Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "Tax return audits"

    18 publications with a total of 64 open recommendations including 4 priority recommendations
    Director: James R. McTigue Jr.
    Phone: (202) 512-9110

    14 open recommendations
    Recommendation: As LB&I finishes implementing its new approach and decides which selection methods will be used with the campaigns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the documentation gaps in policies and procedures are addressed for six internal control principles for the selection methods that will be used, including defining objectives to identify risk and defining risk tolerances.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: As LB&I finishes implementing its new approach and decides which selection methods will be used with the campaigns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the documentation gaps in policies and procedures are addressed for six internal control principles for the selection methods that will be used, including identifying, analyzing, and responding to risks to achieving the objectives.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: As LB&I finishes implementing its new approach and decides which selection methods will be used with the campaigns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the documentation gaps in policies and procedures are addressed for six internal control principles for the selection methods that will be used, including designing control activities to achieve objectives and responding to risks.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: As LB&I finishes implementing its new approach and decides which selection methods will be used with the campaigns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the documentation gaps in policies and procedures are addressed for six internal control principles for the selection methods that will be used, including using quality information to achieve objectives.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: As LB&I finishes implementing its new approach and decides which selection methods will be used with the campaigns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the documentation gaps in policies and procedures are addressed for six internal control principles for the selection methods that will be used, including communicating internally the necessary quality information about the objectives.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: As LB&I finishes implementing its new approach and decides which selection methods will be used with the campaigns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the documentation gaps in policies and procedures are addressed for six internal control principles for the selection methods that will be used, including evaluating issues and remediating identified internal control deficiencies on a timely basis.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: Also in accordance with federal internal control standards, the Commissioner should direct LB&I to adopt a standard process for monitoring audit selection decisions in the field, such as by modifying the existing quality control system.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should create a timetable with specific dates for implementing its new compliance approach.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should establish metrics to help determine whether the campaign effort overall meets LB&I's goals.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should finalize and document plans to evaluate the human resources expended on campaign activities.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should document lessons learned from stakeholder input and past performance.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should monitor overall performance across future campaigns, not just individual compliance projects, and in doing so ensure that the data used for monitoring accounts for the costs beyond the auditor's time can clearly be linked with specific selection methods, including the Discriminant Analysis System method, to the extent that the selection methods continue to operate.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should develop and document criteria to use in choosing selection methods for campaigns using audits.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: To further ensure that the new campaigns under LB&I's new approach for addressing tax compliance are implemented successfully, the Commissioner should set a timetable to analyze and mitigate risks and document specific metrics for assessing mitigation of identified risks.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Director: Rebecca Shea
    Phone: (202) 512-2834

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To maximize resources for the Inland Waterways Trust Fund, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should consult with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to explore options to obtain proprietary data to enhance IRS's efforts to ensure taxpayer compliance with the inland waterways fuel tax.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Director: Jessica Lucas-Judy
    Phone: (202) 512-9110

