Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "S corporations"

    2 publications with a total of 5 open recommendations including 2 priority recommendations
    Director: Mctigue Jr, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-7968

    4 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: Congress should consider expanding the mandate for partnerships and corporations to electronically file their tax returns to cover a greater share of filed returns.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: No legislation enacted as of March 2017. Current law requires entities that file more than 250 returns during a year or partnerships with more than 100 partners to file electronically. A bill has been introduced in Congress, S. 3178, which would gradually lower the threshold to 20 returns. Requiring greater digitization of tax return information, as GAO suggested in May 2014, would help the Internal Revenue Service identify which partnership and S corporation tax returns would be most productive to examine. Improving IRS's selection of partnership and S corporation returns to examine would also benefit compliant taxpayers whose returns may otherwise be selected for examination. Further, expanded e-filing would reduce IRS's tax return processing costs.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop and implement a strategy to better estimate (1) the extent and nature of partnership misreporting, and (2) the effectiveness of partnership examinations in detecting this misreporting.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of April 2017, IRS had initiated the Partnership Research Study (PRS). PRS is a smaller scale version of IRS's originally planed National Research Program (NRP) study for partnerships. IRS decided to conduct the smaller scale study because of resource constraints (the NRP study would have required IRS to audit 10,000 partnership tax returns, which is more than all the partnership returns that IRS normally audits in the course of a year; through PRS IRS plans to audit about 2,000 returns). PRS will be similar to an NRP study in that there are mandatory issues that will be audited, and stringent requirements for surveying (dismissing) examinations. IRS has started auditing 1,750 returns and will begin auditing 500 more returns starting in November. IRS is hopeful that PRS will allow it to determine (1) whether the differences in examination rates across different types of business entities are justified, and (2) whether an improved tool for selecting partnerships for examination, such as an updated partnership discriminant function, should be developed.
    Recommendation: The Commissioner of Internal Revenue should use the better information on noncompliance and program effectiveness to determine (1) whether the differences in examination rates across different types of business entities are justified, and (2) whether an improved tool for selecting partnerships for examination, such as an updated partnership discriminant function, should be developed.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of April 2017, IRS had initiated the Partnership Research Study (PRS). PRS is a smaller scale version of IRS's originally planed National Research Program (NRP) study for partnerships. IRS decided to conduct the smaller scale study because of resource constraints (the NRP study would have required IRS to audit 10,000 partnership tax returns, which is more than all the partnership returns that IRS normally audits in the course of a year; through PRS IRS plans to audit about 2,000 returns). PRS will be similar to an NRP study in that there are mandatory issues that will be audited, and stringent requirements for surveying (dismissing) examinations. IRS has started auditing 1,750 returns and will begin auditing 500 more returns starting in November. IRS is hopeful that PRS will allow it to determine (1) whether the differences in examination rates across different types of business entities are justified, and (2) whether an improved tool for selecting partnerships for examination, such as an updated partnership discriminant function, should be developed.
    Recommendation: While IRS works to improve the quality of its Schedule K-1 data, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should develop a plan for conducting testing or other analysis to determine whether the improved Schedule K-1 data, perhaps combined with other IRS information about businesses and taxpayers, could be used more effectively to ensure compliance with the reporting of flow-through income.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS stated that it understands the objective of this recommendation and, at such time that resources are available to enhance capabilities, it would consider the proposed methodology of advanced testing. However, based on current and anticipated budget constraints, it does not expect its plans to change in the near future.
    Director: Brostek, Michael
    Phone: (202)512-9039

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve compliance with shareholder basis rules, Congress may wish to require S corporations to calculate and report shareholder's stock and debt basis as completely as possible. S corporations would report the calculation on the Schedule K-1 and send it to shareholders as well as IRS. If Congress judges that stock purchase price information that is currently only available to shareholders should not be transmitted to the S corporation due to privacy concerns, an alternative is to require that S corporations report less complete basis calculations using information already available to the S corporation.

    Agency: Congress
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, Congress had not enacted legislation to require S corporations--a federal business type that provides certain tax benefits like passing income and losses to shareholders' individual returns-- to calculate and report shareholder's stock and debt basis as completely as possible and report the calculation to shareholders and IRS, as GAO suggested in December 2009.