Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "Price Inflation"

    2 publications with a total of 8 open recommendations including 1 priority recommendation
    Director: Mctigue Jr, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-9110

    5 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help ensure the IRS collection program meets its mission and selects cases fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should establish, document, and implement clear objectives for the collection program and enterprise-wide case categorization and routing processes, and define key terms, such as "fairness" and "risk."

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed with the recommendation. In March 2017, IRS provided a document intended define the objectives and "fairness," but it did not clearly define objectives for the collection program and enterprise-wide case categorization and routing processes, but instead identified division-level objectives and fiscal year 2017 collection strategies. The document also did not clearly define and communicate objectives--to include fairness--to staff in measurable terms that would be easily understood. Further, the objectives definitions were not were not clear and sufficient to support the design of internal control for related risks, the development of performance measures to determine whether objectives were achieved, and control assessments to assure case selections effectively support the collection program mission over time, including fairness. In August 2017, we shared this assessment with IRS and asked whether or when Collection plans to develop or provide additional documents.
    Recommendation: To help ensure the IRS collection program meets its mission and selects cases fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should build upon existing Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) guidance to help managers identify internal and external risks to collection program objectives, and better understand how long-standing risk processes integrate with new ERM approaches; incorporate this guidance into existing or future ERM or collection program risk assessment processes.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed with the recommendation and said it would continue to build upon existing risk management guidance by finalizing and making available training for managers, which would assist them in understanding their responsibilities for identifying internal and external risks to Collection program objectives. In November 2016, IRS provided documentation of risk management training for managers. However, since objectives for the collection program, enterprise-wide case categorization and routing processes, and fairness were not yet clearly defined, such guidance cannot be effectively incorporated into risk assessment processes to identify internal and external risks to collection program objectives. In August 2017, we shared this assessment with IRS and asked whether or when Collection plans to develop or provide additional documents.
    Recommendation: To help ensure the IRS collection program meets its mission and selects cases fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should clearly establish, document, and implement case categorization and routing procedures--such as those for IDS, high priority case selection, and any other important processes--to support collection program objectives and IRS goals.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed with the recommendation and said it would review its case prioritization and selection processes and implement and communicate clear guidance and documentation to appropriate IRS staff. In November 2016, IRS provided documents on collection processes, but the information was either technical or covered Automated Collection System (ACS) or Field Collection processes rather than enterprise-wide processes to support collection program objectives and IRS goals. More specifically, the documents did not provide corrected guidance on the role of the Inventory Delivery System and modeling in shelving or routing cases to either ACS or the Field, or provide guidance on how management is to select priority area cases. In August 2017, we shared this assessment with IRS and asked whether or when Collection plans to develop or provide additional documents.
    Recommendation: To help ensure the IRS collection program meets its mission and selects cases fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should establish, document, and implement procedures for the periodic evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of collection-wide case categorization, routing rules, and case selection processes.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS said agreed that continually improving its performance is important and said that Collection would review and, if needed, update its internal management documents. In July 2017, IRS provided documents that identified and established responsibilities for periodic, regular review procedures to potentially update dollar thresholds used in routing collection inventory for potential selection, including IDS and its decision rules to route cases to one collections function instead of another (i.e., the Automated Collection System versus Field Collection. In August 2017, we asked IRS when it plans to conduct the first such evaluations and requested that it provide documentation of results of those implemented evaluations when available.
    Recommendation: To help ensure the IRS collection program meets its mission and selects cases fairly, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should establish, document, and implement procedures for periodic updates of dollar thresholds for categorizing case selection, including those identified as "high risk."

