Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "International security"

    8 publications with a total of 23 open recommendations including 5 priority recommendations
    Director: Khan, Asif A
    Phone: (202) 512-9869

    5 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to assure the effectiveness of the UCFR process as a compensating control for confirming the accuracy of its military pay, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to revise AR 37-104-4, Military Pay and Allowances Policy, to establish a requirement for periodic monitoring of the effectiveness of unit commander UCFR reviews.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, DOD and Army officials told us that the Army and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) performed an analysis of the effectiveness of the Unit Commander Finance Report (UCFR) in preventing payroll errors. The officials shared a February 21, 2013, Army memo on the results of the analysis, which indicated that while the UCFR was an effective tool as a snapshot of a Soldier's pay, it was not comprehensive enough to provide the level of detail needed to manage many pay entitlements. Additionally, analytical results showed that in most cases, having units certify and return UCFRs to the Finance Office did not result in corrective action in the month the condition requiring action first appeared on the report. The officials told us the Army intends to rely on existing primary controls over pay transactions and the implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A), which was targeted for implementation in 2017, to address the issues we reported rather than revising AR-37-104-4 to require certification of the UCFR and its return to the Finance Office. The Army concluded that if used properly, the UCFR could provide a secondary control for units to identify a limited number of pay discrepancies. The Army's Finance Command Director subsequently told us that because the analysis showed that the UCFR was not being used as an effective tool by unit commanders, the Army would continue to pursue methods to improve pay transaction timeliness through training and command awareness efforts, to include use of the UCFR, pending implementation of IPPS-A. For example, the Army expanded the list of entitlements that, similar to UCFRs, are sent to commands for review and increased the frequency of the command reviews. The Army also implemented a process for monitoring high-risk special pays that have an anniversary date, such as Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus, Basic Allowance for Housing, and Basic Allowance for Subsistence, and confirming that the certifications have not expired. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. We will continue to assess DOD's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to assure the effectiveness of the UCFR process as a compensating control for confirming the accuracy of its military pay, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to revise AR 37-104-4, Military Pay and Allowances Policy, to require unit commanders to review and submit documentation showing completion of all monthly UCFR reviews.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, DOD and Army officials told us that the Army and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) performed an analysis of the effectiveness of the Unit Commander Finance Report (UCFR) in preventing late transactions for updating pay. The results of an Army analysis showed that units certifying and returning UCFRs to the Finance Office did not increase timely corrective actions being taken to a soldier's pay. In a memo dated Feb. 21, 2013, the Army stated, "Creating a mandatory process of requiring Commanders to certify and return the UCFR (even when there are no errors) imposes additional administrative requirements and associated costs on the unit, the Finance Office and DFAS." The memo further stated that, based on the sample taken, most units are already certifying UCFRs and returning them to Finance -- with little impact on Soldiers' pay." Army officials told us that based on the Feb. 21, 2013, memo and subsequent follow up, the Army intended to rely on existing primary controls over pay transactions and the implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) targeted for August 2017 to address the issues we reported, rather than revise AR-37-104-4 to require certification of the UCFR and its return to the Finance Office. Army officials told us they would continue to pursue methods to improve pay transaction timeliness through training and command awareness efforts, to include use of the UCFR. The Army stated that the development and fielding of IPPS-A offers opportunities for reducing errors and manual inputs, while providing improved transaction timeliness and pay accuracy. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. We will continue to assess DOD's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to assure the effectiveness of the UCFR process as a compensating control for confirming the accuracy of its military pay, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to revise AR 37-104-4, Military Pay and Allowances Policy, to specify the time frame for submitting UCFRs, such as no later than the 10th of the month.