U.S. GAO - Federal Economic Development Funding (GAO-06-436sp)

Federal Economic Development Funding (GAO-06-436sp)

Return to Table of Contents
 
Small Business Loans (59.012) obligations in South Dakota by county and program
Dollars and shares using Dominant RUCA

County Dominant RUCA Category Total Obligations (FY2002-2004)
Aurora County Rural 165,750
Beadle County Rural 2,839,381
Bennett County Rural 127,500
Bon Homme County Rural 182,580
Brookings County Rural 1,766,300
Brown County Rural 2,098,790
Brule County Rural 538,903
Butte County Rural 447,750
Charles Mix County Rural 1,956,778
Clay County Rural 587,500
Codington County Rural 3,279,575
Corson County Rural 85,000
Custer County Rural 770,140
Davison County Rural 1,132,895
Day County Rural 441,975
Deuel County Rural 409,500
Dewey County Rural 747,500
Douglas County Rural 175,700
Edmunds County Rural 13,450
Fall River County Rural 722,000
Faulk County Rural 51,000
Grant County Rural 506,850
Gregory County Rural 392,700
Haakon County Rural 427,250
Hamlin County Rural 138,400
Hand County Rural 36,380
Hanson County Rural 17,000
Harding County Rural 64,600
Hughes County Rural 911,135
Hutchinson County Rural 598,000
Hyde County Rural 55,760
Jackson County Rural 184,875
Jerauld County Rural 210,750
Kingsbury County Rural 662,000
Lake County Rural 1,159,859
Lawrence County Rural 3,284,353
Lincoln County Urban 5,821,938
Lyman County Rural 261,764
Marshall County Rural 310,650
McCook County Rural 1,907,450
McPherson County Rural 5,000
Meade County Rural 1,465,811
Mellette County Rural 153,750
Minnehaha County Urban 20,922,961
Moody County Rural 91,665
Pennington County Urban 8,955,906
Perkins County Rural 901,010
Potter County Rural 562,500
Roberts County Rural 483,175
Sanborn County Rural 269,875
Spink County Rural 93,500
Stanley County Rural 368,105
Sully County Rural 126,000
Todd County Rural 46,750
Tripp County Rural 415,045
Turner County Rural 660,050
Union County Urban 1,100,875
Walworth County Rural 543,850
Yankton County Rural 1,268,170

For a more detailed discussion of our scope and methodology and additional details see "Rural Economic Development: More Assurance Is Needed That Grant Funding Information Is Accurately Reported."
(GAO-06-294)