3 Total Action(s)
As a result of GAO's August 2012 report, Entrepreneurial Assistance: Opportunities Exist to Improve Programs' Collaboration, Data-Tracking, and Performance Management (GAO-12-819), GAO is no longer assessing this action. In February 2012, GAO reported that it expected to recommend in a subsequent report that Congress tie funding more closely to a program's demonstrated effectiveness. However, based on additional analysis, GAO concluded that agency performance and evaluation information had a number of deficiencies. As a result, GAO recommended in August 2012 that the Secretaries of Commerce, Housing and Urban Development, and Agriculture and the Administrator of the Small Business Administration consistently collect information that would enable them to track the specific type of assistance programs provide and the entrepreneurs they serve and use this information to help administer their programs. Such performance information is needed before Congress can more closely link funding decisions with the programs' effectiveness.
As of May 2020, the four agencies--HUD, Commerce, SBA, and USDA--had taken some steps to improve program evaluation and collect information to help track program activities and administer programs that support entrepreneurs, as GAO recommended in August 2012. For example, according to HUD, the department implemented improvements to its Integrated Disbursement and Information System in 2012, which were intended to upgrade HUD's ability to track Community Development Block Grant grantee progress in implementing activities and gather improved data with regard to performance. In addition, HUD completed an extensive block grant data clean-up effort in response to a February 2013 HUD Inspector General audit. In November 2014, HUD noted that the department had resolved more than 99 percent of the activities and 98 percent of the funds questioned by the OIG.
According to Commerce's Economic Development Administration (EDA), in May 2020 the Office of Management and Budget approved its revised information collection instruments, which are designed to gather comprehensive information on program outputs (activities) and outcomes from all of EDA's non-infrastructure program recipients (including entrepreneurs served and type of assistance provided). EDA planned to fully implement the updated information collection instruments in fiscal year 2020.
According to SBA, in August 2017 the agency finalized a program evaluation framework that outlines the structure of the agency's program evaluation function, defines roles and responsibilities, and establishes guiding principles. SBA also noted that the agency published evaluation reports for seven programs and initiatives under the framework as of February 2018. In addition, SBA stated that the agency has requested authority from Congress to collect unique client data from the resource partners, including Small Business Development Centers and Women's Business Centers, for internal evaluation purposes.
USDA's Rural Business-Cooperative Service stated in September 2019 that it conducts a management control review of each program. These reviews are intended to evaluate the effectiveness of administrative operations, identify weaknesses or deficiencies in program and administrative operations, and identify the effectiveness of management controls in Rural Development, among other things. In addition, USDA/RBS state that offices conduct state internal reviews of each field office and centralized program functions at least once every 5 years. These reviews are comprehensive evaluations of the delivery of programs and administrative functions in field offices and centralized program functions within a state.
Finally, Commerce, USDA, and SBA participated in the Office of Management and Budget chaired Evaluating Business Technical Assistance Program interagency working group, which publically released its guide titled Building Smarter Data for Evaluating Business Assistance Programs: A Guide for Practitioners in May 2017. The guide identifies critical data and best practices that support the use and improvement of administrative data and other existing data sources for rigorous impact evaluations.
The initiatives described above should help the agencies improve the collection of information on the assistance provided to entrepreneurs, and the evaluation of programs that provide such assistance. It will be important for the agencies to follow through on them.
The four agencies and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) have taken steps to collaborate more in administering these programs, as GAO recommended in August 2012. In March 2017, Commerce's Economic Development Administration (EDA) noted that it established an economic development integration team in fiscal year 2016 to facilitate direct engagement between communities and federal agencies with complementary economic development resources to collaboratively support regional economic development across the nation. EDA added that the team has executed a memoranda of understanding (MOU) with HUD's Office of Community Planning and Development and USDA Rural Development and is working with SBA to collaborate, enhance relationships, and cross-promote resources. USDA's Rural Business-Cooperative Service (RBS) noted in March 2017 that it is engaged in several MOUs with other federal agencies that support coordination and collaboration on areas of mutual interest, including a MOU with Commerce's EDA to leverage programs and resources to support regional economic development. In addition, RBS noted that it is coordinating with HUD and others to leverage programs and resources to create healthy, economically vibrant neighborhoods through the development of local food systems. In March 2017, SBA noted that it has engaged in a number of collaborative efforts with the other agencies, including the development of a training module for small construction contractors with HUD enabling them to access performance bonds for HUD-funded construction projects, and a MOU between SBA's Office of Veterans Business Development and USDA to explore opportunities for supporting veteran-owned businesses in agriculture-related sectors. Finally, in November 2016 OMB noted that, in fiscal year 2016, the General Services Administration took over the management of BusinessUSA, a federal website developed to make it easier for businesses to access the services and information they need. Through the website, federal agencies are able to increase public awareness of the resources they offer. OMB added that GSA has integrated BusinessUSA's content and services in the USA.gov website. This provides users with a more accessible and centralized one-stop platform for entrepreneurs to access the services that could help them grow. Finally, the BusinessUSA Steering Committee, composed of staff from across several agencies, continues to meet regularly and assemble agency stakeholders to collect feedback and create the strategic vision for moving the tool forward.