Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "Government reform"

    26 publications with a total of 98 open recommendations including 13 priority recommendations
    Director: J. Christopher Mihm
    Phone: (202) 512-6806

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve the transparency of public reporting on CAP goal progress, the Director of OMB should, working with the PIC, report on Performance.gov the actions that CAP goal teams are taking, or plan to take, to develop performance measures and quarterly targets.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: We reviewed selected CAP goals quarterly performance information on the Performance.Gov website as of Q4 of FY 2016, which updates the status of the CAP goals through September 2016. Some of the selected CAP goals have updated and new performance measures, but it was not clear the extent to which CAP goal teams included information on the actions they are taking to develop such measures, consistent with our recommendation. We contacted OMB in June 2017 on the current status of this recommendation. We will provide an update to its status once OMB responds to our request.
    Director: Lori Rectanus
    Phone: (202) 512-2834

    7 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help improve the accuracy of Drive-thru data to allow agencies to better manage their leased-vehicle fleet data, the Administrator of GSA should evaluate the 9,999-mile/month electronic safeguard for Drive-thru odometer readings to determine if a lower threshold could improve the accuracy of customer data and adjust this safeguard accordingly.

    Agency: General Services Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: In January 2017, GSA reported that it had examined the reported monthly miles for all GSA Fleet leased vehicles for fiscal years 2015 and 2016. Analysis showed that there are a number of vehicles that consistently report mileage between 5,000-9,999 miles per month and that changing the threshold to 7,999 would require an average of 226 customers per month to override the electronic safeguard. GSA will not change the safeguard but will add a warning message when the monthly mileage exceeds 4,999 per month and is more than 3 times the vehicle's monthly average.
    Recommendation: To provide better assurance that Fleet Service Representatives (FSR) are having conversations with leasing customers about utilization in accordance with GSA expectations, the Administrator of GSA should develop a mechanism to help ensure that these conversations occur.

    Agency: General Services Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: In January 2017, GSA stated that it had reviewed the Customer Visit Checklist which FSRs use, and had codified a checklist to be used for all visits between FSRs and GSA Fleet customers. GSA provided GAO with a copy of the revised checklist. The new checklist includes a requirement to discuss vehicle utililization and the need to "right-size" a vehicle fleet.
    Recommendation: To help strengthen the leased-vehicle justification processes across federal agencies, the Administrator of GSA should examine the Federal Property Management Regulations to determine if these regulations should be amended to require that vehicle justifications are clearly documented and readily available, and adjust them accordingly.

    Agency: General Services Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: In March 2017, GSA reported that it had reviewed the Federal Property Management Regulations and determined that the section that relates to vehicle utilization (101-39.301) needs to be rewritten. GSA will draft a rewritten section of the FPMR. The draft will then undergo further a public review and comment period.
    Recommendation: To improve the justification process, the Secretary of the Department of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Air Force to modify the current process to ensure that each leased vehicle in the agency's fleet meets the agency's utilization criteria or has readily available justification documentation.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In March 2017, DOD provided GAO with a copy of a DOD memo that requires vehicles to meet utilization criteria or to have justifications electronic format or in hard copy with other vehicle information.
    Recommendation: To improve their justification process, the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs should direct the Under Secretary for Health to modify the current process to ensure that each leased vehicle in the agency's fleet meets the agency's utilization criteria or has readily available justification documentation.

    Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, VA stated that they were still working to address these recommendations.
    Recommendation: To facilitate the elimination of unnecessary vehicles, the Secretary of the Department of the Interior should direct the NPS Director to take corrective action to address each leased vehicle that has not met the agency's utilization criteria or passed the justification process. This corrective action could include (1) reassigning vehicles within the agency to ensure they are utilized or (2) returning vehicles to GSA.

    Agency: Department of the Interior
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2016, DOI provided documentation of steps it has taken to ensure vehicles have utilization or justification documentation as well as documentation of corrective action taken to address vehicles that have not passed these processes.
    Recommendation: To facilitate the elimination of unnecessary vehicles, the Secretary of the Department of Veterans Affairs should direct the Under Secretary for Health to take corrective action to address each leased vehicle that has not met the agency's utilization criteria or passed the justification process. This corrective action could include (1) reassigning vehicles within the agency to ensure they are utilized or (2) returning vehicles to GSA.

    Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of March 2017, VA was in the process of working with GSA to ensure that VA's new fleet management system could produce reports on utilization. VA is also in the process of amending its current fleet policy to reflect utilization criteria.
    Director: Mihm, J Christopher
    Phone: (202) 512-6806

    2 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To ensure that federal program spending data are provided to the public in a transparent, useful, and timely manner, the Director of OMB should accelerate efforts to determine how best to merge DATA Act purposes and requirements with the GPRAMA requirement to produce a federal program inventory.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: OMB staff stated that they expect to issue new guidance on the Program Management Improvement Accountability Act by the end of 2017. According to these staff, OMB expects that, within a year of issuing the new guidance, they will be able to move forward with plans to resume implementation of the federal program inventory. In October 2017, OMB staff told us they believe there are opportunities to leverage the DATA Act taxonomy in service to the goals of GPRAMA and they continue to work with their performance management colleagues on this effort. However, they said no formal progress has been made to identify programs for the purposes of DATA Act reporting.
    Recommendation: To ensure that the integrity of data standards is maintained over time, the Director of OMB, in collaboration with the Secretary of the Treasury, should establish a set of clear policies and processes for developing and maintaining data standards that are consistent with leading practices for data governance.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: OMB and Treasury have taken some initial steps to build a data governance structure standardizing data elements and definitions, conducting interviews with key stakeholders and developing a set of recommendations for decision-making authority. In September 2016, OMB and Treasury established a Data Standards Committee (DSC) that is responsible for advising OMB and Treasury, and providing recommendations on DATA Act data standards to the Executive Steering Committee (ESC) -- the decision making body regarding DATA Act and other data standards. According to OMB staff, the DSC meets on a monthly basis, but has not yet provided recommendations to OMB or to the ESC. OMB staff told us in October 2017 that, in accordance with their broader data governance mandates and overall transparency efforts, they are reviewing opportunities to incorporate and leverage other mandates and existing governance structures. As part of our ongoing feedback with OMB, we shared 5 key practices that we believe should inform their plans to develop a data governance framework moving forward.
    Director: J. Christopher Mihm
    Phone: (202) 512-6806

    5 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help ensure that agency review processes provide frequent, regular opportunities to assess progress on agency priority goals (APG), and are conducted in a manner consistent with GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) requirements, OMB guidance, and leading practices, the Secretary of Defense should work with the COO and PIO to modify the Department's review processes to ensure that review meetings are led by the agency head or COO.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In July 2017, Department of Defense (DOD) staff informed us that the department's quarterly performance reviews, which had been reinstituted in late 2016, have been put on hold while the department's new strategic plan is under development. According to DOD staff, the quarterly reviews will not resume until after the department's new strategic plan is approved and released. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that agency review processes provide frequent, regular opportunities to assess progress on agency priority goals (APG), and are conducted in a manner consistent with GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) requirements, OMB guidance, and leading practices, the Secretary of Defense should work with the COO and PIO to modify the Department's review processes to ensure that review meetings are used to review progress on all APGs at least once a quarter, discuss at-risk goals and improvement strategies, and assess whether specific program activities, policies, or other activities are contributing to goals as planned.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In July 2017, Department of Defense (DOD) staff informed us that the department's quarterly performance reviews, which had been reinstituted in late 2016, have been put on hold while the department's new strategic plan is under development. According to DOD staff, the quarterly reviews will not resume until after the department's new strategic plan is approved and released. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that agency review processes provide frequent, regular opportunities to assess progress on agency priority goals (APG), and are conducted in a manner consistent with GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) requirements, OMB guidance, and leading practices, the Secretary of Defense should work with the COO and PIO to modify the Department's review processes to ensure that review meetings are used by participants to identify, agree upon, document and track follow-up actions.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In July 2017, Department of Defense (DOD) staff informed us that the department's quarterly performance reviews, which had been reinstituted in late 2016, have been put on hold while the department's new strategic plan is under development. According to DOD staff, the quarterly reviews will not resume until after the department's new strategic plan is approved and released. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that agency review processes provide frequent, regular opportunities to assess progress on agency priority goals (APG), and are conducted in a manner consistent with GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) requirements, OMB guidance, and leading practices, the Secretary of State should work with the COO and PIO to modify the Department's review processes to ensure that progress on each APG is reviewed in an in-person review meeting at least quarterly.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open