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In a Feb. 21, 2013 memo, the Army stated that its regulations require units to take immediate action when an error is discovered during a review of an Unit Commander Finance Report (UCFR). According to the Army, specifying a timeframe for the review and submission of UCFRs, such as 10 days, would also require the development of additional controls and monitoring procedures and create exceptions/waivers for those units deployed or on training exercises. As a result, the Army intended to rely on existing primary controls over pay transactions and the targeted implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) in August 2017 to address the issues, rather than revise AR-37-104-4. With the slippage in implementation of IPPS-A integrated military personnel and pay functionality to April 2020, the Army needs to reconsider our recommendation along with reasonable timeline accommodations for deployed units. We will continue to assess the Army's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to provide a means for monitoring the overall accuracy of the Army's military payroll, the Secretary of Defense should direct the DOD Comptroller to require DFAS-IN to develop criteria and establish a comprehensive metric to capture and measure all types of pay errors affecting accuracy.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)-Indianapolis Director told us that DFAS conducted a gap analysis for two installations (Ft. Carson and Ft. Gordon). This analysis compared data on the effective date of pay impacting transactions (e.g., Basic Allowance for Housing, Foreign Language Proficiency Pay, etc.); the date transactions were entered into the pay system; the elapsed time in days from the effective date through each step of the process to the date pay was input to the military pay system. The Army's analysis concluded that most errors that occurred were due to units' late submissions of source documents. The Army's position is that the key metric for military pay accuracy is the timeliness of processing of pay impacting transactions. The Army intended to rely on the targeted August 2017 implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) to address pay transaction timeliness and address any other identified issues rather than require DFAS-Indianapolis to develop additional criteria and metrics within the current systems environment to measure all types of conditions affecting accuracy. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. We will continue to assess DOD's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to provide a means for monitoring the overall accuracy of the Army's military payroll, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Department of Defense (DOD) Comptroller to require DFAS-IN to establish an interim mechanism at DFAS-IN for identifying and analyzing the extent and causes of all types of military payroll errors processed by Defense Military Pay Offices (DMPOs), Army Finance Offices, Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active Component (DJMS-AC), and Case Management System (CMS) to address any systemic control weaknesses.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, DOD and Army officials stated that DFAS, as part of its pre-assertion audit readiness efforts for the Military Pay Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 16, Reporting on Controls at a Service Organization examination, has identified and validated many controls over the completeness, accuracy and validity of military pay. This included identifying gaps in internal controls and developing and implementing corrective action plans to mitigate any gaps. The Army subsequently engaged another independent public accounting firm to assess its audit readiness for the Statement of Budgetary Resources, including audit readiness for its military pay. In addition, the Army underwent an audit of its fiscal year 2015 General Fund Schedule of Budgetary Activity. Both audit engagements identified military pay issues requiring corrective action. Most recently, the audit of the Army's fiscal year 2016 Budgetary Schedule resulted in a disclaimer of opinion, in part, due to the Army's inability to produce a complete and accurate population of accession, separation, promotion/reduction, special pay, and leave populations for Active Duty, Reserve, and Guard soldiers. In January 2016, the Army auditor reported that "without the ability to produce complete populations, the risk exists that a soldier is improperly accessed, separated, promoted/reduced, awarded special pay, and/or had his or her leave account adjusted incorrectly. Further, the Army's ability to identify and correct any errors is significantly reduced, potentially misstating payroll obligations and outlays reported on the schedule." Army officials stated that it intends to rely on its current transaction timeliness metrics, pre-payment statistical sampling, Improper Payment Elimination and Reporting Act (IPERA) reporting, and eventually implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System - Army (IPPS-A) to address the issues regarding completeness, accuracy, and validity of military pay. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. Therefore, we believe that the Army needs to revisit our recommendation and establish an interim mechanism for identifying and analyzing the extent and causes of military payroll errors and take appropriate action to address any systemic control weaknesses. We will continue to assess the Army's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Director: Melito, Thomas
    Phone: (202) 512-9601

