These 9 agencies accounted for about 29 percent of the almost 
200,000 requests pending at the end of fiscal year 2005 that were 
reported in the annual FOIA reports. 

Table 9 summarizes the results of our analysis. 

Table 9: Inclusion in Agency FOIA Improvement Plans of Both Outcomes 
and Associated Milestones for Reducing Backlog: 

Agency: AID; 
Outcome-oriented goals: --; 
Milestones related goals: --; 
Comment: Plan not provided in time for analysis. 

Agency: CIA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: DHS; 
Outcome-oriented goals: --; 
Milestones related goals: --; 
Comment: Plan not provided in time for analysis. 

Agency: DOC; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: NO; 
Comment: Process goals and timetable only. 

Agency: DOD; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Process goals and timetable only. 

Agency: DOE; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: DOI; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: DOJ; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: DOL; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Process goals and timetable only. 

Agency: DOT; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: ED; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes;  
Comment: --. 

Agency: EPA; 
Outcome-oriented goals:Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: GSA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Backlog reduction not part of improvement plan. 

Agency: HHS; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes;  
Comment: --. 

Agency: HUD; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: NASA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Backlog reduction not part of improvement plan. 

Agency: NRC; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: NSF; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Process goals and timetable only. 

Agency: OPM; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: SBA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: --; 
Milestones related goals: --; 
Comment: No backlog. 

Agency: SSA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Timetable did not include milestones for outcome, only for 
processes. 

Agency: State; 
Outcome-oriented goals: --; 
Milestones related goals: --; 
Comment: Plan not provided in time for analysis. 

Agency: Treas; 
Outcome-oriented goals: Yes; 
Milestones related goals: Yes; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: USDA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No[A]; 
Milestones related goals: No[A]; 
Comment: --. 

Agency: VA; 
Outcome-oriented goals: No; 
Milestones related goals: No; 
Comment: Process goals and timetable only. 

Total: Yes; 
Outcome-oriented goals: 13; 
Milestones related to goals: 12. 

Source: GAO analysis of agency FOIA improvement plans. 

[A] USDA provided objectives and timetables by component. Only the 
Office of Inspector General included outcomes and timetables. 

[End of table] 

As table 9 shows, 13 agencies included goals, but 1 of these (SSA) did 
not include a timetable associated with its goal. 

The goals chosen by the 13 agencies varied. For example, OPM's plan set 
a goal of reducing and eliminating the agency's backlog by December 31, 
2006. EPA's goal was to reduce its response backlog to less than 10 
percent of the number of new FOIA requests received each year. Several 
agencies set goals to reduce backlog to various percentages of their 
current backlog (for example, the CIA, Energy, the Interior, Justice, 
and the Treasury). HUD set an absolute goal of fewer than 400 pending 
requests. 

Although the remaining 8 agency plans discussed efforts to improve FOIA 
processing, they did not contain goals for backlog reduction. In two 
cases (GSA and NASA), agencies did not include such goals because they 
did not include backlog reduction among the areas of improvement on 
which they planned to focus. These agencies did not consider their 
backlogs significant; nonetheless, the Executive Order specifically 
instructed agencies to include goals and timetables to address backlog. 

In other cases, agencies did address backlog reduction but did not 
define goals. Many of these agencies did define process goals, such as 
establishing means to monitor and report on backlog, reviewing current 
processes, and identifying and reviewing tracking systems, but these 
were not accompanied by goals for backlog reduction: 

* For example, the Department of Commerce's plan stated that, to the 
extent possible, its components would use current backlog numbers as a 
ceiling (these generally range from 9 to 13 percent of the workload) 
and work aggressively to reduce these numbers, focusing particularly on 
the 10 oldest requests in each component's backlog. However, although 
the plan provided milestone dates for FOIA officers to review progress 
in this area and assess any need to pursue alternatives (such as 
contract support) for achieving goals, the plan did not provide 
measurable targets for assessing success, such as percentage of 
reduction. 

* Similarly, the Department of Defense set various process goals 
(identifying those FOIA Offices with backlogs greater than 50 cases, 
determining the staffing levels required to significantly reduce the 
backlog, and seeking the necessary funding to provide this additional 
staffing). However, it provided no measurable targets for reducing 
backlog. 