    Comments: According to information provided by State Department staff in June 2017, efforts to address this recommendation are currently on hold until a new Chief Operating Officer (COO) for the department has been appointed. Once a new COO is in place the department plans to move forward with in-person quarterly reviews based on the COO's guidance. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that agency review processes provide frequent, regular opportunities to assess progress on agency priority goals (APG), and are conducted in a manner consistent with GPRA Modernization Act of 2010 (GPRAMA) requirements, OMB guidance, and leading practices, the Secretary of State should work with the COO and PIO to modify the Department's review processes to ensure that the reviews are led by the agency head or COO.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open

    Comments: According to information provided by State Department staff in June 2017, efforts to address this recommendation are currently on hold until a new Chief Operating Officer (COO) for the department has been appointed. Once a new COO is in place the department plans to move forward with in-person quarterly reviews based on the COO's guidance. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Director: Carol R. Cha
    Phone: (202) 512-4456

    27 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Commerce should ensure an inventory of mobile devices and services is established department-wide (i.e., all components' devices and associated services are accounted for).

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Commerce has not yet implemented this recommendation. In response to our report, the department said it planned to address the recommendation by the second quarter of fiscal year 2016. However, as of August 2017, it had not demonstrated that it had done so. We will continue to monitor the department's progress.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Commerce should ensure a reliable department-wide inventory of mobile service contracts is developed and maintained.

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Commerce has not yet implemented this recommendation. In response to our report, the department said it planned to address the recommendation by the second quarter of fiscal year 2016. However, as of August 2017, it had not demonstrated that it had done so. We will continue to monitor the department's progress.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Commerce should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Commerce has not yet implemented this recommendation. In response to our report, the department said it planned to address the recommendation by the second quarter of fiscal year 2016. However, as of August 2017, it had not demonstrated that it had done so. We will continue to monitor the department's progress.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Defense should ensure an inventory of mobile devices and services is established department-wide (i.e., all components' devices and associated services are accounted for).

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of August 2017, the Department of Defense had not implemented this recommendation. In July 2016, the department reported that it does not maintain a single, centralized device-level inventory and, instead, the military departments track and manage their own devices and contracted wireless services as separate enterprises. However, as we stated in our report, the inventory need not be generated centrally at the headquarters level; the department can compile a comprehensive inventory using its components' complete inventories. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Defense should ensure a reliable department-wide inventory of mobile service contracts is developed and maintained.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of August 2017, the Department of Defense had not implemented this recommendation. The department updated its mobile services contract inventory in August 2015; however, as of August 2017, the department had not demonstrated that it has maintained the inventory. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to implement the recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Health and Human Services should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Health and Human Services has not implemented this recommendation. In April 2016, an audit liaison in the Office of the Chief Information Officer reported that each component maintains processes and procedures for device management. However, as of August 2017, the department had not provided evidence that components have established procedures that address the elements of our recommendation. We will continue to monitor the department's implementation of this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure an inventory of mobile devices and services is established department-wide (i.e., all components' devices and associated services are accounted for).

    Agency: Department of Homeland Security
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Homeland Security has taken steps to implement this recommendation. Specifically, it developed inventories for the two components we reviewed. The department also reported that it had identified all components' devices. However, as of August 2017, it had not provided evidence that all the components had an inventory of unique devices and associated services. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to implement the recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure a reliable department-wide inventory of mobile service contracts is developed and maintained.

    Agency: Department of Homeland Security
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Homeland Security has taken steps to implement the recommendation, but more needs to be done. Specifically, in May 2017, the department developed an enterprise-wide inventory of mobile service contracts; however, the department has not demonstrated that it has maintained the inventory quarterly. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to fully implement the recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Homeland Security should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of Homeland Security
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Homeland Security has not implemented the recommendation. In August 2017, a Program Management Specialist in the Office of the Chief Information Office described steps the department was taking as it considers a follow-on to its department-wide blanket purchase agreement for wireless expense management services. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to implement the recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of the Interior should ensure an inventory of mobile devices and services is established department-wide (i.e., all components' devices and associated services are accounted for).

    Agency: Department of the Interior
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of the Interior has not implemented this recommendation. As of May 2017, the department was in the process of migrating its cellular service contracts to the General Services Administration's federal wireless strategic sourcing initiative blanket purchase agreement as its agency-wide solution for mobile devices and services. According to the department, the initiative requires awardee(s) and orderers to conduct a complete inventory of devices and legacy service contracts as they transition to the blanket purchase agreement. According to the department's transition plan, the transition is to be complete by February 2018. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to implement the recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of the Interior should ensure a reliable department-wide inventory of mobile service contracts is developed and maintained.

    Agency: Department of the Interior
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of the Interior has not implemented this recommendation. As of May 2017, the department was in the process of migrating its cellular service contracts to the General Services Administration's federal wireless strategic sourcing initiative blanket purchase agreement as its agency-wide solution for mobile devices and services. According to the department, the initiative requires awardee(s) and orderers to conduct a complete inventory of devices and legacy service contracts as they transition to the blanket purchase agreement. According to the department's transition plan, the transition is to be complete by February 2018. We will continue to monitor the department's efforts to implement the recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Attorney General should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of Justice
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Justice has taken steps to implement this recommendation. Specifically, in response to our findings, the department's Chief Information Officer issued a memo that required components to establish procedures for regular reviews of invoices for wireless services to identify unused and underused devices or services, as well as any over-usage charges to service plans. However, as of August 2017, the department had not demonstrated that its components had implemented the requirements. We will continue to monitor the department's progress.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of State should ensure an inventory of mobile devices and services is established department-wide (i.e., all components' devices and associated services are accounted for).

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of State has not yet implemented this recommendation. In July 2017, the department stated that it planned to transition its mobile devices and services to the General Services Administration's Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative. However, the department has not addressed developing an inventory of mobile devices and services. We will continue to monitor the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of State should ensure a reliable department-wide inventory of mobile service contracts is maintained.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of State has not implemented this recommendation. In July 2017, the department stated that it plans to transition its mobile devices and services to the General Services Administration's Federal Strategic Sourcing Initiative. However, the department has not addressed developing an inventory of mobile service contracts. We will continue to monitor the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of State should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of State
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of State has not yet implemented this recommendation. In July 2017, the department stated that it was in the process of implementing a Telecommunications Expense Management System to provide visibility into mobile spending, asset management, usage, and tracking. However, the department has not provided evidence that it has established procedures that address the elements of our recommendation . We will continue to monitor the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Transportation should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of Transportation
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Transportation has not yet demonstrated that it has implemented our recommendation. Specifically, as of August 2017, neither of the two components we reviewed in May 2015 had addressed the weaknesses we identified in their procedures. We will continue to monitor the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of the Treasury should ensure an inventory of mobile devices and services is established department-wide (i.e., all components' devices and associated services are accounted for).

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of the Treasury has not yet implemented this recommendation. In May 2016, the Department of the Treasury stated that it had performed data calls to collect data on mobile device inventories across the department. However, as of August 2017, the department had not demonstrated that it had established a department-wide inventory of mobile devices and services. We will monitor the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Veterans Affairs has not yet implemented this recommendation. The department stated that its Office of Information and Technology drafted documentation for the development and implementation of a system to manage spending on mobile devices and services. However, the solution had not been funded. The department stated that a target date for addressing the recommendation is December 2017, conditional upon available funds.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency should ensure a complete inventory of mobile devices and associated services is established.

    Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Environmental Protection Agency had taken steps to implement this recommendation. Specifically, it reported that it had conducted a management review and identified improvements to ensure that the agency has a complete inventory of mobile devices and services. However, as of August 2017, it had not demonstrated that it had established a complete inventory. We will continue to monitor the agency's progress.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established agency-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Environmental Protection Agency has not yet implemented this recommendation. The agency stated that program offices receive quarterly mobile device usage reports and are requested to review them. However, as of August 2017, the agency had not provided documented procedures that address the elements of our recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration should ensure a complete inventory of mobile devices and associated services is established.

    Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has not yet implemented the recommendation. In August 2017, officials from NASA's Office of the Chief Information Officer stated that the agency plans to address the recommendation through a strategic sourcing approach the agency is developing and estimates implementing in fiscal year 2018. The officials stated that the agency expects to fully address the recommendation by December 2018.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration should ensure a reliable inventory of mobile service contracts is developed and maintained.

    Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: The National Aeronautics Administration (NASA) has not yet implemented the recommendation. In August 2017, officials from NASA's Office of the Chief Information Officer stated that the agency plans to address the recommendation through a strategic sourcing approach the agency is developing and estimates implementing in fiscal year 2018. The officials stated that the agency expects to fully address the recommendation by March 2019.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established agency-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: The National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) has not implemented the recommendation. In August 2017, officials from NASA's Office of the Chief Information Officer stated that the agency plans to address the recommendation through an Enterprise Mobility Service Contract that it plans to fully transition to by July 2019. The officials stated that the contract will allow the agency to monitor and optimize usage.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should ensure a complete inventory of mobile devices and associated services is established.

    Agency: Social Security Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Social Security Administration (SSA) described steps it was taking to address our recommendation. Specifically, the agency stated that it had deployed and is operating a Mobile Expense Management System that will be used to maintain an enterprise-wide inventory of mobile devices and associated services once all the agency's mobile service contracts/accounts have been successfully consolidated onto one of the agency's blanket purchasing agreements. SSA expected to complete this consolidation in the September to October 2016 timeframe. However, as of August 2017, the agency had not demonstrated that it had implemented the recommendation. We will continue to monitor its progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the agency effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established agency-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Social Security Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Social Security Administration (SSA) described steps it was taking to address this recommendation. Specifically, the agency stated that representatives from various agency components were working to develop and document the policies, guidelines, processes, and procedures to effectively implement an enterprise model for mobile provisioning and management. SSA expects to complete this effort in fiscal year 2017. As of August 2017, the agency had not demonstrated that it had addressed the recommendation. We will continue to monitor its progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To help the department effectively manage spending on mobile devices and services, the Secretary of the Treasury should ensure procedures to monitor and control spending are established department-wide. Specifically, ensure that (1) procedures include assessing devices for zero, under, and over usage; (2) personnel with authority and responsibility for performing the procedures are identified; and (3) the specific steps to be taken to perform the process are documented.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of the Treasury has not yet implemented this recommendation. In May 2016, the department stated that it had awarded two contracts to facilitate mobile device management, and had advised its bureaus to track, analyze, and manage mobile device use and cost in accordance with GAO guidance at their level until migration to the department-wide contracts has been completed. However, as of August 2017, the department had not demonstrated that it had established department-wide procedures to monitor and control spending on mobile devices and services. We will continue to monitor the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To better enable OMB to oversee agency efforts to consolidate mobile telecommunications contracts, the Director should measure and report progress in achieving its goal of cost savings through consolidation, as described in the 2012 Digital Government Strategy.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of August 2017, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) had made progress in implementing this recommendation by requiring agencies to track savings; however, it had not yet reported progress in achieving its goal of cost savings. Specifically, in August 2016, OMB issued a policy requiring covered agencies to appoint, by November 2016, a dedicated lead for mobile devices and services. The official is expected to work closely with senior agency officials to establish and maintain an agency-wide inventory of mobile contracts, identify opportunities for contract consolidation, and track savings, among other things. In addition, according to an official in OMB's Office of Federal Procurement, a team led by OMB, the General Services Administration, and the departments of Defense and Homeland Security, is to develop an approach for measuring savings related to mobile devices and services.
    Director: Mark L. Goldstein
    Phone: (202) 512-2834

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: The FCC should conduct a program evaluation to determine the extent to which the Lifeline program is efficiently and effectively reaching its performance goals of ensuring the availability of voice service for low-income Americans while minimizing the contribution burden on consumers and businesses.

    Agency: Federal Communications Commission
    Status: Open

    Comments: In a 2016 Lifeline modernization order, which FCC adopted March 31, 2016, FCC instructed the Universal Service Administrative Company (USAC) to hire an outside, independent third-party evaluator to complete a program evaluation of the modernized Lifeline program. FCC noted that the program evaluation would enable FCC and the public to have better information about the operation and effectiveness of the Lifeline program. Such an evaluation will likely address our recommendation. FCC's order stipulated that USAC must submit the evaluation's findings to FCC by December 2020. We will update the status of this recommendation after we receive additional information from FCC.
    Director: Robert Goldenkoff
    Phone: (202) 512-2757

    3 open recommendations
    including 3 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To assist the interagency working group, known as the Federal Agency Skills Team (FAST), to better identify government-wide skills gaps having programmatic impacts and measure its progress towards closing them, the Director of OPM--in conjunction with the CHCO Council--should strengthen its approach and methodology by (1) assisting FAST in developing goals for closing skills gaps with targets that are both clear and measurable; (2) working with FAST to design outcome-oriented performance metrics that align with overall targets for closing skills gaps and link to the activities for addressing kills gaps; (3) incorporating greater input from subject matter experts, as planned; and (4) ensuring FAST consistently follows key practices for project planning.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of October 2016, OPM has sought to strengthen the methodology for closing skills gaps by offering skills gap closure training to 1) agency officials with respect to agency-specific skills gaps, and 2) interagency working groups with respect to government-wide skills gaps. Held during the spring of 2016, this OPM-led training sought to provide agency officials with methodologies for identifying the root causes for skills gaps, as well as provide assistance in developing action plans for implementing and monitoring their strategies to address these skills gaps. OPM officials stated that these interagency teams will report on a quarterly basis to the OPM Director on their progress to implement these strategies, beginning in January 2017. OPM, in conjunction with OMB, agencies, and the CHCO Council, needs to ensure that this infrastructure is implemented as developed.
    Recommendation: To ensure that OPM builds the predictive capacity to identify emerging skills gaps across the government--including the ability to collect and use reliable information on the competencies of the federal workforce for government-wide workforce analysis--the Director of OPM should (1) establish a schedule specifying when OPM will modify its Enterprise Human Resources Integration database to capture staffing data that it currently collects from agencies through its annual workforce data reporting process; and (2) work with agency CHCOs to bolster the ability of agencies to assess workforce competencies by sharing competency surveys, lessons learned, and other tools and resources.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of October 2016, officials reported that OPM has partnered with the Chief Learning Officers Council to leverage resources to develop a framework to support agencies efforts to develop competency assessments. Additionally, OPM reported that it has created an internal working group to determine whether its Enterprise Human Resources Integration (EHRI) personnel database can support having a predictive capacity for identifying emerging skills gaps across the government, including the ability to collect and use information on the competencies of the federal workforce. OPM needs to work with agencies to improve competency assessment across the government and to pursue modifying EHRI to support the collection of staffing and competency data.
    Recommendation: To help agencies and OPM better monitor progress toward closing skills gaps within agencies and government-wide, the Director of OPM should (1) work with the CHCO Council to develop a core set of metrics that all agencies should use as part of their HRstat data-driven reviews; and (2) coordinate with FAST personnel and explore the feasibility of collecting information needed by FAST as part of agencies' HRstat reviews.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of October 2016, officials reported that OPM has partnered with the CHCO Council to implement a government-wide set of metrics for use as part of a government-wide benchmarking effort. However, it has no plans to coordinate the data collection efforts of agencies' HRstat reviews with the collection efforts of OPM's and agencies' working groups to identify and address skills gaps. OPM stated that coordinating the data collection was not possible because agencies' HRstat reviews have different goals and collect different types of data than the working groups. We maintain that action on our recommendation is important because it is likely that the core metrics collected under HRstat could help inform the efforts of the working groups and thus reduce duplicative efforts. Moreover, the use of a core set of metrics from agencies' HRstat reviews could aid in monitoring actual progress in closing skills gaps government-wide.
    Director: David A. Powner
    Phone: (202) 512-9286

    10 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of HHS, the Interior, Justice, and Labor, and the Administrators of GSA and NASA should complete action plans for addressing their challenges in reporting cost savings, as discussed in this report.

    Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Health and Human Services agreed with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our recommendation. In June 2015, the department reported that it had begun an effort to calculate the tangible cost savings and avoidances derived from closing over 50 data centers as part of its data center consolidation efforts. As of March 2017, the department reported that it had closed a total of 74 data centers and had identified $6.64 million in cost savings and avoidances, which is approximately $2.30 million more than what we reported in September 2014. However, the identified cost savings does not include any savings from fiscal years 2015 or 2016. Accordingly, we conclude the department has not yet completed efforts to address challenges in calculating cost savings and avoidances. We will continue to evaluate the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of HHS, the Interior, Justice, and Labor, and the Administrators of GSA and NASA should complete action plans for addressing their challenges in reporting cost savings, as discussed in this report.

    Agency: Department of the Interior
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of the Interior agreed with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our recommendation. Specifically, in December 2014, the Interior's Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget established a series of steps toward addressing our recommendation. The steps include, for example, consolidating and streamlining data center consolidation reporting processes, developing a template that all department bureaus and offices are required to use, and issuing a directive requiring consistent reporting for all data center cost savings and avoidances. In addition, the department submitted a Data Center Optimization Initiative strategic plan to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in September 2016. In the plan, the department reported closing 53 data centers and achieving $4.4 million in cost savings and avoidances in fiscal year 2016. However, the plan does not indicate how the department will address identified challenges nor does it indicate whether the department has successfully implemented its directive on consistent monitoring of cost savings and avoidances. We will continue to evaluate the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of HHS, the Interior, Justice, and Labor, and the Administrators of GSA and NASA should complete action plans for addressing their challenges in reporting cost savings, as discussed in this report.

    Agency: Department of Labor
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Labor agreed with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our recommendation. In September 2015, the department stated that its Office of the Chief Information Officer was working to develop an enterprise data center inventory as part of the department-wide Data Center Consolidation Initiative Working Group. In September 2016, the department submitted its Data Center Optimization Initiative plan to the Office of Management and Budget. The plan reported that the department had closed 28 non-tiered data centers in fiscal year 2016 and indicated that the department had historical cost savings of $4.85 million to date. However, as of March 2017, the department had not yet reported any resulting cost savings or avoidances in its quarterly report to OMB. We will continue to evaluate the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Interior, Transportation, the Treasury, and Department of Veterans Affairs; the Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management should direct responsible officials to report all data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to OMB in accordance with established guidance.

    Agency: Department of Agriculture
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Agriculture agreed with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our recommendation. In September 2014, we found that the department reported fiscal year 2012 through 2015 cost savings and avoidances of $244.17 million to GAO, but had only reported $71.20 million to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)--a difference of approximately $172.97 million. Moreover, as of March 2017, the department still had not yet fully reported its savings to OMB, as we recommended. Specifically, the department had reported a total of about $25.07 million in cost savings and avoidances to OMB from fiscal years 2012 to 2016--an amount that is approximately $219.1 million short of the total savings and avoidances that the department had reported to GAO as of September 2014. We will continue to evaluate the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Interior, Transportation, the Treasury, and Department of Veterans Affairs; the Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management should direct responsible officials to report all data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to OMB in accordance with established guidance.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: DOD concurred with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our priority recommendation. In March 2016, we determined that the department had identified a total of about $1.07 billion in data center consolidation cost savings from fiscal year 2012 through 2016. However, as of March 2017, the department had not yet fully reported its savings to the Office of Management and Budget, as we recommended. Specifically, as of June 2016, the department reported $859 million in savings to the Office of Management and Budget--an amount $211 million less than the $1.07 billion previously reported to us. However, as of March 2017, the department only reported $331 million to the Office of Management and Budget--a decrease of $528 million and $739 million less than what was previously reported to us. In light of the department's considerable planned savings, and the significant decrease in what is being reported, full and accurate reporting by the department is critical toward ensuring that the Office of Management and Budget and Congress have the ability to oversee DOD's progress against key data center consolidation initiative goals.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Interior, Transportation, the Treasury, and Department of Veterans Affairs; the Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management should direct responsible officials to report all data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to OMB in accordance with established guidance.

    Agency: Department of the Interior
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of the Interior agreed with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our recommendation. In September 2014, we found that the department had reported fiscal year 2012 to 2015 cost savings and avoidances of $84.42 million to GAO, but had only reported $13.59 million to OMB--a difference of approximately $70.83 million. Moreover, as of February 2017, the department had not yet fully reported its savings to OMB, as we recommended. Specifically, the department had reported a total of about $13.61 million in cost savings and avoidances to OMB from fiscal years 2012 to 2016--an amount that is approximately $70.81 million short of the total savings and avoidances that the department had reported to GAO as of September 2014. We will continue to evaluate the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Interior, Transportation, the Treasury, and Department of Veterans Affairs; the Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management should direct responsible officials to report all data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to OMB in accordance with established guidance.

    Agency: Department of Transportation
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Department of Transportation agreed with our recommendation, but had not yet taken steps to implement it. In September 2014, we found that the department had reported fiscal year 2012 to 2015 cost savings and avoidances of $140.18 million to GAO, but had only reported $7.36 million to OMB--a difference of approximately $132.82 million. However, in February 2017, the department had still only reported a total of $4.89 million in data center consolidation savings and avoidance to OMB. We will continue to evaluate the department's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Interior, Transportation, the Treasury, and Department of Veterans Affairs; the Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management should direct responsible officials to report all data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to OMB in accordance with established guidance.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: Treasury did not comment on this recommendation and has not comprehensively reported cost savings and avoidances, as we recommended. For example, as of March 2017, Treasury had reported about $1.14 billion in data center consolidation-related cost avoidances in its quarterly report to OMB--an increase of about $734 million compared to a previous report. However, the department has not yet reported to OMB other cost avoidances totaling about $210 million that the department had previously reported to us. We will continue to monitor Treasury's progress against this recommendation.
    Recommendation: The Secretaries of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, the Interior, Transportation, the Treasury, and Department of Veterans Affairs; the Administrators of the Environmental Protection Agency and NASA; and the Director of the Office of Personnel Management should direct responsible officials to report all data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to OMB in accordance with established guidance.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Office of Personnel Management agreed with our recommendation, but has not yet taken steps to implement it. In September 2014, we found that the agency had reported fiscal year 2012 to 2015 cost savings and avoidances of $3.40 million to GAO, but had not reported any of its savings and avoidances to the Office of Management and Budget as required. As of March 2017, the agency had not yet reported any data center consolidation cost savings and avoidances to the Office of Management and Budget. We will continue to evaluate the agency's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To better ensure that the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative (FDCCI) improves governmental efficiency and achieves cost savings, the Director of OMB should direct the Federal chief information officer (CIO) to utilize the existing PortfolioStat review sessions to assist the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Interior, Justice, Labor, the General Services Administration (GSA), and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) in identifying data center consolidation cost savings opportunities.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) agreed with, and has taken initial steps to implement, our recommendation. Specifically, in June 2015, OMB issued a memorandum that discussed the fiscal year 2015 PortfolioStat requirements, including that agencies should hold PortfolioStat sessions on a quarterly basis (versus annually, as done previously) with OMB, the agency chief information officer, and other attendees. The memorandum also stated that, during these sessions, agencies are expected to discuss a strategy to reduce duplication and waste within the IT portfolio of the agency, identify projected cost savings resulting from such strategy, and identify ways to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of IT investments, among other things. However, as of March 2017, several agencies were still reporting limited savings from their consolidation efforts. For example, the Department of Transportation reported closing 146 data centers through February 2017, but had reported only $4.9 million in savings. As another example, the Department of Labor reported closing 25 data centers through February 2017, but reported no resulting cost savings. Until OMB assists these agencies with limited or no cost savings reported, they may not be able to identify the full extent of savings from their consolidation efforts. We will continue to evaluate OMB's progress in implementing this recommendation.
    Director: Lorelei St. James
    Phone: (202) 512-2834

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve information needed for USPS and congressional decision making as well as transparency for all stakeholders, USPS's executive leaders should collect and analyze updated data on delivery mode costs and the potential savings from converting delivery points to less costly modes of delivery and establish a time frame for publicly reporting the results.