    7 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should establish, document, and implement an organizational structure identifying responsibility for defining objectives with an appropriate line of reporting for measuring costs and results for information referrals.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of January 2017, IRS has taken some action to implement this recommendation. IRS told us it established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to conduct a comprehensive review of IRS's referral programs, including the information referral process. IRS completed its review and plan for the organizational structure in December 2016. The Wage and Investment division will retain the intake and screening responsibilities. The Small Business and Self-Employed division will be responsible for defining objectives and monitoring results for information referrals. We continue to monitor IRS implementation of the planned cost and results measurement and reporting.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the IRM has internal controls for processing information referrals by establishing, documenting, and implementing supervisory review and segregation of duties for inventory management reporting procedures.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of January 2017, IRS has taken some action on this recommendation. IRS told us it established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to conduct a comprehensive review of IRS's referral programs, including the information referral process. IRS completed its review and plan for the organizational structure in December 2016. Once IRS approves the organizational structure, IRS will document new and updated screening and routing procedures in the Internal Revenue Manual as well as guidance for the Image Control Team and other IRS units receiving information referrals. IRS plans to implement this recommendation by September 2017.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the IRM has internal controls for processing information referrals by establishing, documenting, and implementing ongoing monitoring of information referrals retained for destruction, including a mechanism for tracking the reasons referrals were retained prior to destruction.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of January 2017, IRS has taken some action to implement this recommendation. IRS told us it established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to conduct a comprehensive review of IRS's referral programs, including the information referral process. IRS completed its review and plan for the organizational structure in December 2016. Once IRS approves the organizational structure, IRS will establish and document Internal Revenue Manual procedures, including criteria for retaining information referrals for destruction. IRS plans to implement this recommendation by September 2017.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the IRM has internal controls for processing information referrals by establishing, documenting, and implementing procedures for each IRS operating unit receiving information referrals to provide feedback on the number and types of referrals misrouted and on their disposition, and a mechanism to analyze patterns of misroute errors.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of January 2017, IRS has taken some action to implement this recommendation. IRS told us it established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to conduct a comprehensive review of IRS's referral programs, including the information referral process. IRS completed its review and plan for the organizational structure in December 2016. Once IRS approves the organizational structure, IRS will establish and document Internal Revenue Manual procedures, including guidelines for IRS units receiving information referrals. IRS plans to implement this recommendation by September 2017.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should establish a coordination mechanism to facilitate communication and information sharing across IRS referral programs on crosscutting tax issues and ways to improve efficiency in the mechanisms for public reporting of possible tax violations.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, IRS had taken some action to establish a coordination mechanism to help IRS referral programs communicate and share information, as GAO recommended in its February 2016 report. IRS established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to comprehensively review IRS's referral programs. Among other things, this team is to explore aligning all IRS referral programs within an organizational structure to more efficiently coordinate, communicate, and share information across the referral programs by December 2017. As of March 2017, the Deputy Commissioner of Services and Enforcement directed the largest recipient of referrals to facilitate quarterly meetings in order to improve communication and information sharing across multiple IRS referral programs. The meetings are scheduled to begin by summer 2017.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should direct the referral programs to establish a mechanism to coordinate on a plan and timeline for developing a consolidated, online referral submission in order to better position IRS to leverage specialized expertise while exploring options to further consolidate the initial screening operations.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of March 2017, IRS had taken some action to establish a mechanism to coordinate on a plan and timeline for developing a consolidated, online referral submission, as GAO recommended in its February 2016 report. IRS established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to comprehensively review IRS's referral programs. Among other things, the team has explored options to consolidate the initial screening operations and determine the scope and complexity for moving the referral process to an online format. According to IRS, an electronic submission process is expected to provide better access to the program and reduce the burden associated with making a written report or referral. In November 2016, the cross-functional team requested information technology resources for fiscal year 2019 to develop an online system which could potentially replace four separate referral forms, filter out incomplete referrals, and electronically route referrals for further IRS action. IRS assessed options for consolidating all forms for the various referral programs and determined that consolidating them to a single form was not feasible due to the technical nature and complexity of the various referral types. As of March 2017, the cross-functional team has worked with IRS On Line Services to develop an online application prototype and is also considering the cost-effectiveness of a commercial off-the-shelf product. According to the IRS, the online application will make it easier for the public to report possible tax violations. Also, the online system will improve efficiency in coordination and provide reports that will be incorporated into the quarterly coordination meetings, to achieve a broader collaborative mechanism across the multiple referral programs. IRS has said it will consider further consolidating the referral programs once the online application is in place.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) has internal controls for processing information referrals by establishing, documenting, and implementing procedures for maintaining and communicating the information referral screening and routing guidelines to the Image Control Team (ICT) and IRS units receiving information referrals as well as procedures for ICT screening and routing operations.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of January 2017, IRS has taken some action on this recommendation. IRS told us it established a cross-functional team in February 2016 to conduct a comprehensive review of IRS's referral programs, including the information referral process. IRS completed its review and plan for the organizational structure in December 2016. Once IRS approves the organizational structure, IRS will document new and updated screening and routing procedures in the Internal Revenue Manual as well as guidance for the Image Control Team and other IRS units receiving information referrals. IRS plans to implement this recommendation by September 2017.
    Director: Jessica Lucas-Judy
    Phone: (202) 512-9110

