Reports & Testimonies

  • GAO’s recommendations database contains report recommendations that still need to be addressed.

    GAO’s recommendations help congressional and agency leaders prepare for appropriations and oversight activities, as well as help improve government operations. Recommendations remain open until they are designated as Closed-implemented or Closed-not implemented. You can explore open recommendations by searching or browsing.

    GAO's priority recommendations are those that we believe warrant priority attention. We sent letters to the heads of key departments and agencies, urging them to continue focusing on these issues. These recommendations are labeled as such. You can find priority recommendations by searching or browsing our open recommendations below, or through our mobile app.

  • Browse Open Recommendations

    Explore priority recommendations by subject terms or browse by federal agency

    Search Open Recommendations

    Search for a specific priority recommendation by word or phrase



  • Governing on the go?

    Our Priorities for Policy Makers app makes it easier for leaders to search our recommendations on the go.

    See the November 10th Press Release


  • Have a Question about a Recommendation?

    • For questions about a specific recommendation, contact the person or office listed with the recommendation.
    • For general information about recommendations, contact GAO's Audit Policy and Quality Assurance office at (202) 512-6100 or apqa@gao.gov.
  • « Back to Results List Sort by   

    Results:

    Subject Term: "Federal agency leadership"

    3 publications with a total of 11 open recommendations including 2 priority recommendations
    Director: Seto J. Bagdoyan
    Phone: (202) 512-6722

    4 open recommendations
    Recommendation: The NIST Director should incorporate elements of key practices into the implementation of the Security Sprint action plans, by establishing a comprehensive communication strategy for employees; interim milestone dates; and measures to assess effectiveness. (Recommendation 1)

    Agency: Department of Commerce: National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: The Director of the Office of Security (OSY), in coordination with the NIST Director, should conduct an evaluation of the effectiveness of the current security management structure as compared to a consolidated security structure, centrally managed by OSY, to identify the most effective and feasible approach to physical security at NIST. (Recommendation 2)

    Agency: Department of Commerce: Office of Security
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: The Director of OSY should ensure that the draft Commerce risk management policy is finalized and implemented in accordance with the ISC's RMP Standard, by requiring the following: (1) Use and documentation of a sound risk assessment methodology that assesses the threats, vulnerabilities, and consequences for each of the undesirable events required by the RMP Standard, and use of these three factors to measure risk. (2) Documentation of key risk management decisions, such as justification and tenants' approval for facility security level (FSL) determinations, justification for deviation from baseline levels of risk or protection, as well as risk acceptance and consideration of alternative countermeasures. (3) Establishment of a facility security committee (FSC) at multitenant facilities and campuses, including locations such as the NIST Boulder campus. (4) ISC training for all OSY assessors and the individuals responsible for deciding to implement countermeasures and accepting risk. (Recommendation 3)

    Agency: Department of Commerce: Office of Security
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Recommendation: The NIST Director should finalize and implement risk management policies and procedures, ensuring that they contain a formal coordination mechanism between OSY and NIST and are aligned with Commerce's revised risk management policy, particularly with regard to establishing FSCs. (Recommendation 4)

    Agency: Department of Commerce: National Institute of Standards and Technology
    Status: Open

    Comments: When we confirm what actions the agency has taken in response to this recommendation, we will provide updated information.
    Director: Mihm, J Christopher
    Phone: (202) 512-6806

    4 open recommendations
    Recommendation: To improve performance management staff capacity to support performance management in federal agencies, the Director of OPM, in coordination with the PIC and the Chief Learning Officer (CLO) Council, should work with agencies to identify competency areas needing improvement within agencies.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out to Performance Improvement Council (PIC) and Office of Management and Budget staff in November 2016 and February 2017 for an update on the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response. In May 2016, the PIC had reported that it has an ongoing series of survey and focus group work that includes some issues related to learning needs, but that they do not address competency areas directly as the PIC community does not find this framework useful.
    Recommendation: To improve performance management staff capacity to support performance management in federal agencies, the Director of OPM, in coordination with the PIC and the CLO Council, should work with agencies to identify agency training that focuses on needed performance management competencies.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out to Performance Improvement Council (PIC) and Office of Management and Budget staff in November 2016 and February 2017 for an update on the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response. In May 2016, the PIC had reported that it had created and was piloting performance training to test the best way to make this training available to a broad audience. Previously, the PIC had planned to use a website, LearnPerformance.gov, to make courses on performance management competencies available. According to the PIC, the website had been taken down and there is ongoing discussion about what to do in its place.
    Recommendation: To improve performance management staff capacity to support performance management in federal agencies, the Director of OPM, in coordination with the PIC and the CLO Council, should work with agencies to share information about available agency training on competency areas needing improvement.

    Agency: Office of Personnel Management
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out to Performance Improvement Council (PIC) and Office of Management and Budget staff in November 2016 and February 2017 for an update on the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response. In May 2016, the PIC had reported that it had created and was piloting performance training to test the best way to make this training available to a broad audience. Previously, the PIC had planned to use a website, LearnPerformance.gov, to make courses on performance management competencies available. According to the PIC, the website had been taken down and there is ongoing discussion about what to do in its place.
    Recommendation: To ensure that the PIC has a clear plan for accomplishing its goals and evaluating its progress, the Director of OMB should work with the PIC to update its strategic plan and review the PIC's goals, measures, and strategies for achieving performance, and revise them if appropriate.