    Agency: United States Postal Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: USPS plans to implement this recommendation by May 2018. According to USPS, this will require additional data collection and analysis. For example, USPS plans to assess its delivery network to understand the potential for converting delivery points, but has not yet collected data on the potential savings of large-scale conversions from door delivery to other modes of delivery. USPS stated that for each delivery point, USPS will need to analyze the location, property rights, zoning laws, and logistical and other legal issues. In addition, USPS said it planned future research to understand the impact of delivery mode conversion on mail volume and revenue.
    Director: Mackin, Michele
    Phone: (202) 512-4841

    1 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: To help mitigate confusion about the use of reverse auctions in federal acquisitions, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget should take steps to amend the FAR to address agencies' use of reverse auctions.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: In providing comments on this report, OMB generally concurred with this recommendation but, as of July 2017, had not yet publicly released a draft of any related proposed FAR rule(s). In July 2017, OMB staff stated that a FAR team had drafted proposed regulatory changes to address the use of reverse auctions in response to GAO's recommendation. OMB staff said that the draft changes were undergoing review and they expected they would be published for public comment before the end of the calendar year.
    Director: Engel, Gary T
    Phone: (202)512-8815

    2 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve the reliability of the information presented in the CFS budget statements, the Secretary of the Treasury should direct the Fiscal Assistant Secretary, working in coordination with the Controller of OMB's Office of Federal Financial Management, to establish and implement effective procedures for reporting amounts in the CFS budget statements that are fully consistent with the underlying information in significant federal entities' audited financial statements and other financial data.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of the completion of our fiscal year 2016 consolidated financial statements (CFS) audit, Treasury and OMB agreed that this recommendation remained open. Treasury partnered with the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board (FASAB) to develop a Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards exposure draft that identifies items needed to reconcile net cost to outlays at the entity level, with a focus on demonstrating consistency with significant entities' audited financial statements. We will follow-up on progress made by Treasury and OMB as part of our fiscal year 2017 CFS audit, which is ongoing as of March 2017.
    Recommendation: To improve the reliability of the information presented in the CFS budget statements, the Secretary of the Treasury should direct the Fiscal Assistant Secretary, working in coordination with the Controller of OMB's Office of Federal Financial Management, to establish and implement effective procedures for identifying and reporting all items needed to prepare the CFS budget statements.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of the completion of our fiscal year 2016 consolidated financial statements (CFS) audit, Treasury and OMB agreed that this recommendation remained open. Treasury has improved its process for preparing the budget statements over the past three years and is continuing to do so. For example, Treasury has developed a reconciliation process to ensure that all cash related amounts reconcile on a monthly basis. We will follow-up on progress made by Treasury and OMB as part of our fiscal year 2017 CFS audit, which is ongoing as of March 2017.
    Director: Mihm, J Christopher
    Phone: (202)512-3236

    3 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To enhance the value of Performance.gov for intended audiences and improve the ability to identify and prioritize potential improvements, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget--working with the Performance Improvement Council and the General Services Administration--should clarify the ways that intended audiences could use the information on the Performance.gov website to accomplish specific tasks and specify the design changes that would be required to facilitate that use.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: In July 2017, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) staff informed us that they will be partnering with a vendor to redesign Performance.gov to improve its usability and the accessibility of information on the website. They plan to launch the new site in February 2018, concurrent with the President's Budget for fiscal year 2019. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To enhance the value of Performance.gov for intended audiences and improve the ability to identify and prioritize potential improvements, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget--working with the Performance Improvement Council and the General Services Administration--should seek to more systematically collect information on the needs of a broader audience, including through the use of customer satisfaction surveys and other approaches recommended by HowTo.gov.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: In July 2017, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) staff informed us that they will be partnering with a vendor to redesign Performance.gov, and that they plan to launch the new site in February 2018, concurrent with the President's Budget for fiscal year 2019. To inform this redesign, OMB staff said that they plan to engage a wide range of stakeholders, including Congress, federal agency managers and staff, and interested members of the public and outside organizations. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To enhance the value of Performance.gov for intended audiences and improve the ability to identify and prioritize potential improvements, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget--working with the Performance Improvement Council and the General Services Administration--should seek to ensure that all performance, search, and customer satisfaction metrics, consistent with leading practices outlined in HowTo.gov, are tracked for the website, and, where appropriate, create goals for those metrics to help identify and prioritize potential improvements to Performance.gov.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: In July 2017, Office of Management and Budget (OMB) staff informed us that they will be partnering with a vendor to redesign Performance.gov, and that they plan to launch the new site in February 2018, concurrent with the President's Budget for fiscal year 2019. They said that as part of this redesign they plan to ensure that recommended metrics for the website are tracked. We will continue to monitor the status of actions to address this recommendation.
    Director: Mihm, J Christopher
    Phone: (202) 512-6806

    2 open recommendations
    Recommendation: When such revisions are made, the Director of OMB should work with the Performance Improvement Council to test and implement these provisions.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, OMB has not yet taken action to address this recommendation. According to information provided by OMB and PIC staff in June 2015, although OMB revised its guidance as we recommended, it did not work with the PIC to test implementation of these provisions. Instead, they told us that both PIC and OMB staff ensure agencies are implementing these provisions of their guidance when reviewing agencies' APG quarterly update submissions. However, our analysis of agencies' APG updates in October 2016 found implementation of these provisions continues to be mixed. In July 2017, OMB staff stated that they are developing new guidance and are in the process of obtaining agencies' views prior to publication. We will continue to monitor progress.
    Recommendation: In addition, as OMB works with agencies to enhance Performance.gov to include additional information about APGs, the Director of OMB should ensure that agencies adhere to OMB's guidance for website updates by providing a description of how input from congressional consultations was incorporated into each APG.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, OMB has taken limited actions to address this recommendation. In June 2015, OMB staff stated that they would focus agency attention on congressional consultations and publishing relevant input from those consultations during the development of the 2016-2017 APGs. OMB and agencies published information about the 2016-2017 APGs on Performance.gov in October 2015. However, our analysis of relevant sections of Performance.gov in October 2016 generally found that either agencies did not include information about congressional input or they had not updated Performance.gov to reflect the most recent round of stakeholder engagement. In July 2017, OMB staff said that they plan on highlighting the requirement for congressional consultation as they update the 2018-2019 APGs, which are to be published in February 2018. We will continue to monitor progress.
    Director: Mihm, J Christopher
    Phone: (202) 512-6806

    4 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve performance management staff capacity to support performance management in federal agencies, the Director of OPM, in coordination with the PIC and the Chief Learning Officer (CLO) Council, should work with agencies to identify competency areas needing improvement within agencies.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out to Performance Improvement Council (PIC) and Office of Management and Budget staff in November 2016 and February 2017 for an update on the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response. In May 2016, the PIC had reported that it has an ongoing series of survey and focus group work that includes some issues related to learning needs, but that they do not address competency areas directly as the PIC community does not find this framework useful.
    Recommendation: To improve performance management staff capacity to support performance management in federal agencies, the Director of OPM, in coordination with the PIC and the CLO Council, should work with agencies to identify agency training that focuses on needed performance management competencies.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out to Performance Improvement Council (PIC) and Office of Management and Budget staff in November 2016 and February 2017 for an update on the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response. In May 2016, the PIC had reported that it had created and was piloting performance training to test the best way to make this training available to a broad audience. Previously, the PIC had planned to use a website, LearnPerformance.gov, to make courses on performance management competencies available. According to the PIC, the website had been taken down and there is ongoing discussion about what to do in its place.
    Recommendation: To improve performance management staff capacity to support performance management in federal agencies, the Director of OPM, in coordination with the PIC and the CLO Council, should work with agencies to share information about available agency training on competency areas needing improvement.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out to Performance Improvement Council (PIC) and Office of Management and Budget staff in November 2016 and February 2017 for an update on the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response. In May 2016, the PIC had reported that it had created and was piloting performance training to test the best way to make this training available to a broad audience. Previously, the PIC had planned to use a website, LearnPerformance.gov, to make courses on performance management competencies available. According to the PIC, the website had been taken down and there is ongoing discussion about what to do in its place.
    Recommendation: To ensure that the PIC has a clear plan for accomplishing its goals and evaluating its progress, the Director of OMB should work with the PIC to update its strategic plan and review the PIC's goals, measures, and strategies for achieving performance, and revise them if appropriate.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out in November 2016 and February 2017 to staff at the Office of Management and Budget and Performance Improvement Council regarding the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response.
    Director: Melvin, Valerie C
    Phone: (202) 512-6304

