Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "Threat levels"

    1 publication with a total of 5 open recommendations including 5 priority recommendations
    Director: Courts, Michael J
    Phone: (202) 512-8980

    5 open recommendations
    including 5 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve the consistency and data reliability of Department of State risk management data, the Secretary of State should direct the Under Secretary for Management to identify and eliminate inconsistencies between and within the Foreign Affairs Manual, Foreign Affairs Handbook (FAH), and other guidance concerning physical security.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: State has taken steps to revise sections of the Foreign Affairs Manual and Foreign Affairs Handbook related to physical security through the Security Standards Committee. The committee, which is made up of DS and OBO officials, meet weekly to create and revise physical security standards, as needed. In addition, DS officials review all relevant sections of the FAM and FAH each year. However, as of March 2017, State has not provided evidence that it has conducted a comprehensive review of all physical security guidance to identify inconsistencies.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the applicability and effectiveness of the Department of State's physical security standards, the Secretary of State should work through DS or, in his capacity as chair, through the OSPB to clarify existing flexibilities in the FAH to ensure that security and life-safety updates to the OSPB standards and Physical Security Handbook are updated through an expedited review process.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: State is in the process of revising the OSPB Working Group Guidelines in the FAH to clarify existing flexibilities for and to formalize an expedited process for making security and life-safety updates to the OSPB standards and Physical Security Handbook. As of April 2017 this action had not been completed, and State now expects to complete this action by the end of calendar year 2017.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the applicability and effectiveness of the Department of State's physical security standards, the Secretary of State should work through DS or, in his capacity as chair, through the OSPB to develop a process to routinely review all OSPB standards and the Physical Security Handbook to determine if the standards adequately address evolving threats and risks.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: Although State has not developed a process to routinely review all OSPB standards and the Physical Security Handbook to determine if the standards adequately address evolving threats and risks, officials agree with the intent of the recommendation and are taking actions to address it. For example, State?s Security Standards Committee, which is made up of DS and OBO officials, meet weekly to create and revise physical security standards, as needed. In addition, DS officials conduct an annual review of all the relevant sections of the FAM and FAH, which includes the OSPB standards and the Physical Security Handbook. However, as of March 2017, State had not provided evidence proving that it specifically considers evolving threats and risks when reviewing OSPB standards and the Physical Security Handbook.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the applicability and effectiveness of the Department of State's physical security standards, the Secretary of State should work through DS or, in his capacity as chair, through the OSPB to develop a policy for the use of interim and temporary facilities that includes definitions for such facilities, time frames for use, and a routine process for reassessing the interim or temporary designation.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: State is taking a number of actions to regularly reassess the risk that various posts and facilities face. For example, Regional Security Officers are required to conduct a physical security review for every work facility at least once a year at high-threat, high-risk posts, and every three years at all other posts. State also now conducts an annual process, the Vital Presence Validation Process, to reassess the risk taken to operate at each of the high-threat, high-risk posts. However, as of March 2017, it is unclear whether temporary and interim facilities are being reviewed and reassessed during these or other processes.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the effectiveness of the Department of State's risk management policies, the Secretary of State should develop a risk management policy and procedures for ensuring the physical security of diplomatic facilities, including roles and responsibilities of all stakeholders and a routine feedback process that continually incorporates new information.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: State has created a working group to draft a revision to the risk management policy. As of April 2017, State anticipates that the update will be published in 2018.