    7 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should clearly define and document: (1) key terms such as "fairness"; and (2) W&I program level objectives, performance measures, and indicators for audit selection to evaluate whether the audit selection process is meeting its mission of applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS told us its definitions of fairness were documented in a policy statement and reflected in the IRS Taxpayer Bill of Rights. IRS said it agrees with the value of incorporating these definitions into its guidance for examiners and that it was taking appropriate action to do so. In addition, IRS said guiding principles for ensuring fairness in tax return examinations had been communicated from the Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement to all Service and Enforcement employees. However, IRS did not provide documentation of this communication. IRS said it will use its definition as the basis of guidance to be incorporated into the Internal Revenue Manual to ensure the audit process supports IRS's mission of applying the tax law with integrity and fairness. IRS did not indicate how it would develop program-level objectives for W&I, as we recommended. Additionally, IRS said many of its existing performance measures provide key indicators and insights as to program performance with respect to fairness, such as the rate of examinations resulting in changes proposed to the reported tax, cycle time for the examination, and yield from the examination. However, as we noted in our December 2015 report, these performance measures focus on audit results rather than audit selection and W&I has not created indicators to evaluate what no-change rate is good or bad, or what rate would indicate fair selections. We will continue to monitor IRS's actions, including reviewing any supporting documentation the agency provides, to determine whether its actions address our recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should clearly communicate these terms, objectives, measures, and indicators to all staff involved in the selection of returns for audit.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS said it was writing expectations about the definition of fairness that would be communicated at the beginning of each annual audit selection planning meeting. IRS told us it plans to implement this in July 2017.
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should incorporate the new objective(s) into W&I risk assessments done for audit selection processes.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS said it would follow the risk process to officially report any risks associated with the outlined expectations identified during the review of the program level objectives, performance measures and indicators for audit selection. This recommendation will remain open until W&I develops program-level objectives--which would be related to its definition of fairness--and incorporates them into risk assessments for the audit selection process. IRS indicated it would implement our recommendation by October 2017.
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should ensure that internal control responsibilities are communicated and documented for all employees, including non-managers, tasked with revising or applying W&I audit selection criteria for potential audits.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS said that by July 2017, internal control information would be provided in the expectation document provided to each member of the annual audit selection planning meeting and that receipt would be documented.
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop and implement procedures to ensure that all criteria or methods used in programs to select returns for audit are consistently documented and approved.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS said procedures are in place to document and approve the criteria and methods used in the return selection program. It said it would review these procedures to ensure all criteria or methods used are consistently documented and approved by August 2017.
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop and document a clear means for IRS staff members to promptly elevate to top management possible internal control issues related to audit selection in a timely manner.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS said it would expand existing feedback mechanisms to specifically cover the audit selection process by July 2017. It is unclear what specific actions IRS plans to take to address the issues we reported in December 2015. For example, we found that the Internal Revenue Manual does not specify how non-managers should report a significant deficiency (such as a problem in the design or operation of an internal control) to the next level of management or that it should be reported in a timely manner. In addition, we reported that the form that W&I staff would use to report such deficiencies in the automated filters used for return selection does not include space for reporting internal control deficiencies that do not have a proposed solution. The form also states that the reason for modification should be self-explanatory, which may not appropriately highlight the deficiency the modification seeks to address.
    Recommendation: To help ensure W&I meets its mission and selects audits fairly and with integrity, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop, document, and implement additional monitoring procedures to ensure audit selection controls and corrective actions are implemented in a timely manner.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: In April 2017, IRS said it has modified Form 14747, Workload Identification Change Request Modification Approval, to document the request and approval for all changes to workload selection tools. Additionally, IRS said it now requires staff to follow the Unified Work Request process to request revisions/additions to certain audit selection rules. The work requests are documented in a database and require different levels of executive review and approval. IRS said the process has strict time frames outlining required submission dates to be followed for changes for the upcoming filing season. IRS also is developing a new section of the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) to document all of the workload selection methods and to change and outline required approval processes used to revise/add selection criteria for correspondence audits -- including the Form 14747 procedures. IRS did not provide a timeframe when this new IRM section would be published.
    Director: James R. McTigue, Jr.
    Phone: (202) 512-9110

    7 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help ensure SB/SE's audit selection program meets its mission and selects returns fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should clearly define and document the key term "fairness" for return selection activities.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to incorporate a definition of fairness into the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM), which serves as a single point of reference for guidance to IRS examiners. In February 2016, the Deputy Commissioner of Services and Enforcement (S&E) reiterated IRS's definition of fairness in the examination process to S&E employees. In January 2017, IRS issued interim guidance on fairness in examination case selection. IRS officials said that this guidance is considered "final" until the IRM is updated, no later than January 2019. In February 2017, IRS issued an article on its IRWeb and a message from the Deputy Commissioner S&E on defining fairness in the exam process. We are awaiting resolution of how this definition will be used in three other recommendations on communicating examples as well as developing both a related objective and measure.
    Recommendation: To help ensure SB/SE's audit selection program meets its mission and selects returns fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should clearly communicate examples of fair selections to staff to better assure consistent understanding.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to communicate examples of fairness to managers and examiners involved in selecting tax returns for examination. In March 2017, the Director of IRS Small Business/Self Employed (SB/SE) Examination-Headquarters issued a memo to SB/SE examination directors that included examples illustrating the fairness definition in return selection. The examples were to be shared with directors, management, and examiners involved in return selection. To close this recommendation, we are waiting for resolution of how the fairness definition will be implemented through related recommendations on developing program objectives and measures assessing fairness in return selection.
    Recommendation: To help ensure SB/SE's audit selection program meets its mission and selects returns fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop, document, and implement program-level objective(s) to evaluate whether the return selection process is meeting its mission of applying the tax law with integrity and fairness to all.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to review its current objectives for the SB/SE examination program and found that an additional program-level objective to evaluate fairness in the return selection was necessary. The new objective is "Ensure examinations are initiated based on indicators of noncomplicance. In addition, ensure a review of the decisions to survey a return (i.e., not initiate an examination) are based on upon factors outlined in the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) and approved by an appropriate level of management." In March 2017, IRS issued interim guidance communicating the new objective, which was sent to Examination Directors. The guidance and objective were also posted on the IRweb, which is available to all IRS employees. IRS officials said that the interim guidance is considered final until it can be incorporated into the IRM, which should be done within 2 years of when the interim guidance is issued. We are awaiting IRS's response to a related recommendation on developing a measure for this selection objective before deciding to close this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that SB/SE's audit selection objective(s) on fairness are used and met, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop, document, and implement related performance measures that would allow SB/SE to determine how well the selection of returns for audit meets the new objective(s).

