Skip to main content

Superfund: More Emphasis Needed on Risk Reduction

T-RCED-96-168 Published: May 08, 1996. Publicly Released: May 08, 1996.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the Superfund Program's effectiveness. GAO noted that: (1) the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has not adequately emphasized risk reduction in site selection or cleanup schedules; (2) EPA regional offices have used other factors besides risk reduction to select sites or prioritize cleanups; (3) EPA has too often inappropriately assumed that contaminated sites' future uses will include residential purposes, which substantially increases cleanup costs; (4) Superfund costs could be reduced by as much as $1.7 billion over the program's life if EPA used its less costly accelerated cleanup procedures; (5) health hazards would also be reduced with accelerated procedures; (6) statutory cost and time limitations on removal actions and an inflexible funding arrangement limit EPA use of non-time-critical removals; and (7) in 1995, EPA initiated procedural and organizational changes to include better risk and land-use assessments and community involvement in the program, but it is too soon to tell if the changes will result in permanent program improvements.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Cost controlEnvironmental engineeringEnvironmental monitoringHazardous substancesHealth hazardsPollution controlSite selectionWaste disposalHazardous waste sitesHazardous waste site remediation