In the timetables that agencies provided in their plans, 12 agencies 
provided milestones for goals that they had identified. As mentioned 
earlier, one agency (SSA) did not include a milestone for its goal of 
eliminating backlog. SSA provided instead a timetable that addressed 
process goals: reorganizing its Office of Public Disclosure and 
developing a new information system. Like SSA, several agencies 
provided timetables for various activities that they included in their 
plans to reduce backlog, but these did not include milestones for 
outcome-oriented goals (for example, Defense provided milestones for 
the process goals described above). 

In addition to setting goals and milestones for those goals, in order 
to demonstrate that goals are achieved, plans should also include 
baselines against which results can be measured. In the case of 
backlog, these numbers can differ from day to day, so specifying a 
baseline is crucial. Baselines can be defined on the basis of a date 
from which an agency intends to measure, the number it is using as its 
baseline, or both. Publicly available baselines are important to 
promote accountability as well as the transparency of government 
processes. 

However, most of the agency improvement plans do not clearly define 
baselines for their existing backlogs. An exception was OPM: in 
describing its goal to eliminate backlog by December 31, 2006, it 
specified its present backlog as 107 requests. Similarly, the 
Department of Education referred to measuring its success in terms of 
having fewer open cases at the end of each year, based on a backlog 
that it specified as 480 as of June 2, 2006. In other cases, agencies 
did not specify whether they planned to measure from the date of their 
plans, from the end of fiscal year 2005, or from some other baseline. 
Some agencies did, however, describe plans to perform analyses that 
would measure their backlogs so that they could then establish the 
necessary baselines. 

Our ongoing work suggests that factors contributing to these 
deficiencies included difficulties in coordinating responses among 
components in large decentralized agencies and limitations in the way 
that agency systems track FOIA processing. In addition, neither the 
Executive Order nor Justice guidance established a baseline date for 
measuring the backlog or directed agencies to establish such a 
baseline. Uncertainty regarding defined baselines could hinder the 
measurement of progress in reducing backlog. Without clearly defined 
baselines, specific objectives, and timetables for reducing backlog, 
the risk is that agency heads, Justice, the Congress, and the public 
could be hampered in determining whether and how well agencies have 
achieved the Executive Order's aims of improving FOIA processing and 
agency disclosure of information. 

When we complete our ongoing review and analysis, we expect to make 
recommendations aimed at improving agency implementation of the 
Executive Order, including efforts to reduce and eliminate backlog. 

In summary, FOIA continues to be a valuable tool for citizens to obtain 
information about the operation and decisions of the federal 
government. Since 2002, agencies have received increasing numbers of 
requests and have also continued to increase the number of requests 
that they process. In addition, agencies continue to grant most 
requests in full. However, the rate of increase in pending requests is 
accelerating. 

Given these continuing trends, the President's Executive Order creates, 
among other things, a renewed, results-oriented emphasis on improving 
request processing and reducing the backlog of pending requests. 
However, our ongoing work suggests that agencies are not yet fully 
complying with the order's requirements for measurable, outcome- 
oriented goals and associated timetables. In addition, agencies have 
not all established clear baselines for their existing backlogs. 
Without a baseline measurement and tangible steps for addressing the 
accumulation of pending cases, the heads of these agencies may be 
limited in their ability to measure and evaluate success in 
implementing their plans as the President's order requires. 
Accordingly, in moving forward, it will be important for Justice and 
the agencies to continue to refine these plans so that the goal of 
reducing backlogs can be fully realized and the federal government can 
remain responsive to citizen needs. When we complete our ongoing work, 
we expect to provide recommendations to help move this process forward. 

Mr. Chairman, this completes my prepared statement. I would be happy to 
respond to any questions you or other Members of the Subcommittee may 
have at this time. 

Contact and Acknowledgements: 

If you should have questions about this testimony, please contact me at 
(202) 512-6240 or via e-mail at koontzl@gao.gov. Other major 
contributors included Barbara Collier, Vernetta Marquis, Alan 
Stapleton, Shawn Ward, and Elizabeth Zhao. 

Attachment 1: Freedom of Information Act Exemptions: 

The act prescribes nine specific categories of information that is 
exempt from disclosure: 

Exemption Number: (1); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: (A) Specifically authorized under 
criteria established by an Executive Order to be kept secret in the 
interest of national defense or foreign policy and (B) are in fact 
properly classified pursuant to such Executive Order. 

Exemption Number: (2); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Related solely to the internal 
personnel rules and practices of an agency. 