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To more effectively manage NDF's resources, increase program accountability, and ensure that NDF has the information necessary to improve program performance, the Secretary of State should direct ISN and NDF to periodically and systematically conduct and document program evaluations of NDF.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of State concurred with the recommendation. We contacted State in September 2016 to ascertain what it has done to address this recommendation. State responded on February 17, 2017. The Department responded by saying that to date, it has not conducted a formal evaluation of the Nonproliferation and Disarmament Fund as called for under the Department's evaluation policy.
    Director: King, Kathleen M
    Phone: (202) 512-7114

    1 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: In order to promote greater use of effective prepayment edits and better ensure proper payment, and to promote implementation of effective edits based on national policies, the CMS Administrator should develop written procedures to provide guidance to agency staff on all steps in the processes for developing and implementing edits based on national policies, including (1) time frames for taking corrective actions, (2) methods for assessing the effects of corrective actions, and (3) procedures for ensuring consideration of automated edits whenever possible, including for all existing NCDs and other national policies.

    Agency: Department of Health and Human Services: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: HHS concurred with this recommendation. CMS developed written procedures in November 2012 to provide guidance to agency staff on procedures for ensuring consideration of automated edits whenever possible, as GAO recommended in November 2012, but these procedures do not include several key elements of GAO's recommendation. For example, the written procedures do not include time frames for making decisions on whether an edit will be developed for all existing National Coverage Determinations (NCD) and national policies. The written procedures also do not include requirements for methods to assess the effects of corrective actions taken. Implementing a comprehensive written process for developing edits for national policies could help ensure that edits are implemented whenever possible to reduce improper payments. As of September 2017, CMS had not provided us updated documentation that addressed these aspects of our recommendation. Once received, we will review the information and update this recommendation accordingly.
    Director: Powner, David A
    Phone: (202) 512-9286

    5 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: To ensure that major steady state IT investments are being adequately analyzed, the Secretaries of Defense, Veterans Affairs, and the Treasury should direct appropriate officials to develop an OA policy, annually perform OAs on all investments, and ensure the assessments include all key factors.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: DOD has stated it is developing OA policy, but has yet to provide a timeframe for when it will be completed. In addition, we are waiting for fiscal year 2016 OAs.
    Recommendation: To ensure that major steady state IT investments are being adequately analyzed, the Secretaries of Defense, Veterans Affairs, and the Treasury should direct appropriate officials to develop an OA policy, annually perform OAs on all investments, and ensure the assessments include all key factors.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: The Department of Treasury has developed an OA policy and is currently performing OAs on investments. However, we are waiting for fiscal year 2016 investment OAs to determine if all key factors are being met.
    Recommendation: To ensure that major steady state IT investments are being adequately analyzed, the Secretaries of Defense, Veterans Affairs, and the Treasury should direct appropriate officials to develop an OA policy, annually perform OAs on all investments, and ensure the assessments include all key factors.

    Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
    Status: Open

    Comments: We are waiting for VA to provide its finalized OA policy and for fiscal year 2016 OAs.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services should direct their Chief Information Officers to ensure OAs are performed annually on all major steady state investments and the assessments include all key factors.

    Agency: Department of Homeland Security
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Homeland Security has updated their OA policy and is currently performing OAs on investments. We received fiscal year 2016 OAs for CBP but are waiting for the rest of the departments OAs for FY2016.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Homeland Security and Health and Human Services should direct their Chief Information Officers to ensure OAs are performed annually on all major steady state investments and the assessments include all key factors.

    Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
    Status: Open

    Comments: We are waiting for HHS's fiscal year 2016 OAs.
    Director: Goldenkoff, Robert N
    Phone: (202)512-3000

    2 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve the Bureau's process of organizational transformation, long-term planning, and strategic workforce planning for the 2020 Census, and thus better position the Bureau to carry out a cost-effective decennial census, the Secretary of Commerce should require the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs who oversees the Economics and Statistics Administration, as well as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau to, in order to ensure prioritization and timely completion of all necessary research and testing efforts, as well as timely transition to later 2020 Census phases, develop and implement a long-term planning schedule that includes key milestones and deadlines, including (1) deadlines for decisions that directly affect activity in later 2020 Census phases; (2) a schedule for creating, revising, or updating governance, program management, and system engineering and architecture plans to be used in later 2020 Census phases beyond research and testing; and (3) expected times of delivery for Bureau-wide enterprise tools, processes, and standards that 2020 Census planning would be expected to use.

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: Commerce agreed with this recommendation. Bureau officials released an operational plan in November 2015, including a high-level timeline for much of the remaining activity, but final schedules of delivery for Bureau-wide enterprise tools, processes, and standards are being revised and are not yet complete. In June 2016, officials announced that the Bureau would finalize its updated schedule in July 2016. To fully implement this recommendation, the Bureau needs to finalize program management and other governance documents applicable to the current and later phases of the decennial lifecycle, as well as finalizing schedules for delivery of Bureau-wide enterprise tools, processes, and standards. As of July 2017, Bureau officials reported they were working to provide artifacts they believe may address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To improve the Bureau's process of organizational transformation, long-term planning, and strategic workforce planning for the 2020 Census, and thus better position the Bureau to carry out a cost-effective decennial census, the Secretary of Commerce should require the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs who oversees the Economics and Statistics Administration, as well as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau to, in order to improve the Bureau's process for following up on Bureau and oversight agencies' recommendations to improve the 2020 Census, (1) assess the status of recommendation follow-up at regular intervals, such as every 12 months; and (2) periodically report on the status of recommendation follow-up--such as on the Bureau's intranet or Internet pages.