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS agreed that continually improving its performance is important and said that Collection would review and, if needed, update its internal management documents. In July 2017, IRS provided documents that identified and established responsibilities for periodic, regular review procedures to potentially update dollar thresholds used in systems that use a dollar threshold to prioritize Collection cases. In August 2017, we asked IRS when it plans to conduct the first such evaluations and requested that it provide documentation of results of those implemented evaluations when available.
    Director: Mctigue Jr, James R
    Phone: (202) 512-7968

    3 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: To better ensure that IRS's limited enforcement resources are allocated in a manner that maximizes the revenue yield of the income tax, subject to other important objectives of tax administration, such as minimizing compliance costs and ensuring equitable treatment across different groups of taxpayers, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should review disparities in the ratios of direct revenue yield to costs across different enforcement programs and across different groups of cases within programs and determine whether this evidence provides a basis for adjusting IRS's allocation of enforcement resources each year. As part of this review, IRS should develop estimates of the marginal direct revenue and marginal direct cost within each enforcement program and each taxpayer group.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: IRS agrees in principle to using ratios of direct revenue yield-to-cost to adjust its enforcement resource allocation, as GAO recommended in December 2012; however, IRS officials plan to wait until it has developed such ratios at the marginal level (e.g., for the last cases worked within specific categories of exams) before they make such adjustments. GAO maintains that IRS has a basis to adjust its allocation of enforcement resources each year and could improve resource allocation immediately (while it is still working to develop the marginal ratios) by using average yield-to-cost ratios for each category. IRS has developed a methodology for estimating marginal ratios for limited subsets of cases within their correspondence examination program. IRS officials are working to apply this methodology to other cases within that program; however, they expect this effort will be complex and time consuming and officials did not have a timeline for full implementation as of March 2017. If IRS does not take into account some measure of revenue yield per dollar of cost when making allocation decisions, it will miss an opportunity to collect significant amounts of additional revenue.
    Recommendation: To better ensure that IRS's limited enforcement resources are allocated in a manner that maximizes the revenue yield of the income tax, subject to other important objectives of tax administration, such as minimizing compliance costs and ensuring equitable treatment across different groups of taxpayers, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should review disparities in the ratios of direct revenue yield to costs across different enforcement programs and across different groups of cases within programs and determine whether this evidence provides a basis for adjusting IRS's allocation of enforcement resources each year. As part of this review, IRS should compile data on the amount of time that specific grades of examiners and downstream employees spend on specific categories of exams that can be identified in ERIS.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS has developed a methodology to estimate for each closed correspondence audit the total cost to IRS to identify, assess, and collect whatever direct revenue is collected from that audit. These estimated take into account the actual time applied in Examination and Appeals, as well as the job series and grades of the Exam and Appeals employees who handled each return. Collections cost do not vary significantly across the population of correspondence audits, so an average cost factor is used for that portion of the costs. IRS anticipates that expanding this estimation effort to other enforcement programs, such as field examination will require a much larger effort. As of December 2015, officials did not yet have a timeline for full implementation. If IRS does not take into account some measure of revenue yield per dollar of cost when making allocation decisions, it will miss an opportunity to collect significant amounts of additional revenue.
    Recommendation: To better ensure that IRS's limited enforcement resources are allocated in a manner that maximizes the revenue yield of the income tax, subject to other important objectives of tax administration, such as minimizing compliance costs and ensuring equitable treatment across different groups of taxpayers, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue should review disparities in the ratios of direct revenue yield to costs across different enforcement programs and across different groups of cases within programs and determine whether this evidence provides a basis for adjusting IRS's allocation of enforcement resources each year.As part of this review, IRS should explore the potential of estimating the marginal influence of enforcement activity on voluntary compliance, potentially taking advantage of new NRP data.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: IRS has not yet found a way to use NRP data or other data sources to estimate the indirect effects of audits. While they continue to explore alternative ways to estimate these effects, they expect to continue to account for these effects subjectively as they develop their enforcement resource allocation plans. As of December 2015, officials did not yet have a timeline for full implementation. If IRS does not take into account some measure of revenue yield per dollar of cost when making allocation decisions, it will miss an opportunity to collect significant amounts of additional revenue.