    Agency: Executive Office of the President: Office of Management and Budget
    Status: Open

    Comments: GAO reached out in November 2016 and February 2017 to staff at the Office of Management and Budget and Performance Improvement Council regarding the status of this recommendation, but has not received a response.
    Director: Williamson, Randall B
    Phone: (206)287-4860

    3 open recommendations
    including 2 priority recommendations
    Recommendation: To ensure that servicemembers have equitable access to the military services' wounded warrior programs, including the RCP, and to establish central accountability for these programs, the Secretary of Defense should establish or designate an office to centrally oversee and monitor the activities of the military services' wounded warrior programs to include the following: (1) Develop consistent eligibility criteria to ensure that similarly situated recovering servicemembers from different military services have uniform access to these programs; (2) Direct the military services' wounded warrior programs to fully comply with the policies governing care coordination and case management programs and any future changes to these policies; (3) Develop a common mechanism to systematically monitor the performance of the wounded warrior programs--to include the establishment of common terms and definitions--and report this information on a biannual basis to the Armed Services Committees of the House of Representatives and the Senate.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: DOD did not concur with our part (1) of our recommendation to develop consistent eligibility criteria, explaining that the three military department secretaries should have the ability to control entrance criteria into their wounded warrior programs and that varying eligibility criteria have not resulted in noticeable differences in access to these programs by recovering servicemembers or their families. In attachments to a memo dated April 8, 2014, DOD provided an update on progress made to implement parts (2) and (3) of the DOD-specific recommendation made in GAO-13-5. Regarding part (2), DOD reported that budget constraints had delayed its plan to conduct oversight visits to 63 service sites over a 12-month period to ensure that military wounded warrior programs were operating in compliance with DOD Recovery Coordinator Program policy. DOD stated that the Warrior Care Policy office, in coordination with the military service branches, had intended to begin these oversight visits and interviews in September 2013; that as of March 2014, five sites had been reviewed; and that results of the compliance visits would be available upon completion. Regarding part (3) of the recommendation, DOD's memo stated that DOD and VA continue work on developing policies on clinical and non-clinical care coordination. It also noted that interagency metrics for monitoring complex care coordination performance were under development by the DOD/VA Interagency Care Coordination Committee. Further, DOD stated that because the Joint Executive Council publishes an annual report, that reporting the progress in developing common terms and definitions used by wounded warrior programs to congressional committees would be of limited value. As of October 2016, when we determine what additional steps the agency has taken to implement this recommendation, we will update this information.
    Recommendation: To ensure that persistent challenges with care coordination, disability evaluation, and the electronic sharing of health records are fully resolved, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs should ensure that these issues receive sustained leadership attention and collaboration at the highest levels with a singular focus on what is best for the individual servicemember or veteran to ensure continuity of care and a seamless transition from DOD to VA. This should include holding the Joint Executive Council accountable for (1) ensuring that key issues affecting recovering servicemembers and veterans get sufficient consideration, including recommendations made by the Warrior Care and Coordination Task Force and the Recovering Warrior Task Force; (2) developing mechanisms for making joint policy decisions; (3) involving the appropriate decision-makers for timely implementation of policy; and; (4) establishing mechanisms to systematically oversee joint initiatives and ensure that outcomes and goals are identified and achieved.

    Agency: Department of Defense
    Status: Open
    Priority recommendation

    Comments: As of October 2016, under the joint DOD/VA Interagency Care Coordination Committee, the departments have made progress to improve nonclinical care coordination procedures, primarily through the development of two initiatives?the Lead Coordinator initiative (in which a single care coordinator serves as the primary point of contact for a recovering servicemember) and through the use of a single, interagency care plan (ICP) for each recovering servicemember. As of March 2016, the departments were continuing the national rollout of the Lead Coordinator initiative and had trained nearly 3,700 DOD and VA personnel on the new process. In addition, DOD and VA continued the development of the ICP initiative, which will depend upon their ability to electronically exchange the information needed to implement servicemembers' care plans. In December 2015, DOD awarded a contract to support the ICP and to create electronic interoperability with VA. The departments anticipate testing their ability to exchange information digitally in June 2016 and achieving full operational capability by September 2016. We will continue to monitor progress to implement the joint Lead Coordinator and the ICP care coordination initiatives.
    Recommendation: To ensure that persistent challenges with care coordination, disability evaluation, and the electronic sharing of health records are fully resolved, the Secretaries of Defense and Veterans Affairs should ensure that these issues receive sustained leadership attention and collaboration at the highest levels with a singular focus on what is best for the individual servicemember or veteran to ensure continuity of care and a seamless transition from DOD to VA. This should include holding the Joint Executive Council accountable for (1) ensuring that key issues affecting recovering servicemembers and veterans get sufficient consideration, including recommendations made by the Warrior Care and Coordination Task Force and the Recovering Warrior Task Force; (2) developing mechanisms for making joint policy decisions; (3) involving the appropriate decision-makers for timely implementation of policy; and; (4) establishing mechanisms to systematically oversee joint initiatives and ensure that outcomes and goals are identified and achieved.

    Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
    Status: Open

    Comments: As of October 2016, under the joint DOD/VA Interagency Care Coordination Committee, the departments have made progress to improve nonclinical care coordination procedures, primarily through the development of two initiatives?the Lead Coordinator initiative (in which a single care coordinator serves as the primary point of contact for a recovering servicemember) and through the use of a single, interagency care plan (ICP) for each recovering servicemember. As of March 2016, the departments were continuing the national rollout of the Lead Coordinator initiative and had trained nearly 3,700 DOD and VA personnel on the new process. In addition, DOD and VA continued the development of the ICP initiative, which will depend upon their ability to electronically exchange the information needed to implement servicemembers' care plans. In December 2015, DOD awarded a contract to support the ICP and to create electronic interoperability with VA. The departments anticipate testing their ability to exchange information digitally in June 2016 and achieving full operational capability by September 2016. We will continue to monitor progress to implement the joint Lead Coordinator and the ICP care coordination initiatives.