Survey of Local Growth Issues

Survey of Local Growth Issues (RCED-00-272, September 2000)

Was transportation alternatives (e.g., bicycle/pedestrian facilities) one of the two types of federal funding that were funded at levels lower than needed and therefore most hindered your ability to plan for and manage growth? Number of Cases

Not chosen One of two top choices

Counties Total 96.1 3.9 609

Rural 98.2 1.8 165

Nonrural 95.3 4.7 444

Central 0 0 0

Noncentral 0 0 0

Cities Total 90.7 9.3 949

Rural 0 0 0

Nonrural 0 0 0

Central 91.8 8.2 414

Noncentral 89.9 10.1 535

	Was transportation alternatives (e.g., bicycle/pedestrian facilities) one of the two types of federal funding that were funded at levels lower than needed and therefore most hindered your ability to plan for and manage growth?	Number of Cases
Counties	Total	96.1	3.9	609
Rural	98.2	1.8	165
Nonrural	95.3	4.7	444
Central	0	0	0
Noncentral	0	0	0
Cities	Total	90.7	9.3	949
Rural	0	0	0
Nonrural	0	0	0
Central	91.8	8.2	414
Noncentral	89.9	10.1	535

Note: The percentages in each row add to 100.

To return to the previous page, use the back arrow on your tool bar.

		Was transportation alternatives (e.g., bicycle/pedestrian facilities) one of the two types of federal funding that were funded at levels lower than needed and therefore most hindered your ability to plan for and manage growth?		Number of Cases
		Not chosen	One of two top choices	Number of Cases
Counties	Total	96.1	3.9	609
	Rural	98.2	1.8	165
	Nonrural	95.3	4.7	444
	Central	0	0	0
	Noncentral	0	0	0
Cities	Total	90.7	9.3	949
	Rural	0	0	0
	Nonrural	0	0	0
	Central	91.8	8.2	414
	Noncentral	89.9	10.1	535