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to develop, document, and implement additional performance measures if new objectives related to fair return selection were implemented. In March 2017, IRS developed a new objective on fair return selection. In April 2017, IRS officials said that they were working on performance measures related to the new objective on fair return selection. They plan to meet with GAO in 1-2 months to obtain our feedback on the measures.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that SB/SE's audit selection objective(s) on fairness are used and met, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should incorporate the new objective(s) for fair return selection into the SB/SE risk management system to help identify and analyze potential risks to fair selections.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to consider any new objectives related to fair return selection within SB/SE's current risk management process framework. In March and April 2017, SB/SE developed a tool (RAFT) to include the fair selection objective (and related activities) into its risk register, which is monitored quarterly. IRS provided documentation from the Exam Risk Council meeting that they have discussed and assessed these risks. IRS is still working on documentation to show they are addressing our recommendations and the associated risks. IRS officials said the documentation is due in August 2017.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop and implement consistent documentation requirements to clarify the reasons for selecting a return for audit and who reviewed and approved the selection decision.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to evaluate the need to improve its documentation of return selection decisions and the review and approval process. In March 2017, various IRS functions completed templates showing the current status of return selection documentation requirements. As a result, they found that they could improve the consistency and clarity in documentation, approval and review requirements across workstreams by clearly defining procedures and ensuring they are formally documented in the IRM. The Director of Exam Case Selection issued a memo directing that documentation requirements be made consistent in the IRM. IRS officials said that revised documentation requirements are due in August 2017, with IRM incorporation at a later date.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop, document, and implement monitoring procedures to ensure that decisions made and coding used to select returns for audit are appropriate.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed to review its current procedures for monitoring return selection decisions and coding used to select returns. In April 2017, IRS officials provided documentation showing they had reviewed campus examination selection dollar thresholds and campus source code definitions. They found that improvements could be made in clarifying source code definitions and reviewing dollar thresholds used to categorize and select, respectively, returns for examination. IRS has issued an IRM procedural update to implement these changes. During our meeting with IRS, we clarified that our recommendation covered monitoring selection decisions more broadly, which IRS acknowledged. Officials said that additional documentation on monitoring selection decisions will be due by August 2017.
    Director: Mctigue Jr, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-7968

    3 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: Congress should consider altering the TEFRA audit procedures to require partnerships to designate a qualified Tax Matters Partner (TMP) and, if that TMP is an entity, to also identify a representative who is an individual and for partnerships to keep the designation up to date.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: In October 2015, H.R. 1314 was amended to include the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015, which included provisions that would repeal the TEFRA audit procedures and put in place new audit procedures for partnerships with more than 100 partners. This legislation was signed into law in November 2015. According to the legislation, the new audit procedures would require partnerships to designate a qualified representative for the partnership audit. However, the legislation did not require audited partnerships to identify a representative who is an individual nor do they require that audited partnerships keep the designation up to date as suggested in GAO's report. The legislation does give IRS the authority to develop regulations about how the partnership representative should be designated by the partnership and such regulations may address the items in GAO's report. Currently regulations are under development at IRS. The legislation specifies that the new partnership audit procedures apply to partnership returns filed for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should track the results of large partnerships audits: (a) define a large partnership based on asset size and number of partners; (b) revise the activity codes to align with the large partnership definition; and (c) separately account for field audits and campus audits.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: No executive action taken. IRS said that it plans to address parts of GAO's September 2014 recommendation about tracking the audit results on large partnerships but has not yet done so. In November 2014, IRS said that it plans to define large partnerships using asset size and the number of partners and to find an alternative method to account for field and campus large partnership cases using existing capabilities, but that revising IRS's activity codes to enable it to track large partnership audits would be dependent on future funding. In March 2017, IRS told GAO that it would need until September 2017 to address this recommendation as IRS continues to monitor efforts to implement the Bipartisan Budget Act (BBA). Section 1101 of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (Public law 114-74), which was enacted in November 2015, includes provisions that repeal TEFRA audit procedures and put in place audit procedures that would require partnerships with more than 100 partners to pay audit adjustments at the partnership level, among other changes. IRS explained that these changes significantly alter the procedural and administrative components of partnerships. IRS said it would need this additional time to analyze options and determine the most appropriate steps for effectively tracking the results of large partnership audits. Without changes to tracking partnership audit results, IRS cannot conduct analysis to identify ways to better plan and use IRS resources in auditing large partnerships as well as analyze whether large partnerships present a high noncompliance risk.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should analyze the audit results by these activity codes and types of audits to identify opportunities to better plan and use IRS resources in auditing large partnerships.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of October 2016, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) said that based on completion of GAO's recommendations on tracking results and after sufficient large partnership audit results have been obtained, it still plans to conduct a study to analyze these results and recommend any ways in which resource use can be improved. IRS still expects to complete this analysis by September 2018.
    Director: Mctigue Jr, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-7968