Exemption Number: (3); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Specifically exempted from 
disclosure by statute (other than section 552b of this title), provided 
that such statute (A) requires that matters be withheld from the public 
in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the issue, or (B) 
establishes particular criteria for withholding or refers to particular 
types of matters to be withheld. 

Exemption Number: (4); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Trade secrets and commercial or 
financial information obtained from a person and privileged or 
confidential. 

Exemption Number: (5); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Inter-agency or intra-agency 
memorandums or letters which would not be available by law to a party 
other than an agency in litigation with the agency. 

Exemption Number: (6); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Personnel and medical files and 
similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly 
unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. 

Exemption Number: (7); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Records or information compiled for 
law enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the production of 
such law enforcement records or information: 
(A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with enforcement 
proceedings: 
(B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or impartial 
adjudication: 
(C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion 
of personal privacy: 
(D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a 
confidential source, including a State, local, or foreign agency or 
authority or any private institution which furnished information on a 
confidential basis, and, in the case of  a record or information 
compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a 
criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national 
security intelligence investigation, information furnished by 
confidential source: 
(E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement 
investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law 
enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could 
reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law; or: 
(F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical 
safety of an individual; 

Exemption Number: (8); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Contained in or related to 
examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, 
or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation of 
supervision of financial institutions. 

Exemption Number: (9); 
Matters that are exempt from FOIA: Geological and geophysical 
information and data, including maps, concerning wells.   

Source: 5 U.S.C. § 552(b)(1) through (b)(9). 

[End of table]

Attachment 2. Median Processing Times Reported: 

The attached tables present median processing times as reported by 
agencies in their annual FOIA reports in fiscal years 2004 and 2005. To 
provide context, we include numbers of requests processed for each 
agency or component. We also indicate (in columns headed "±") whether 
the median days to process rose (+), fell (-), or remained unchanged 
(=). (We also use "~" to indicate other types of changes, such as the 
establishment of a new component.) 

Agencies report median processing times according to processing tracks: 
that is, some agencies divide requests into simple and complex 
categories and process these in separate tracks, whereas others use a 
single track. Accordingly, the tables show these tracks where 
applicable. In addition, agencies are required to subject some requests 
to expedited processing, and these are reported as a separate track. 

Tables for the agencies are presented in the following order, which 
corresponds to the order generally used in the figures and tables 
provided in the statement: 

AID; 
Agency for International Development. 

CIA; 
Central Intelligence Agency. 

DHS; 
Department of Homeland Security. 

DOC; 
Department of Commerce. 

DOD; 
Department of Defense. 

DOE; 
Department of Energy. 

DOI; 
Department of the Interior. 

DOJ; 
Department of Justice. 

DOL; 
Department of Labor. 

DOT; 
Department of Transportation. 

ED; 
Department of Education. 

EPA; 
Environmental Protection Agency. 

GSA; 
General Services Administration. 

HHS; 
Department of Health and Human Services. 

HUD; 
Department of Housing and Urban Development. 

NASA; 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration. 

NRC; 
Nuclear Regulatory Commission. 

NSF; 
National Science Foundation. 

OPM; 
Office of Personnel Management. 

SBA; 
Small Business Administration. 

SSA; 
Social Security Administration. 

State; 
Department of State. 

Treas; 
Department of the Treasury. 

USDA; 
Department of Agriculture. 

VA; 
Department of Veterans Affairs. 

[End of table] 

Agency for International Development: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: AID; 
Single: No.: 2004: 209; 
Single: No.: 2005: 196; 
Single: Days: 2004: 54; 
Single: Days: 2005: 55; 
Single: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 3; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 13; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 34; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Central Intelligence Agency: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: CIA; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 501; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 577; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 7; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 7; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 2,834; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2,533; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 63; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 68; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 10; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Homeland Security: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: Office of the Secretary/Privacy Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 279; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 604; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 19; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 16; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 98; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 134; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 66; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 102; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 48; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 9; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 11; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Office of the Inspector General; 
Simple: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 21; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 14; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 44; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 91; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 3; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 5; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of the General Counsel; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1; 
Complex: Days: 2004: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2005: 222; 
Complex: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: ~. 

Component: Information Analysis and Infrastructure Protection; 
Simple: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 51; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 30; 
Complex: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Emergency Preparedness and Response; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 101; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 186; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 14; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 61; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 128; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 345; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 48; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 178; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 28; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 14; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 9; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 45; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Science and Technology; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1; 
Simple: Days: 2004: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2005: 30; 
Simple: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1; 
Complex: Days: 2004: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2005: 210; 
Complex: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: ~. 