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To better ensure that GCSS-Army implements effective risk management and project monitoring and control practices, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to direct the GCSS-Army program office to specify the roles and responsibilities of the IV&V agent to ensure that it acts as a third party that validates and verifies the risks and mitigation plans developed by the program office and system integrator.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: According to officials from Army's Program Executive Office Enterprise Information Systems in July 2017, the Army is working to draft an updated independent verification and validation policy in response to our recommendation. These officials expected the policy to be signed by the Program Executive Officer later this summer. We will continue to follow-up with the Army regarding this draft policy and the implementation of this recommendation.
    Director: Wilshusen, Gregory C
    Phone: (202)512-6244

    2 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To effectively implement key components of the IRS information security program, the Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue should update policies and procedures to ensure that they address (1) both methods available for granting all users access to mainframe resources, (2) audit and monitoring of access from one processing environment to another, (3) use of appropriate accounts by multiple databases on a single server, (4) data storage shared between systems, (5) out-of-date security standards, and (6) reconciliation of access privileges.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: We are evaluating IRS's implementation of this recommendation as part of the audit of IRS's FY 2017 financial statements.
    Recommendation: To effectively implement key components of the IRS information security program, the Acting Commissioner of Internal Revenue should update mainframe test and evaluation processes to improve periodic monitoring of compliance with IRS policies.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury: Internal Revenue Service
    Status: Open

    Comments: We are evaluating IRS's implementation of this recommendation as part of the audit of IRS's FY 2017 financial statements.
    Director: Pickup, Sharon L
    Phone: (202)512-9619

    2 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To enhance DOD's ability to set strategic direction for its business transformation efforts, better assess overall progress toward business transformation goals, and take any necessary corrective actions, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Deputy Secretary of Defense, in his capacity as the Chief Management Officer (CMO), to ensure that the SMP includes a description of the key business transformation challenges to be addressed, sufficient context for why specific goals and strategies were chosen, and measures to address core activities.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: DOD partially concurred with this recommendation, noting that future releases of the Strategic Management Plan will include key business transformation challenges, context for the inclusion of specific goals and strategies, and measures to address core activities. However, in its response, DOD also noted that the Department's senior leaders will continue to make strategic choices about which broad goals are most important and, within those goals, on which initiatives and key indicators they will focus their management attention. On July 1, 2013, DOD issued the FY 2014-2015 Strategic Management Plan. DOD subsequently issued its Agency Strategic Plan in place of the Strategic Management Plan to comply with GPRA Act Modernization Act requirements. In May 2017, the Acting Deputy Chief Management Officer (DCMO) issued a memorandum to DOD components. The memo directed implementation of DOD's Agency Reform Plan and a strategic planning framework, including the Agency Strategic Plan. As part of DOD's Agency Reform plan and strategic planning framework, each component is tasked with reviewing all business operations and proposing reform initiatives to improve efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability. The initial deadline for this review is September 2017. As part of the terms of reference, DOD components are also asked to identify goals and measures to monitor progress. We believe that the identification of reform initiatives will meet the intent of this recommendation. We will confirm after September 2017 that these initiatives have been identified.
    Recommendation: To enhance DOD's ability to set strategic direction for its business transformation efforts, better assess overall progress toward business transformation goals, and take any necessary corrective actions, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Deputy Secretary of Defense, in his capacity as the CMO, to further define DOD's performance management approach, by outlining elements such as how it will consider the various sources of performance information along with SMP performance results to monitor progress in achieving business goals and identify corrective actions and ensure this information is reviewed on a regular basis.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: DOD concurred with this recommendation, noting that the Department will continue to improve and institutionalize operations of the Defense Business Council to provide unified direction and leadership to efficiently and effectively manage the DOD business mission area. However, as of July 31, 2013, the Secretary of Defense had not issued any guidance directing the Deputy Secretary of Defense to further define DOD's performance management approach for business transformation, nor had the Deputy Secretary of Defense issued any guidance defining this approach. DOD subsequently issued its Agency Strategic Plan in place of the Strategic Management Plan to comply with GPRA Act Modernization Act requirements. In May 2017, the Acting DCMO issued a memorandum outlining to DOD components. The memo directed implementation of DOD's Agency Reform Plan and a strategic planning framework, including the Agency Strategic Plan. The DOD strategic planning framework is intended to align DOD core business functions with the Office of Management and Budget's Agency Reform Plan categories. DOD expects to complete this framework in September 2017. As part of this framework, DOD components are tasked with conducting thorough reviews of their business operations, identifying reform initiatives, and developing performance goals and measures to monitor and assess implementation of reform initiatives. We believe the establishment of this framework will meet the intent of our recommendation. We will confirm after September 2017 that this framework has been completed.
    Director: Woods, William T
    Phone: (202) 512-4841

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To ensure that DOD organizations fully comply with interagency acquisition regulations, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Office of Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy, as part of its ongoing interagency acquisition policy review, to ensure that its acquisition regulations, policies, and guidance on interagency contracting are updated to reflect new Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) rules, including those related to a best procurement approach determination.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In September 2014, DOD revised its acquisition regulations to incorporate additional guidance to ensure awareness of the total cost of interagency acquisitions, including fees, as part of making a determination that use of another agency's contract is in the best interest of DOD. However, DOD's regulations and guidance still do not reflect all of the factors described in the FAR which should be considered in making these determinations. In particular, DOD's regulations still do not mention assessing whether the requesting agency has the expertise to place orders and administer them against the selected contract vehicle throughout the acquisition lifecycle. In September 2017, DOD policy officials drafted new guidance to ensure that contracting officers document these factors, but this draft guidance is in the process of being reviewed and is not yet final.
    Director: Khan, Asif A
    Phone: (202) 512-9869

