Survey of Local Growth Issues

Survey of Local Growth Issues (RCED-00-272, September 2000)

Was water-sewer infrastructure one of the two types of federal funding that were funded at levels lower than needed and therefore most hindered your ability to plan for and manage growth? Number of Cases

Not chosen One of two top choices

Counties Total 82.3 17.7 609

Rural 74.5 25.5 165

Nonrural 85.1 14.9 444

Central 0 0 0

Noncentral 0 0 0

Cities Total 87.2 12.8 949

Rural 0 0 0

Nonrural 0 0 0

Central 84.5 15.5 414

Noncentral 89.3 10.7 535

	Was water-sewer infrastructure one of the two types of federal funding that were funded at levels lower than needed and therefore most hindered your ability to plan for and manage growth?	Number of Cases
Counties	Total	82.3	17.7	609
Rural	74.5	25.5	165
Nonrural	85.1	14.9	444
Central	0	0	0
Noncentral	0	0	0
Cities	Total	87.2	12.8	949
Rural	0	0	0
Nonrural	0	0	0
Central	84.5	15.5	414
Noncentral	89.3	10.7	535

Note: The percentages in each row add to 100.

To return to the previous page, use the back arrow on your tool bar.

		Was water-sewer infrastructure one of the two types of federal funding that were funded at levels lower than needed and therefore most hindered your ability to plan for and manage growth?		Number of Cases
		Not chosen	One of two top choices	Number of Cases
Counties	Total	82.3	17.7	609
	Rural	74.5	25.5	165
	Nonrural	85.1	14.9	444
	Central	0	0	0
	Noncentral	0	0	0
Cities	Total	87.2	12.8	949
	Rural	0	0	0
	Nonrural	0	0	0
	Central	84.5	15.5	414
	Noncentral	89.3	10.7	535