Component: U.S. Coast Guard; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 6,735; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 6,035; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 13; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 16; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 638; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 608; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 21; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 21; 
Complex: ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 30; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 11; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 11; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: U.S. Secret Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 912; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 701; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 111; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 149; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services;
Simple: No.: 2004: 105,567; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 85,307; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 16; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 45; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 27,850; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 19,532; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 31; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 55; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 580; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 95; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 8; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 15; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: US-VISIT;
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: 14; 
Simple: Days: 2004: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2005: 17; 
Simple: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1; 
Complex: Days: 2004: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2005: 60; 
Complex: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: ~. 

Component: Border and Transportation Security: CBP; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 2,317; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 3,174; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 20; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 17; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,986; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 3,815; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 30; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 12; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 4; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 890; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 3; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 17; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Border and Transportation Security: TSA; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 828; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 11; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 8; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 16; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,307; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1,199; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 29; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 13; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 2; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 45; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 28; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Border and Transportation Security: ICE; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,124; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 661; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 84; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 35; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 881; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 242; 
Complex: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Border and Transportation Security: FLETC; 
Simple: No.: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,451; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1,834; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 5; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 3; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[A] Component did not exist. 

[End of table] 

Department of Commerce: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: Commerce; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,564; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,321; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 13; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 2; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 465; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 511; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 41; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 40; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 6; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 8; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Defense: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: Defense; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 63,443; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 66,979; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 17; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 16; 
Simple: Days: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 12,972; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 11,385; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 59; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 85; 
Complex: Days: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 841; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 411; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: ±:  -. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Energy: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: National Nuclear Security Administration Service Center 
Albuquerque; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 118; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 76; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 30; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 15; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 99; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 108; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 58; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 170; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bonneville Power Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 54; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 54; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 12; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 20; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Carlsbad Field Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 654; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 20; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 10; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 14; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 35; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 57; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Chicago Operations Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 36; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 21; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 38; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 21; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Golden Field Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 21; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 11; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 14; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 33; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 2; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 20.5; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 66; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Idaho Operations Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 45; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 46; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 11; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 13; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 34; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 34; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 41; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 36; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: National Energy Technology Operations; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 9; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 7; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 20; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 10; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 9; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 26; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 25; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 30; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of Naval Reactors; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: 7; 
Simple: Days: 2004: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2005: 10; 
Simple: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: ~. 

Component: Oak Ridge Operations Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,012; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 971; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 158; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 31; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 139; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 42; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 257; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 112; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 30; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 14; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 7; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 12; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Ohio Environmental Management Consolidated Business Center; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 89; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 156; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 152; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 28; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 10; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: ~. 

Component: Office of Repository Development; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 42; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 71; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 15; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 19; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 29; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 13; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 60; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 73; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Richland Operations Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 190; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 31; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 115; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 18; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Rocky Flats Environmental Management Consolidated Business 
Center; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 794; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 106; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 16; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 916; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Savannah River Operations Office; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 65; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 40; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 61; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 73; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of Scientific and Technical Information; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 3; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 1; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 10; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Southeastern Power Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 3; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: ]Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Southwestern Power Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 5; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 4; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 5; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Strategic Petroleum Reserve; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 13; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 13; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 21; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 82; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 4; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Western Area Power Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 35; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 40; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 10; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 2; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 4; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 20; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 15; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 5; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Department of Energy Headquarters; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 395; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 384; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 81; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 41; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[A] Component did not exist. 

[End of table] 

Department of the Interior: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: Department of the Interior; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 4,126; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 6,206; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 3-834; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 2-43; 
Simple: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 30; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 189; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 0-99; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 28-89; 
Complex: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 63; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 25; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 2-64; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1-15; 
Expedited: ±: ~. 

Component: Office of the Secretary; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: 99; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 89; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 64; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Office of the Inspector General; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 834; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 7; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 2; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Office of the Solicitor; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 15; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 18; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of Surface mining; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 21; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 13; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 55; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Minerals Management Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 22; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 28; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 14; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bureau of Land Management; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 23; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: 56; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 57; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 6; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Fish and Wildlife Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 35; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 29; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 10; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 15; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: National Park Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 20; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 19; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 10; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bureau of Reclamation; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 20; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 18; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 8; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: U.S. Geological Survey; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 14; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bureau of Indian Affairs; 
Simple: No.: 2004: (a); 
Simple: No.: 2005: (a); 
Simple: Days: 2004: 158; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 43; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: (a); 
Complex: No.: 2005: (a); 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: (a); 
Expedited: No.: 2005: (a); 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[A] Statistics not broken down by component. 