    8 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: If IRS delays are continuing, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should further revise the notices to provide more realistic response times based on the data and take other appropriate actions to ensure efficient use of IRS tax examiner resources. For example, IRS could choose to provide taxpayers who call IRS with a recorded message notifying them of delays in IRS responding and when to expected an IRS response.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS revised the automated telephone message that taxpayers hear when they call but has not revised its notices. The new message provides taxpayers information on the correspondence audit workload and time frames and asks that they allow a certain number of days before calling to check on the status of their audit. However, IRS has yet to further revise notices to provide more realistic time frames. In July 2016, IRS officials said they were in the process of revising the notices in order to allow individual correspondence audit offices to enter a customized response date based on their respective inventory levels at the time notices are sent. As of March 2017, IRS officials said additional programming changes will delay implementation until July 2017.
    Recommendation: To clarify the desired results of the correspondence audit program and its linkages to IRS-wide activities, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should establish formal program objectives.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: IRS correspondence audit program officials planned a working group to develop formal program objectives. In November 2016, IRS officials provided documents intended to define the program objectives, but the objectives were unclear. As of March 2017, officials said they had no planned date by which to clearly document the objectives, but said they expect to describe them in program guidance changes anticipated in the next 12 to 18 months.
    Recommendation: To clarify the desired results of the correspondence audit program and its linkages to IRS-wide activities, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should ensure that the program measures reflect those objectives.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS officials said that, among other actions, they plan to review and update program documentation and guidance as warranted to ensure a clear link between correspondence audit program objectives and related measures. IRS officials provided documentation in August 2016, but program measures could not be clearly linked to objectives because the objectives were not clear. As of March 2017, officials had no planned date by which to clearly document the program objectives and their links with program measures.
    Recommendation: To clarify the desired results of the correspondence audit program and its linkages to IRS-wide activities, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should clearly link those measures with strategic IRS-wide goals on ensuring compliance in a cost-effective way while minimizing taxpayer burden.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS officials said that, among other actions, they plan to review and update program documentation and guidance as warranted to ensure that program measures clearly link to IRS strategic goals. IRS officials provided documentation in August 2016, but measures for the program could not be clearly linked to either the program objectives or IRS goals because the objectives were not clear. As of March 2017, officials had no planned date by which to clearly document how the program measures link to the objectives and IRS strategic goals.
    Recommendation: To better inform decisions being made about the correspondence audit program, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should document how the decisions are to be made using the performance information (including criteria and tolerances used).

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS officials agreed with the recommendation and said they would thoroughly document the program plan development process but did not refer to documenting how program decisions are to be made using performance information. In April 2016, officials provided documents describing current correspondence audit planning processes, but the documents lacked specifics on the decisions and performance information, criteria, and tolerances used. IRS officials said they would provide documentation on these specific details in Spring 2017.
    Recommendation: To better inform decisions being made about the correspondence audit program, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should track and use other program data that have not been used to provide more complete performance information. Examples of data that could be tracked and used include how much of the recommended tax amounts is collected over time; taxpayer burden and experience such as how often audits are resolved in one contact, how often taxpayers correspond or call, and how long taxpayers wait for IRS to respond to their documents and for the audit to close; and costs beyond the direct audit time, such as the costs to answer taxpayer calls per audit, assess the recommended tax, and collect those tax assessments.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS officials said they would evaluate the methodology used in several existing studies to determine the most productive use of collectability data and evaluate the feasibility of collecting and using additional data. In April 2016, officials provided information on researching and testing of a new audit planning method during fiscal year 2016, using costs and collection results data. In November 2016, IRS officials said they had implemented the planning method to consider collection results for fiscal year 2017 but had not yet provided supporting documentation on how the method has used the collection results or on the status of efforts to use other program data, such as whether or when IRS will use performance information on costs and taxpayer burden related to audits. IRS officials said they will provide the documentation in Spring 2017.
    Recommendation: To better ensure an effective investment of resources in the CEAP efforts, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should clearly document the intended benefits of ongoing efforts to address identified problems, and the process for measuring and tracking actual benefits.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS Correspondence audit program officials said they would document the expected benefits of ongoing changes by June 2016. We have since asked IRS officials to provide related documents. As of April 2017, we are awaiting documents.
    Recommendation: To better ensure an effective investment of resources in the CEAP efforts, the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service should develop a plan and timeline for implementing the CEAP contractor's recommendations on possible ways to improve the (a) selection of correspondence audit workload and (b) allocation of resources between providing telephone assistance and reviewing taxpayer correspondence to resolve audits or develop justifications for not implementing the recommendations.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS officials agreed with the recommendation and said they would continue to pursue efforts with research functions to further improve workload selection and maximize resource usage. However, they did not refer to any plan or timeline for implementing contractor recommendations to improve the selection of correspondence audit workload and allocation of examiner resources, or develop justifications for not implementing those recommendations. In March 2017, officials confirmed that IRS does not intend to implement the contractor's recommendations or to evaluate them, for example, by developing justifications for not implementing them.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-9110