    5 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to assure the effectiveness of the UCFR process as a compensating control for confirming the accuracy of its military pay, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to revise AR 37-104-4, Military Pay and Allowances Policy, to establish a requirement for periodic monitoring of the effectiveness of unit commander UCFR reviews.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, DOD and Army officials told us that the Army and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) performed an analysis of the effectiveness of the Unit Commander Finance Report (UCFR) in preventing payroll errors. The officials shared a February 21, 2013, Army memo on the results of the analysis, which indicated that while the UCFR was an effective tool as a snapshot of a Soldier's pay, it was not comprehensive enough to provide the level of detail needed to manage many pay entitlements. Additionally, analytical results showed that in most cases, having units certify and return UCFRs to the Finance Office did not result in corrective action in the month the condition requiring action first appeared on the report. The officials told us the Army intends to rely on existing primary controls over pay transactions and the implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A), which was targeted for implementation in 2017, to address the issues we reported rather than revising AR-37-104-4 to require certification of the UCFR and its return to the Finance Office. The Army concluded that if used properly, the UCFR could provide a secondary control for units to identify a limited number of pay discrepancies. The Army's Finance Command Director subsequently told us that because the analysis showed that the UCFR was not being used as an effective tool by unit commanders, the Army would continue to pursue methods to improve pay transaction timeliness through training and command awareness efforts, to include use of the UCFR, pending implementation of IPPS-A. For example, the Army expanded the list of entitlements that, similar to UCFRs, are sent to commands for review and increased the frequency of the command reviews. The Army also implemented a process for monitoring high-risk special pays that have an anniversary date, such as Foreign Language Proficiency Bonus, Basic Allowance for Housing, and Basic Allowance for Subsistence, and confirming that the certifications have not expired. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. We will continue to assess DOD's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to assure the effectiveness of the UCFR process as a compensating control for confirming the accuracy of its military pay, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to revise AR 37-104-4, Military Pay and Allowances Policy, to require unit commanders to review and submit documentation showing completion of all monthly UCFR reviews.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, DOD and Army officials told us that the Army and Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) performed an analysis of the effectiveness of the Unit Commander Finance Report (UCFR) in preventing late transactions for updating pay. The results of an Army analysis showed that units certifying and returning UCFRs to the Finance Office did not increase timely corrective actions being taken to a soldier's pay. In a memo dated Feb. 21, 2013, the Army stated, "Creating a mandatory process of requiring Commanders to certify and return the UCFR (even when there are no errors) imposes additional administrative requirements and associated costs on the unit, the Finance Office and DFAS." The memo further stated that, based on the sample taken, most units are already certifying UCFRs and returning them to Finance -- with little impact on Soldiers' pay." Army officials told us that based on the Feb. 21, 2013, memo and subsequent follow up, the Army intended to rely on existing primary controls over pay transactions and the implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) targeted for August 2017 to address the issues we reported, rather than revise AR-37-104-4 to require certification of the UCFR and its return to the Finance Office. Army officials told us they would continue to pursue methods to improve pay transaction timeliness through training and command awareness efforts, to include use of the UCFR. The Army stated that the development and fielding of IPPS-A offers opportunities for reducing errors and manual inputs, while providing improved transaction timeliness and pay accuracy. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. We will continue to assess DOD's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to assure the effectiveness of the UCFR process as a compensating control for confirming the accuracy of its military pay, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Secretary of the Army to revise AR 37-104-4, Military Pay and Allowances Policy, to specify the time frame for submitting UCFRs, such as no later than the 10th of the month.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In a Feb. 21, 2013 memo, the Army stated that its regulations require units to take immediate action when an error is discovered during a review of an Unit Commander Finance Report (UCFR). According to the Army, specifying a timeframe for the review and submission of UCFRs, such as 10 days, would also require the development of additional controls and monitoring procedures and create exceptions/waivers for those units deployed or on training exercises. As a result, the Army intended to rely on existing primary controls over pay transactions and the targeted implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) in August 2017 to address the issues, rather than revise AR-37-104-4. With the slippage in implementation of IPPS-A integrated military personnel and pay functionality to April 2020, the Army needs to reconsider our recommendation along with reasonable timeline accommodations for deployed units. We will continue to assess the Army's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to provide a means for monitoring the overall accuracy of the Army's military payroll, the Secretary of Defense should direct the DOD Comptroller to require DFAS-IN to develop criteria and establish a comprehensive metric to capture and measure all types of pay errors affecting accuracy.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS)-Indianapolis Director told us that DFAS conducted a gap analysis for two installations (Ft. Carson and Ft. Gordon). This analysis compared data on the effective date of pay impacting transactions (e.g., Basic Allowance for Housing, Foreign Language Proficiency Pay, etc.); the date transactions were entered into the pay system; the elapsed time in days from the effective date through each step of the process to the date pay was input to the military pay system. The Army's analysis concluded that most errors that occurred were due to units' late submissions of source documents. The Army's position is that the key metric for military pay accuracy is the timeliness of processing of pay impacting transactions. The Army intended to rely on the targeted August 2017 implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System-Army (IPPS-A) to address pay transaction timeliness and address any other identified issues rather than require DFAS-Indianapolis to develop additional criteria and metrics within the current systems environment to measure all types of conditions affecting accuracy. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. We will continue to assess DOD's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To strengthen the design of controls over active duty Army military payroll, and to provide a means for monitoring the overall accuracy of the Army's military payroll, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Department of Defense (DOD) Comptroller to require DFAS-IN to establish an interim mechanism at DFAS-IN for identifying and analyzing the extent and causes of all types of military payroll errors processed by Defense Military Pay Offices (DMPOs), Army Finance Offices, Defense Joint Military Pay System-Active Component (DJMS-AC), and Case Management System (CMS) to address any systemic control weaknesses.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: In June 2013, DOD and Army officials stated that DFAS, as part of its pre-assertion audit readiness efforts for the Military Pay Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 16, Reporting on Controls at a Service Organization examination, has identified and validated many controls over the completeness, accuracy and validity of military pay. This included identifying gaps in internal controls and developing and implementing corrective action plans to mitigate any gaps. The Army subsequently engaged another independent public accounting firm to assess its audit readiness for the Statement of Budgetary Resources, including audit readiness for its military pay. In addition, the Army underwent an audit of its fiscal year 2015 General Fund Schedule of Budgetary Activity. Both audit engagements identified military pay issues requiring corrective action. Most recently, the audit of the Army's fiscal year 2016 Budgetary Schedule resulted in a disclaimer of opinion, in part, due to the Army's inability to produce a complete and accurate population of accession, separation, promotion/reduction, special pay, and leave populations for Active Duty, Reserve, and Guard soldiers. In January 2016, the Army auditor reported that "without the ability to produce complete populations, the risk exists that a soldier is improperly accessed, separated, promoted/reduced, awarded special pay, and/or had his or her leave account adjusted incorrectly. Further, the Army's ability to identify and correct any errors is significantly reduced, potentially misstating payroll obligations and outlays reported on the schedule." Army officials stated that it intends to rely on its current transaction timeliness metrics, pre-payment statistical sampling, Improper Payment Elimination and Reporting Act (IPERA) reporting, and eventually implementation of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System - Army (IPPS-A) to address the issues regarding completeness, accuracy, and validity of military pay. However, DOD's May 2017 FIAR Plan Status Report showed that the Army's IPPS-A is not expected to be fully implemented until April 2020. Therefore, we believe that the Army needs to revisit our recommendation and establish an interim mechanism for identifying and analyzing the extent and causes of military payroll errors and take appropriate action to address any systemic control weaknesses. We will continue to assess the Army's efforts to address this recommendation.
    Director: Gaffigan, Mark E
    Phone: (202) 512-3841

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help ensure that EM more effectively manages all its projects, the Secretary of Energy should direct the Senior Advisor for Environmental Management and the Director of the Office of Management, as appropriate, to provide the Office of Acquisition and Project Management with information on EM's project classification decisions to ensure that all capital asset projects have been appropriately classified and are managed in accordance with DOE Order 413.3B.

    Agency: Department of Energy
    Status: Open

    Comments: When commenting on our report, DOE agreed with our recommendation. According to agency information provided in March 2017, DOE has ongoing internal discussions to develop and document a policy addressing EM capital asset project and operations activity classifications. However, DOE has not yet established and approved such a policy.
    Director: Chaplain, Cristina T
    Phone: (202) 512-4841

    2 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve departmentwide strategic sourcing efforts at DOD, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Office of Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to issue direction that (1) sets goals for spending managed through strategic sourcing vehicles, (2) establishes procedures for the identification and tracking of departmentwide and component strategic sourcing efforts through the PASS office, (3) implements the PASS office strategic sourcing guidance, (4) links strategic sourcing to its Better Buying Power memorandum, and (5) establishes metrics, such as utilization rates, to track progress toward these goals.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: DOD concurred with our recommendation. To fully implement this recommendation, DOD should improve department-wide strategic sourcing efforts to achieve significant cost savings. DOD has been working with the Office of Management and Budget's Category Management Leadership Council to determine appropriate strategic sourcing goals, but specific goals and corresponding metrics have not yet been established.
    Recommendation: To improve departmentwide strategic sourcing efforts at DOD, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Office of Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics to identify and evaluate the best way to strategically source DOD's highest spending categories of products and services (e.g., governmentwide vehicles, interagency collaboration, departmentwide vehicles).

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: DOD concurred with our recommendation. To fully implement this recommendation, DOD should improve department-wide strategic sourcing efforts to achieve significant cost savings. DOD has been working with the Office of Management and Budget's Category Management Leadership Council to determine appropriate strategic sourcing goals, but specific goals and corresponding metrics have not yet been established.
    Director: Scire, Mathew J
    Phone: (202) 512-8678

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help meet the requirements of the Recovery Act's Section 1602 provisions to help ensure the long-term viability of the buildings, the Secretary of the Treasury should assess the extent to which HFAs are utilizing information provided to them by project owners duringthe 15-year compliance period, taking into account the level of investor equity in projects.