Note: The Department of Interior reported the number of requests 
processed as a department, not by individual components. 

[End of table] 

Department of Justice: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

[See PDF for Image] 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[A] Component did not exist. 

[B] In addition to the expedited track, the FBI maintains three tracks 
for requests: small (0 to 500 pages), medium (501 to 2,500 pages), and 
large (more than 2,500 pages). The former is reported in the "simple 
requests" category; the latter two are reported as "complex requests." 
Therefore FBI's complex requests were excluded from analysis: 

[C] Justice Management Division used average days opposed to median 
days, so it was excluded: 

[End of table] 

Department of Labor: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

[See PDF for Image] 

[End of table] 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

Department of Transportation: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: Office of the Secretary of Transportation; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 320; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 150; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 1; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 1; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 394; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 87; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 82; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 77; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 10; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 30; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of the Inspector General; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 60; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 50; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 6; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 8; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 46; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 34; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 51; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 64; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 3; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 57; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Federal Aviation Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 5,162; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 4,401; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 4; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 3; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 2,231; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2,179; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 31; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 28; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 45; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 46; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 8; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 9; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Federal Highway Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 331; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 294; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 9; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 16; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 30; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 31; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 30; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 134; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 17; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 13; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Federal Railroad Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 524; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 451; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 95; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 90; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 367; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 263; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 23; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 20; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Federal Transit Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 192; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 199; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 68; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 29; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 36; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 33; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 20; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Maritime Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 124; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 30; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 155; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 30; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Research and Special programs Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 85; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 42; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 19; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 15; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 89; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 75; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 135; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 40; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 11; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 5; 
Expedited: ±: =. 

Component: Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 778; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 823; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 58; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 31; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bureau of Transportation Statistics; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 46; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 67; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 5; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 11; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 6; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 20; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Education: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: Education; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,566; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,874; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 0-30; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 35; 
Simple: Days: ±: ~; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 442; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 329; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 2-134; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 66; 
Complex: Days: ±: ~; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 74; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 16; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 3-21; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 24; 
Expedited: Days: ±: ~. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Environmental Protection Agency: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: Headquarters; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 2,188; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,717; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 19; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 19; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 42; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 170; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 58; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 6; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 16; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 20; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Region 1 New England Region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 317; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 249; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 19; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 118; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 29; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 46; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 2 New Jersey, New York, Puerto Rico, U.S. Virgin 
Islands and 7 Tribal nations; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 2,949; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,912; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 27; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 30; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 7; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 49; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 40; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 9; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 8; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Region 3 Mid-Atlantic; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,748; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,699; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 15; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 13; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 9; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 4; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 7; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 4 Southeast region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,034; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 852; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 21; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 19; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 5; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 71; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 75; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 41; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 6; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 5 Mid-West Region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 2,011; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,920; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 18; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 2; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 3; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 70; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 30; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 6 South Central Region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 860; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 624; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 32; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 353; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 109; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 7 America's Heartland Region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 651; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 767; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 23; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 27; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 166; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 8 Mountains and Plains Region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 387; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 332; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 13; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 15; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 9 Pacific Southwest; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 725; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 588; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 16; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 18; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 39; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 38; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 6; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Region 10 Pacific Northwest Region; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 454; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 273; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 20; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 20; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 19; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 27; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

General Services Administration: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: GSA. 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a;
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: Days: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,182; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1,561; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 14; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 14; 
Complex: Days: ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited:±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Health and Human Services: 

Two tables are provided for this department, because its components 
report both multitrack (simple and complex) processing and single-track 
processing. 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

[See PDF for Image] 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[A] Component did not exist. 