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To ensure that IRS is meeting the stated goals of CAP, the Principal Deputy Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Deputy Commissioner for Services and Enforcement should track savings from Compliance Maintenance and CAP overall and develop a plan for reinvesting any savings.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, IRS had taken some steps to implement this recommendation, but is not fully tracking the amount of dollar savings from using CAP nor developing a plan to reinvest any savings, as GAO recommended in August 2013. IRS is tracking savings by analyzing and comparing the workload inventory of account coordinators who handle CAP cases against team coordinators who handle non-CAP cases. This caseload comparison is a part of IRS's annual CAP evaluation and was included in its June 2014 CAP evaluation plan. Based on GAO's review of the evaluation plan and results, IRS's caseload comparison did not show the amount of dollar savings from CAP. The comparison for tax years 2010 through 2012 showed that account coordinators handling CAP cases exclusively or in conjunction with non-CAP cases have a larger caseload than team coordinators handling non-CAP cases. In addition, IRS has not developed a plan for reinvesting any savings, as GAO recommended in August 2013. Such a plan could help IRS increase audit coverage. IRS stated that it cannot measure the CAP's impact on audit coverage because audit coverage is based on staffing and compliance priorities. Also, IRS said that while quantifying monetary savings would be difficult, it has reinvested its savings by expanding account coordinators' caseloads as shown in the average caseload of CAP and non-CAP cases worked. However, without a plan for tracking savings and using them to increase audit coverage, IRS cannot be assured that the savings are effectively invested in either CAP or non-CAP taxpayers with a high compliance risk. IRS is evaluating the CAP program to determine how it fits with IRS's future vision for examinations. It has no timetable for completing this evaluation. IRS did not accept new CAP applications for 2016, deciding that CAP would be limited to taxpayers who are in the program for 2017.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202)512-5594

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To increase the effectiveness of IRS's examinations individual tax returns, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should transcribe data from paper-filed Form 1040 Schedules C and E that are not currently transcribed and make that data available to SB/SE examiners for classification. If IRS has evidence that the costs related to transcribing all such data on Schedules C and E are prohibitive, IRS could do one or both of the following actions: (1) transcribe less data by transcribing only the missing data for selected line items, such as certain, large expense line items, or (2) develop a budget proposal to fund an initiative for transcribing Schedule C and E.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, IRS had completed its study on whether to transcribe more data from paper-filed returns by comparing the benefits to classifying tax returns for audit from doing this transcription. They said the benefits to be derived from additional transcription are not significant and would not outweigh the added cost. However, IRS has not provided specific information about the costs and benefits from transcribing information from Schedules C and E that we mentioned in our recommendation. Having more data transcribed and electronically available from these areas likely will improve the classification of audits as well as the quality of the audits, according to examiners we spoke with for the report.
    Director: Clark, Cheryl E
    Phone: (202)512-9377

    3 open recommendations
    Recommendation: The Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue should direct the appropriate IRS officials to perform a risk assessment to determine the appropriate level of Integrated Data Retrieval System (IDRS) access that should be granted to employee groups that handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive taxpayer information as part of their job responsibilities.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: According to IRS, a risk assessment was performed to determine the appropriate level of IDRS access that should be granted to employee groups that handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive taxpayer information as part of their job responsibilities. However, during our fiscal year 2016 audit, we identified a group of employees at an SCC who handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive taxpayer information and can make adjustments to taxpayer accounts. Based on the information obtained, it is unclear whether the risks associated with these employees were considered in a risk assessment. We will continue to evaluate IRS's actions to address this recommendation during our fiscal year 2017 audit.
    Recommendation: The Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue should direct the appropriate IRS officials to, based on the results of the risk assessment, update the Internal Revenue Manual (IRM) accordingly to specify the appropriate level of IDRS access that should be allowed for (1) remittance perfection technicians and (2) all other employee groups with IDRS access that handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive information as part of their job responsibilities.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As a result of its risk assessment efforts thus far, IRS updated the IRM to restrict the use of certain IDRS command codes for remittance perfection technicians. In addition, in May 2016, IRS reassessed the risks at its TACs, including the specific risks and mitigating factors associated with allowing TAC employees to process taxpayer remittances and to adjust taxpayer accounts. However, IRS did not update the IRM to reflect the conclusions from the risk assessment related to TAC employees. Further, during our fiscal year 2016 audit, we identified a group of employees at an SCC who handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive taxpayer information and can make adjustments to taxpayer accounts. Based on the information obtained, it is unclear whether the risks associated with these employees were considered in a risk assessment. We will continue to evaluate IRS's actions to address this recommendation during our fiscal year 2017 audit.
    Recommendation: The Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue should direct the appropriate IRS officials to establish procedures to implement the updated IRM, including required steps to follow to prevent (1) remittance perfection technicians and (2) all other employee groups that handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive information as part of their job responsibilities from gaining access to command codes not required as part of their designated job duties.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As a result of its risk assessment efforts thus far, IRS updated the IRM to include procedures to restrict the use of certain IDRS command codes for remittance perfection technicians. However, the IRM has not been updated based on the results of the risk assessment related to TAC employees and, if applicable, other employees who have access to sensitive command codes and handle hard-copy taxpayer receipts and related sensitive information as part of their job duties. We will continue to evaluate IRS's actions to address this recommendation during our fiscal year 2017 audit.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202)512-5594