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: Commerce agreed with this recommendation. The Bureau assigns outstanding recommendations from GAO and others within the Bureau's knowledge management database to various leads, such as specific 2020 Census research and testing project teams. The Bureau regularly collates status updates on our open recommendations as well as the Office of Inspector General for reporting to department officials. The Bureau has begun quarterly meetings with us to discuss open GAO recommendations. When the status of its own internal recommendations -- such as from evaluations of its earlier tests -- is more visible inside and outside the Bureau, the Bureau's knowledge management will be better positioned to help the Bureau achieve goals of a cost-effective census. To fully implement this recommendation, the Bureau needs to implement mechanisms to capture lessons learned from its ongoing research and testing experience for recommendations in its database, and periodically report on the status of all open recommendations. As of July 2017, the Bureau is actively collecting artifacts, but has not yet provided evidence of either regular or open reporting on the status of other recommendations, such as from its own prior evaluations, ongoing tests, or the National Academy of Sciences.
    Director: Khan, Asif A
    Phone: (202) 512-3000

    4 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help provide for the successful implementation of Army and Air Force ERPs, and to help ensure that DFAS users have the training needed, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to ensure that time lines are established and monitored for those issues identified by DFAS that are impacting their efficient and effective use of GFEBS.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In commenting on the draft report, DOD concurred with the recommendation and cited action(s) being taken by the Army to ensure that time lines are established and monitored for those issues identified by DFAS that are impacting their efficient and effective use of GFEBS. We have made attempts to follow up with Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) Acquisition Technology and Logistics officials to obtain documentation of actions taken and to determine whether the Army has taken sufficient action to address this recommendation. However, as of July 2017, we have not been able to obtain documentation that supports that this recommendation was addressed.
    Recommendation: To help provide for the successful implementation of Army and Air Force ERPs, and to help ensure that DFAS users have the training needed, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Air Force to ensure that time lines are established and monitored for those issues identified by DFAS that are impacting their efficient and effective use of DEAMS.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In commenting on the draft report, DOD concurred with the recommendation and cited action(s) being taken by the Air Force to ensure that time lines are established and monitored for those issues identified by DFAS that are impacting their efficient and effective use of DEAMS. We have made attempts to follow up with Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) Acquisition Technology and Logistics officials to obtain documentation of actions taken to determine whether the Army has taken sufficient action to address this recommendation. However, as of July 2017, we have not been able to obtain documentation that supports that this recommendation was addressed.
    Recommendation: To help provide for the successful implementation of Army and Air Force ERPs, and to help ensure that DFAS users have the training needed, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to improve training for GFEBS users by providing training on actual job processes in a manner that allows users to understand how the new processes support their job responsibilities and the work they are expected to perform.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In commenting on the draft report, DOD concurred with the recommendation and cited action(s) being taken by the Army to improve training for GFEBS users on actual job processes. We have made attempts to follow up with Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) Acquisition Technology and Logistics officials to obtain documentation of actions taken to determine whether the Army has taken sufficient action to address this recommendation. However, as of July 2017, we have not been able to obtain documentation that supports that this recommendation was addressed.
    Recommendation: To help provide for the successful implementation of Army and Air Force ERPs, and to help ensure that DFAS users have the training needed, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Air Force to improve training for DEAMS users by providing training on actual job processes in a manner that allows users to understand how the new processes support their job responsibilities and the work they are expected to perform.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In commenting on the draft report, DOD concurred with the recommendation and cited action(s) being taken by the Air Force to improve training for DEAMS users on actual job processes. We have made attempts to follow up with Office of the Undersecretary of Defense (Comptroller) Acquisition Technology and Logistics officials to obtain documentation of actions taken to determine whether the Army has taken sufficient action to address this recommendation. However, as of July 2017, we have not been able to obtain documentation that supports that this recommendation was addressed.
    Director: Goldenkoff, Robert N
    Phone: (202)512-2757