[End of table] 

Department of Housing and Urban Development: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: Headquarters; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,676; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 984; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 95; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 65; 
Simple: ±: - ; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 248; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 271; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 161; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 160; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 70; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 74; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 42; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 22; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Field; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,510; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,150; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 21; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 21; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 10; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 15; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 30; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 35; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 95; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 160; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 23; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 70; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Office of Inspector General; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 354; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 254; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 55; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 45; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 15; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 15; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 9; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 9; 
Expedited: ±: =. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

National Aeronautics and Space Administration: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: NASA; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,069; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 938; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 19; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 454; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 410;
Complex: Days: 2004: 33; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 49; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 44; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 3; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 26; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 15; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Nuclear Regulatory Commission: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: NRC; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 357; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 303; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 11; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 12; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 27; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 28; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 47; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 75; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 14; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 60; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 20; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

National Science Foundation: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: NSF; 
Single: No.: 2004: 309; 
Single: No.: 2005: 266; 
Single: Days: 2004: 20; 
Single: Days: 2005: 14; 
Single: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Office of Personnel Management: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: OPM; 
Single: No.: 2004: 9,310; 
Single: No.: 2005: 10,898; 
Single: Days: 2004: 9; 
Single: Days: 2005: 14; 
Single: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 2; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Small Business Administration: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: SBA; 
Single: No.: 2004: 1,927; 
Single: No.: 2005: 3,737; 
Single: Days: 2004: 5; 
Single: Days: 2005: 7; 
Single: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Social Security Administration: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: SSA; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 397; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 364; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 19; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 15; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 882; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1,014; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 37; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 39; 
Complex: Days: ±: +. 

Agency: SSA; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,321; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,555; 
Simple: Days: 2004:14; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 10; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 31; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 17; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

Note: The tables exclude SSA's category of "simple requests handled by 
non-FOIA staff" and "simple request for Social Security number 
applications and other Office of Earnings Operations records." The 
category SSA labels "fast track" was reported under "single track." 

[End of table] 

Department of State: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Agency: State; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,236; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,647; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 6; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 14; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 3,710; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2,216; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 209; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 142; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 17; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 7; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 184; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 136; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of the Treasury: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: The Departmental Offices; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 332; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 307; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 2; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 2; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 782; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 790; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 172; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 251; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 168; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 86; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 201; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 17; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 78; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 93; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 322; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 4,635; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 2; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 8,030; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 179; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 50; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 73; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bureau of Engraving and Printing; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 69; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 76; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 4; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 3; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 44; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 12; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 60; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 31; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Financial Management Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 529; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 351; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 7; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 10; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Internal Revenue Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 51,985; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 42,533; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 21; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 21; 
Complex: ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: United States Mint; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 67; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 316; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 15; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 15; 
Complex:  ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Bureau of the Public Debt; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 91; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 90; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 4; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 3; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of Thrift Supervision; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,827; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 4,003; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 15; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 12; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 2; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 208; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 4; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 256; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 161; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 172; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 30; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 10; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Financial Crimes Enforcement Network; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 6; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 32; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 122; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 99; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 95; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Agriculture: 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

Component: Agricultural Marketing Service; Simple: No.: 2004: 139; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 120; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 19; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 22; 
Simple: Days: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 435; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 922; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 77; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 90; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 59; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 193; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 800; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 1,277; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 37; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 20; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 53; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 40; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Departmental Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 47; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 53; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 35; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 29; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 7; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Farm Service Agency; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 32; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 44; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 16; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 14; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Food, Nutrition and Consumer Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 190; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 137; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 6; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 15; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Farm Service Agency; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 30,430; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 41,743; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 14; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 2; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 22,377; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1,155; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 54; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 10; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 476; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 247; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 13; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 1; 
Expedited: ±: -. 

Component: Forest Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 1,846; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 1,426; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 15; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 18; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,807; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 2,196; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 21; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 18; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 42; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 8; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 14; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Food Safety and Inspection Service; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 544; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 26; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 535; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 73; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 52; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 113; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 8; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 23; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 44; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 5; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 8; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: National Appeals Division; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 322; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 358; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 15; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 18; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 6; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 12; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 17; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 16; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 2; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 4; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 9; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Office of Budget and Program Analysis; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 4; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 7; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 1; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 2; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of Communications; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 339; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 303; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 18; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 24; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of the Chief Financial Officer; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 36; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 19; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 15; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 16; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of the Chief Information Officer; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 2; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 10; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 1; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 10; 
Simple: ±: +; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 0; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 0; 
Complex: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Complex: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Complex: ±: [Empty]; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of Civil Rights; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 82; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 43; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 15; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 28; 
Complex: ±: +; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of General Counsel; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 12; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 12; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 34; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 34; 
Complex: ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Office of the Inspector General; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 133; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 178; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 5; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 4; 
Simple: ±: -; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 47; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 58; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 112; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 102; 
Complex: ±: - ; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 7; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 3; 
Expedited: ±: +. 