    2 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To understand the scope of the business nonfiler population, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should estimate the magnitude of business nonfiling among businesses registered with IRS, using data from its operational files to select cases for further investigation. Based on the results of this work IRS should develop a tax gap estimate for the impact of business nonfiling insofar as doing so is cost-effective.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of August 2017, IRS said it did not plan to develop a partial estimate of the business nonfiler rate, as we recommended in August 2010. IRS reported that funding would likely be unavailable for it to do so using operational data. According to IRS, its existing operational data on business nonfilers are sufficient. However, even a partial estimate could give IRS additional information that would be useful in its strategic planning and help it determine what priority it should place on this type of noncompliance.
    Recommendation: To monitor the performance of business nonfiler activities, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should set a deadline for developing data that can be used to measure the performance of the BMF CCNIP and its business nonfiler compliance activities overall.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS has determined that it does not have the necessary data that could be used to measure its business nonfiler efforts across the agency and that it therefore cannot set a deadline for developing such data, as GAO recommended in August 2010. According to IRS, developing such data would be prohibitively costly. Rather, as of August 2017, IRS plans to continue to use the data at the operating division level. Without going through the process of developing performance data, IRS is unable to know what data would aid in monitoring and evaluating its business nonfiler efforts. Absent cross-agency performance data, IRS is unable to fully understand the outcomes of its business nonfiler efforts.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202)512-5594

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: Congress may wish to consider providing IRS with math error authority (MEA) to use prior years' tax return information to automatically verify taxpayers' compliance with the limit on the number of years the Hope credit can be claimed.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of August 3, 2017, Congress has not provided IRS with math error authority (MEA) to use prior years' tax return information to automatically verify taxpayers' compliance with the limit on the number of years the Hope Scholarship Credit, now known as the American Opportunity Tax Credit (AOTC) can be claimed. The AOTC can be claimed by taxpayers for qualified tuition and related expenses for 4 years of postsecondary education. Under the Protecting Americans From Tax Hikes Act of 2015, IRS was granted MEA to disallow a claim for the AOTC if the taxpayer is not permitted to claim the credit due to prior fraudulent or reckless claims, or if the taxpayer omitted information relating to prior improper claims of the credit. IRS does not have authority to automatically deny an AOTC even if the taxpayer claims the credit for more than the 4 allowable years. GAO has in the past provided technical assistance to the House Solutions Caucus in drafting legislative language for a bill on extending MEA to use prior years' returns for verifying compliance with limits on the credit. In addition, the Administration has for many years included a revenue proposal in Treasury's Green Book to provide IRS with "correctable error authority" where the (1) information provided by the taxpayer does not match the information contained in government databases, (2) taxpayer has exceeded the lifetime limit for claiming the credit or deduction, or (3) taxpayer failed to include proper documentation with his or her return. If this revenue proposal was enacted, IRS would have the authority to deny claims for the AOTC if the taxpayer has already received the credit for 4 years.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202)512-5594

    3 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To simplify the burden that the corporate exemption places on payers to distinguish payees' business status and also provide greater information reporting, Congress may wish to consider requiring payers to report payments to corporations on the form 1099 MISC, as we previously suggested and as proposed in the Bush Administration's budget.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: No legislative action has been identified to require payers engaged in a trade or business to report on payments to corporations for services, thereby reducing these payers' burden to determine which payments require reporting. On March 23, 2010, Congress enacted section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-148), which expanded information reporting to include payments made to corporations, consistent with GAO's January 2009 matter for congressional consideration. The provision also required payers to report payments for property and gross proceeds. The provision was to be effective for payments after December 31, 2011, requiring payers to report beginning in January 2013 on payments to corporations made in 2012 for property or services. However, Congress repealed the provision on April 14, 2011, by section 2 of the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-9).
    Recommendation: To gauge the extent of 1099-MISC payer noncompliance and its contribution to the tax gap, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should, as part of future research studies, develop an estimate of 1099-MISC payer noncompliance.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: According to IRS, developing such an estimate requires a multi-pronged approach and a large amount of coordinated effort. One prong is to determine the extent of filing compliance among employers. A second prong would determine the extent to which 1099-MISC payers properly report their payments. Starting with the Tax Year 2001 individual income tax reporting compliance study, the National Research Program (NRP) office has been collecting some data related to Form 1099-MISC compliance, from both the payer and payee perspectives. With the ongoing annual individual income tax reporting compliance studies, the IRS will gather more data on this issue. However, by themselves, these efforts will not provide a comprehensive picture of the scope of potential Form 1099-MISC non-compliance. Additional data will be generated by the NRP reporting compliance study for employment tax. As part of the NRP employment tax research, IRS examiners were to review taxpayers' Form 1099 filing compliance. Data collected from these studies should shed some light on whether employers are appropriately reporting required payments on Form 1099-MISC. As of July 2017, IRS had completed portions of its analysis of the NRP employment tax sample results and was working to resolve data issues. IRS estimates its analysis of the extent of Form 1099-MISC payer noncompliance will be complete by December 2017. We will continue to monitor IRS's progress.
    Recommendation: To gauge the extent of 1099-MISC payer noncompliance and its contribution to the tax gap, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should, as part of future research studies, determine the nature and characteristics of those payers that do not comply with 1099-MISC reporting requirements so that this information can be factored into an IRS-wide strategy for increasing 1099-MISC payer compliance.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS researchers are collecting data on 1099-MISC reporting as part of its National Research Program (NRP) study on employment taxes, a program that involves examinations of a sample of tax returns expected to culminate in 2015. The examinations include tax years 2008 through 2010. As part of the NRP employment tax research, IRS examiners were to review taxpayers' Form 1099 filing compliance. Collecting data on this issue will enable IRS to study the nature and characteristics of payers that do not comply with 1099-MISC reporting requirements. As of July 2017, IRS had completed portions of its analysis of the NRP employment tax sample results and was working to resolve data issues. IRS estimates its 1099-MISC payer reporting compliance analysis will be completed in December 2017.We will continue to monitor IRS's progress.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-5594