    Agency: Department of the Treasury
    Status: Open

    Comments: In an email from Treasury on September 14, 2015, officials stated that they have taken no additional actions since the report was issued. At that time, they sent copies of the report to the state HFAs with instructions for the HFAs to fulfill their duties. However, this does not insure the HFAs maintain their asset management responsibilities during the 15 year compliance period as required by Section 1602. On January 24, 2017, the agency informed us that they plan no further action on this recommendation.
    Director: Mackin, Michele
    Phone: (202)512-3000

    3 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve oversight of the limitations on subcontracting clause and to clarify who has responsibility for monitoring compliance with the clause, the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, in consultation with the Administrator of SBA, should provide specific guidance (including data collection options) to agency officials, including to contracting officers, about how to monitor the extent of subcontracting under 8(a) contracts, including for orders under indefinite quantity contracts.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget: Office of Federal Procurement Policy
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) agreed with the recommendation. In summer of 2017 we followed up to see what actions they had taken to implement the recommendation, but we did not receive any updates. GAO will continue to monitor OFPP's actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To improve oversight of the limitations on subcontracting clause and to clarify who has responsibility for monitoring compliance with the clause, the Administrator of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy, in consultation with the Administrator of SBA, should take actions to amend the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) to (1) direct contracting officers at agencies that have been delegated responsibility for ensuring compliance with the limitations on subcontracting clause to document in the contract file the steps they have taken to ensure compliance and (2) clarify the percentage of work required by an 8(a) participant under indefinite quantity contracts.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget: Office of Federal Procurement Policy
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) agreed with the recommendation. In summer of 2017 we followed up to see what actions they had taken to implement the recommendation, but we did not receive any updates. GAO will continue to monitor OFPP's actions to address this recommendation.
    Recommendation: To improve oversight of tribal firms' participation in the 8(a) program, the Administrator of SBA should, as the new 8(a) tracking database is being developed, take steps toensure that it has the capability to (1) provide visibility to district offices into all tribal 8(a) firms' activity by tribal entity to ensure compliance with new prohibition to award sole-source 8(a) follow-on contracts to sister subsidiaries; (2) track revenue from tribal 8(a) firms' primary and secondary industry codes to ensure that subsidiaries under the same parent company are not generating the majority of their revenue from the same primary industry; and (3) track information on 8(a) contracts and task or delivery orders,including orders awarded under basic ordering agreements, tohelp ensure that district officials have information necessary toenforce the 8(a) program regulations.

    Agency: Small Business Administration
    Status: Open

    Comments: The Small Business Administration (SBA) neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. In June 2015, SBA officials told GAO that they will use a high risk model of random surveillance to track revenue in primary and secondary codes for entity-owned firms, such as tribal 8(a) firms. SBA will include this as a part of the continuing eligibility process, and will randomly select entity-owned firms and subsidiaries for the deep dive. As part of this effort, SBA will pull data from the Federal Procurement Data System to determine what industry codes the subsidiaries are earning revenues. SBA will look for firms generating revenue in another industry code that exceeds the revenue in their primary industry code when the revenue also aligns under the primary industry code of another subsidiary firm for two consecutive years. These firms will be notified of SBA's concern in writing during their continuing eligibility review to be vigilant to avoid further action by the SBA. In February 2016, SBA informed us that it had delayed plans for the random surveillance, and had taken steps in the interim to begin monitoring the revenue generated under a subsidiary's primary and secondary NAICS codes by tracking award obligations for all entity-owned firms in a spreadsheet. SBA officials told us that the spreadsheet is a stop gap measure until the database can be developed. We asked for updates to steps taken but as of September 2017, no updates were provided. We will continue to track progress on the development of this randomized analysis and other efforts to provide the necessary visibility to all district offices on tribal 8(a) firms participation in the 8(a) program.
    Director: Goldenkoff, Robert N
    Phone: (202)512-3000

    2 open recommendations
    including 1 priority recommendation
    Recommendation: To improve the Bureau's ability to control costs for the 2020 decennial and balance cost and quality, the Secretary of Commerce should direct the Under Secretary of the Economics and Statistics Administration, as well as the Director of the U.S. Census Bureau, to finalize how the Bureau will apply cost as an evaluation criterion for choosing among design alternatives for 2020 and ensure that all criteria are transparent, well documented, and consistently applied before alternatives are eliminated.

    Agency: Department of Commerce
    Status: Open

    Comments: Commerce neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. According to the Census Bureau, each research and testing (R&T) project team was to develop a study plan outlining the goal of the project, the expected outcome, and the methodology to be used to arrive at data to inform trade off analysis and decision-making. To help ensure efficient use of resources for 2020 R&T projects, and that the conclusions reached by the projects were sound and provide decision makers with reliable findings, the Bureau planned to establish internal Scientific and Methodological Review Panels. These panels were to evaluate research designs, provide critical feedback and guidance to the research teams and assess the validity of any findings, conclusions and recommendations. In October 2015 the Bureau released an operational plan that described at a high level how cost was a consideration, but it did not lay out the criteria to be used. As of July 2017, we are following up with Census officials to obtain evidence that cost is being used as an evaluation criterion when choosing among design alternatives.
    Recommendation: GAO previously recommended that the Secretary of Commerce direct the Bureau to establish guidance, policies, and procedures for cost estimation that would meet best practice criteria. To help ensure that the Bureau produces a reliable and high-quality cost estimate for the 2020 Census, the Bureau should finalize guidance, policies, and procedures for cost estimation in accordance with best practices prior to developing the Bureau's initial 2020 life cycle cost estimate.

    Agency: Department of Commerce: Bureau of the Census
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: Commerce neither agreed nor disagreed with this recommendation. In October 2015, the Bureau announced an estimate of its 2020 Census life-cycle cost. In our June 30, 2016 report (GAO-16-628), we assessed the Bureau's guidance, policies, and procedures underlying that estimate. We found that the Bureau's cost estimate partially met the characteristics of two best practices (comprehensive and accurate) described in the GAO Cost Guide and minimally met the other two (well-documented and credible). In addition, best practices state that a risk and uncertainty analysis should be performed to determine the level of risk associated with the cost estimate. The Bureau carried out such an analysis only for a portion of estimated costs for fiscal years 2018 to 2020, covering $4.6 billion. This amounts to about 37 percent of the $12.5 billion total estimated life-cycle cost, and less than one-half of the total estimated cost of the Bureau to comply with best practices for cost estimation. To fully implement this recommendation, the Bureau needs to implement specific controls over its cost estimation process for the 2020 Census, such as guidance that documents who is responsible for what and when, and what information flows where and when. As of July 2017, Bureau officials are currently gathering artifacts to support implementation of this recommendation.
    Director: Williamson, Randall B
    Phone: (202)512-3000

    8 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To help ensure that the military services' requirements for physician credentialing and privileging are consistent across the MHS, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Surgeons General of the military services to establish a DOD-wide process to identify and address existing inconsistencies between DOD's and the military services' physician credentialing and privileging requirements, including those inconsistencies we identified in this report.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To help ensure that the military services' requirements for physician credentialing and privileging are consistent across the MHS, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Surgeons General of the military services to establish a DOD-wide process to coordinate all current and future efforts to revise physician credentialing and privileging requirements.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to coordinate individual MTFs' efforts to establish mechanisms to collect and analyze data to evaluate physician performance and support performance assessments.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to clarify requirements for how MTFs document follow-up on peer recommendations, including who is responsible for documenting follow-up and where that documentation should be filed.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to clarify requirements for the information that physicians need to provide in their curriculum vitae (CV) so that MTFs can identify unaccounted for periods in practice history, as well as how MTFs should document explanations of any unaccounted for periods.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to establish requirements for MTFs to document significant events that occur during the review of a credentials file, including which types of significant events should be documented, who is responsible for documenting significant events, and where that documentation should be filed.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To assure that information on a physician's clinical competence and practice history is documented and available to support credentialing and privileging decisions by Army MTFs, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs and the Army Surgeon General to establish a process to ensure that relevant information from the DPDB is documented in the credentials file.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Recommendation: To assure that MTFs are fully complying with DOD's and the military services' requirements for physician credentialing and privileging and implementing these requirements appropriately, the Secretary of Defense should direct the Surgeons General of the military services to establish and implement an oversight process to conduct reviews of a sample of credentials files to identify and address areas of noncompliance and incomplete documentation.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of July 2017, DOD officials have not implemented this recommendation. GAO considers it to be open. We will update the status of this recommendation when we receive additional information.
    Director: Fleming, Susan A
    Phone: (202)512-4431

    1 open recommendations
    Recommendation: In order to encourage vehicle owners to comply with safety recalls, provide vehicle owners with specific information about whether their vehicle is involved in a recall, and identify factors that affect recall completion rates, among other things, the Secretary of Transportation should direct the Administrator of NHTSA to develop a plan to use the data it collects on recall campaigns to analyze particular patterns or trends that may characterize successful recalls and determine whether these represent best practices that could be used in other recall campaigns.

    Agency: Department of Transportation
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions NHTSA has taken in response to this recommendation will provide updated information.