Component: Research, Education and Economics; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 87; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 15; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 164; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 115; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 15; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 15; 
Complex: ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 4; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: 15; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Risk Management Agency; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 73; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 57; 
Simple: Days: 2004: 20; 
Simple: Days: 2005: 20; 
Simple: ±: =; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 7; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 25; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 60; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 40; 
Complex: ±: -; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 1; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: 5; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

Component: Rural Development; 
Simple: No.: 2004: 0; 
Simple: No.: 2005: 0; 
Simple: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Simple: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Simple: ±: [Empty]; 
Complex: No.: 2004: 1,484; 
Complex: No.: 2005: 1,623; 
Complex: Days: 2004: 12; 
Complex: Days: 2005: 12; 
Complex: ±: =; 
Expedited: No.: 2004: 0; 
Expedited: No.: 2005: 0; 
Expedited: Days: 2004: n/a; 
Expedited: Days: 2005: n/a; 
Expedited: ±: [Empty]. 

+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[End of table] 

Department of Veterans Affairs: 

The department reports all processing in one track, but it refers to 
this track as complex, rather than single track. 

No. = number of requests processed; Days = median days to process; ± = 
change from 2004 to 2005: 

[See PDF for Image]
+ increase: 

- decrease: 

= no change: 

~ other change (change in reporting, new component, etc.) 

Sources: Annual FOIA report, GAO analysis. 

[A] Component did not exist. 

[End of table] 

FOOTNOTES 

[1] See 5 U.S.C. § 552. 

[2] Executive Order 13392, Improving Agency Disclosure of Information 
(Washington, D.C.: Dec. 14, 2005). 

[3] The agencies included are listed in table 2; these agencies are the 
24 agencies covered by the Chief Financial Officers Act, plus the 
Central Intelligence Agency. 

[4] Two GAO analysts independently analyzed each agency's plan to 
determine if it contained objective goals and timetables for reducing 
the backlog. When the analysts disagreed, they discussed the reasons 
for their differences and arrived at a consensus. 

[5] We exclude SSA's statistics from our discussion of requests 
received, requests processed, and their disposition, because a change 
in the agency's counting methodology resulted in a report of over 17 
million requests for fiscal year 2005, for a jump of about 16 million 
from the year before. Including these statistics in the governmentwide 
data would obscure year-to-year comparisons. This issue is discussed 
further on page 

[6] These statistics include numbers reported by SSA, because they are 
not affected by the approximately 17 million requests mentioned in 
footnote 5, for which SSA does not keep statistics on processing times 
or pending requests. 

[7] The act has been amended several times. 

[8] Fees may be waived when requests are determined to be in the public 
interest. 

[9] See 5 U.S.C. § 552a. 

[10] According to SSA, its field organization is decentralized to 
provide services at the local level, and includes 10 regional offices, 
6 processing centers, and approximately 1500 field offices. 

[11] This provision was added by the Freedom of Information Reform Act 
of 1986 (Pub. L. 99-570). 

[12] See OMB, Uniform Freedom of Information Act Fee Schedule and 
Guidelines, 52 FR 10011 (Mar. 27, 1987), effective April 27, 1987. Also 
in 1987, the Department of Justice issued guidelines on waiving fees 
when requests are determined to be in the public interest. Under the 
guidelines, requests for waivers or reduction of fees are to be 
considered on a case-by-case basis, taking into account both the public 
interest and the requester's commercial interests. 

[13] 5 U.S.C.§ 552(e). 

[14] GAO, Information Management: Progress in Implementing the 1996 
Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments, GAO-01-378 
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 16, 2001). 

[15] GAO, Information Management: Update on Implementation of the 1996 
Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments, GAO-02-493 
(Washington, D.C.: Aug. 30, 2002); Information Management: Update on 
Freedom of Information Act Implementation Status, GAO-04-257 
(Washington, D.C.: Feb. 18, 2004); and Information Management: 
Implementation of the Freedom of Information Act, GAO-05-648T 
(Washington, D.C.: May 11, 2005). 

[16] According to SSA officials, most of these simple requests are for 
essentially the same types of information, such as copies of earnings 
records and verifications of monthly benefit amounts or Social Security 
numbers. The agency considers these requests to be covered by the 
Privacy Act and by FOIA; requests covered by both acts are to be 
reported in agencies' annual FOIA reports. 