    3 open recommendations
    Recommendation: In order to maintain progress in maximizing the efficiency of existing data sources, and to improve the broader efficiency of the federal statistical system and improve communication among agencies and others, the Director of OMB, in consultation with the Chief Statistician, should work with the ICSP, when OMB next updates guidance on agency survey and statistical information collection and dissemination methods, to include additional details on actions agencies can take to meet requirements to identify duplication, to consult with persons outside of the agency, and address other requirements as appropriate.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: OMB concurred with our recommendation. As of August 2017, the team is awaiting an update from the agency on the status of OMB's actions to implement this recommendation.
    Recommendation: In order to maintain progress in maximizing the efficiency of existing data sources, and to improve the broader efficiency of the federal statistical system and improve communication among agencies and others, the Director of OMB, in consultation with the Chief Statistician, should work with the ICSP to create new methods or enhance existing methods to improve the dissemination of information and resources produced by interagency statistical committees. For example, such enhancements could include increasing the timeliness and availability of information on websites to better capture the full range of products and identify committee priorities.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: OMB concurred with our recommendation and in July 2014 reported that it plans to implement it by launching a new website for the Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology. The new website will be hosted by the General Services Administration and will give interagency statistical committees the ability to manage their own webpages and disseminate products. As of August 2017, the team is awaiting an update from the agency on the status of OMB's actions to implement this recommendation.
    Recommendation: In order to maintain progress in maximizing the efficiency of existing data sources, and to increase the reliability of the information presented on the Reginfo.gov website and in OMB's internal system, the Director of OMB, in consultation with the Chief Statistician, should work with the ICSP to implement quality-control procedures designed to identify and remedy any differences between cost and burden information provided on the website and in the related supporting statement documentation that underlies this information.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: OMB concurred with our recommendation. As of August 2017, the team is awaiting an update from OMB on the status of actions taken to implement this recommendation.
    Director: Goldenkoff, Robert N
    Phone: (202)512-3000

    2 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: To improve the Bureau's ability to control costs for the 2020 decennial and balance cost and quality, the Secretary of Commerce should direct the Under Secretary of the Economics and Statistics Administration, as well as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau, to finalize how the Bureau will apply cost as an evaluation criterion for choosing among design alternatives for 2020 and ensure that all criteria are transparent, well documented, and consistently applied before alternatives are eliminated.

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open

    Comments: Commerce neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. According to the Census Bureau, each research and testing (R&T) project team was to develop a study plan outlining the goal of the project, the expected outcome, and the methodology to be used to arrive at data to inform trade off analysis and decision-making. To help ensure efficient use of resources for 2020 R&T projects, and that the conclusions reached by the projects were sound and provide decision makers with reliable findings, the Bureau planned to establish internal Scientific and Methodological Review Panels. These panels were to evaluate research designs, provide critical feedback and guidance to the research teams and assess the validity of any findings, conclusions and recommendations. In October 2015 the Bureau released an operational plan that described at a high level how cost was a consideration, but it did not lay out the criteria to be used. As of July 2017, we are following up with Census officials to obtain evidence that cost is being used as an evaluation criterion when choosing among design alternatives.
    Recommendation: GAO previously recommended that the Secretary of Commerce direct the Bureau to establish guidance, policies, and procedures for cost estimation that would meet best practice criteria. To help ensure that the Bureau produces a reliable and high-quality cost estimate for the 2020 Census, the Bureau should finalize guidance, policies, and procedures for cost estimation in accordance with best practices prior to developing the Bureau's initial 2020 life cycle cost estimate.

    Agency: Department of Commerce: Bureau of the Census
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: Commerce neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. In October 2015, the Bureau announced an estimate of its 2020 Census life-cycle cost. In our June 30, 2016 report (GAO-16-628), we assessed the Bureau's guidance, policies, and procedures underlying that estimate. We found that the Bureau's cost estimate partially met the characteristics of two best practices (comprehensive and accurate) described in the GAO Cost Guide and minimally met the other two (well-documented and credible). In addition, best practices state that a risk and uncertainty analysis should be performed to determine the level of risk associated with the cost estimate. The Bureau carried out such an analysis only for a portion of estimated costs for fiscal years 2018 to 2020, covering $4.6 billion. This amounts to about 37 percent of the $12.5 billion total estimated life-cycle cost, and less than one-half of the total estimated cost of the Bureau to comply with best practices for cost estimation. To fully implement this recommendation, the Bureau needs to implement specific controls over its cost estimation process for the 2020 Census, such as guidance that documents who is responsible for what and when, and what information flows where and when. As of July 2017, Bureau officials are currently gathering artifacts to support implementation of this recommendation.