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: Given the potential for improving compliance now and in the future, Congress may wish to provide IRS with the authority to use math error checks to identify and correct returns with ineligible (1) IRA "catch-up" contributions, and (2) contributions to traditional IRAs from taxpayers over age 70-1/2.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of April 2017, the Congress has not provided IRS with the math error authority to ensure that taxpayers comply with certain catch-up and contributions requirements.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202)512-3000

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To provide clarity for which taxpayers with rental real estate activity must report expense payments on information returns and to provide greater information reporting, Congress may wish to consider amending the Internal Revenue Code to make all taxpayers with rental real estate activity subject to the same information reporting requirements as other taxpayers operating a trade or business.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, no legislation had been identified to make owners of rental real estate subject to the same payment reporting requirements regardless of whether they engaged in a trade or business under current law. In the 112th Congress, Congress enacted the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-240), which contained a provision that required, in general, persons receiving rental income from real estate to be considered engaged in a trade or business and therefore subject to the reporting requirements of section 6041 of the Internal Revenue Code, which was consistent with GAO's August 2008 matter for congressional consideration. However, Congress repealed the provision on April 14, 2011, by section 3 of the Comprehensive 1099 Taxpayer Protection and Repayment of Exchange Subsidy Overpayments Act of 2011 (Public Law 112-9).
    Director: Clark, Cheryl E
    Phone: (202) 512-3000

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To address other issues that may exist in IRS's master files that affect penalty calculations, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should direct appropriate IRS officials to, in instances where programs are not functioning in accordance with the intent of the IRM, take appropriate action to correct the programs so that they function in accordance with the IRM.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: According to IRS, it had substantially completed its corrective actions to address 19 penalty programming issues it had identified from its internal assessment of penalty computation programs. However, as of September 30, 2016, IRS had not provided us with supporting documentation to validate that it completed the corrective actions. We will continue to evaluate IRS's actions to address this recommendation during our fiscal year 2017 financial statement audit.
    Director: White, James R
    Phone: (202)512-5594

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: The Secretary of the Treasury should ensure that the tax gap strategy includes (1) a segment on improving sole proprietor compliance that is coordinated with broader tax gap reduction efforts and (2) specific proposals, such as the options we identified, that constitute an integrated package.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of August 2017, Treasury has taken no action to address this recommendation and has not provided GAO with plans to do so. Treasury's tax gap strategy does not cover sole proprietor compliance in detail while coordinating it with broader tax gap reduction efforts as GAO recommended in July 2007. In March 2016, Treasury officials reported to GAO that they have implemented or proposed several actions to address the tax gap among sole proprietors, such as requiring reporting on payment card payments and improved audit selection procedures for sole proprietors. However, GAO's July 2007 report noted there are many trade offs involved in various options for improving sole proprietor compliance. GAO recommended that Treasury's strategy for reducing the tax gap include a segment on sole proprietor compliance that is coordinated with broader tax gap reduction efforts.
    Director:
    Phone:

    2 open recommendations
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should match independent contractors' information returns with their tax returns to more systematically identify employers who are misclassifying employees as independent contractors and to better target audit resources for doing employment tax examinations.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: Call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
    Recommendation: Section 630 of the Revenue Act of 1978 restricts IRS' authority to ensure that current and future classifications will be correct. In view of the equity issues and tax revenues involved, Congress may wish to consider repealing this restriction against requiring employers to prospectively reclassify employees who have been misclassified as independent contractors.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: Call 202/512-6100 for additional information.