[17] Denials can occur in the case of discrepancies in the requests, 
such as incorrect Social Security numbers, for example. 

[18] See GAO, Information Management: Progress in Implementing the 1996 
Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments, GAO-01-378 
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 16, 2001), and Information Management: Update 
on Freedom of Information Act Implementation Status, GAO-04-257 
(Washington, D.C.: Feb. 18, 2004). 

[19] The Executive Order refers to "requests for records [that] have 
not been responded to within the statutory time limit (backlog)." The 
statute sets a time limit of 20 business days for agencies to determine 
whether to comply with a FOIA request. The law does not set a specific 
deadline for providing releasable records (although it does require 
agencies to make them available promptly), but in practice, agencies 
generally respond to requesters in one step--by providing or denying 
records--rather than in two steps--notifying requesters of their 
determination of whether to comply and if so providing records. In 
keeping with this practice, agencies have interpreted the Executive 
Order as referring to responses that provide or deny records, rather 
than responses providing a determination. 

Justice officials told us in 2001 that, as a practical matter, they 
consider the FOIA requirement to report data on median processing days 
to be the basis for measuring compliance with the 20-day requirement. 
GAO, Information Management: Progress in Implementing the 1996 
Electronic Freedom of Information Act Amendments, GAO-01-378 
(Washington, D.C.: Mar. 16, 2001). 

[20] The Executive Order states that plans shall include "specific 
activities that the agency will implement to eliminate or reduce the 
agency's FOIA backlog," as well as "concrete milestones, with specific 
timetables and outcomes to be achieved;" these milestones will be such 
that they can be used to "measure and evaluate the agency's success in 
the implementation of the plan." 

[21] According to Justice's guidance, "Agencies should consider a 
number of measures of timeliness, including number of pending requests, 
median processing times, average processing times (in addition, if that 
is feasible), number of requests processed in a year, duration of 
oldest pending requests, etc." "In determining such appropriate 
measurements, agencies should be able to carefully determine which ones 
best fit their individual circumstances, which can vary greatly from 
one agency to another."

GAO's Mission: 

The Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of 
Congress, exists to support Congress in meeting its constitutional 
responsibilities and to help improve the performance and accountability 
of the federal government for the American people. GAO examines the use 
of public funds; evaluates federal programs and policies; and provides 
analyses, recommendations, and other assistance to help Congress make 
informed oversight, policy, and funding decisions. GAO's commitment to 
good government is reflected in its core values of accountability, 
integrity, and reliability. 

Obtaining Copies of GAO Reports and Testimony: 

The fastest and easiest way to obtain copies of GAO documents at no 
cost is through the Internet. GAO's Web site ( www.gao.gov ) contains 
abstracts and full-text files of current reports and testimony and an 
expanding archive of older products. The Web site features a search 
engine to help you locate documents using key words and phrases. You 
can print these documents in their entirety, including charts and other 
graphics. 

Each day, GAO issues a list of newly released reports, testimony, and 
correspondence. GAO posts this list, known as "Today's Reports," on its 
Web site daily. The list contains links to the full-text document 
files. To have GAO e-mail this list to you every afternoon, go to 
www.gao.gov and select "Subscribe to e-mail alerts" under the "Order 
GAO Products" heading. 

Order by Mail or Phone: 

The first copy of each printed report is free. Additional copies are $2 
each. A check or money order should be made out to the Superintendent 
of Documents. GAO also accepts VISA and Mastercard. Orders for 100 or 
more copies mailed to a single address are discounted 25 percent. 
Orders should be sent to: 

U.S. Government Accountability Office 

441 G Street NW, Room LM 

Washington, D.C. 20548: 

To order by Phone: 

Voice: (202) 512-6000: 

TDD: (202) 512-2537: 

Fax: (202) 512-6061: 

To Report Fraud, Waste, and Abuse in Federal Programs: 

Contact: 

Web site: www.gao.gov/fraudnet/fraudnet.htm 

E-mail: fraudnet@gao.gov 

Automated answering system: (800) 424-5454 or (202) 512-7470: 

Public Affairs: 

Jeff Nelligan, managing director, 

NelliganJ@gao.gov 

(202) 512-4800 

U.S. Government Accountability Office, 

441 G Street NW, Room 7149 

Washington, D.C. 20548: