Non-Time-Critical Removals as a Tool for Faster and Less Costly Cleanups

T-RCED-96-137: Published: Apr 17, 1996. Publicly Released: Apr 17, 1996.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) use of non-time-critical removals for hazardous waste cleanups, focusing on: (1) the advantages and disadvantages of non-time-critical removals; (2) the potential use of non-time-critical removals in Superfund cleanups; and (3) factors that inhibit the use of non-time-critical removals. GAO noted that: (1) on average the use of non-time-critical removals could expedite environmental cleanups by 2 years and reduce costs by about $500,000 over similar cleanup actions using the remedial removal process; (2) non-time-critical removals are successful because they have a streamlined planning process; (3) non-time-critical removals would require EPA to spend more time overseeing cleanup contracts and shift costs from states to EPA; (4) non-time-critical removals are a potentially useful tool in cleaning up portions of most of the 3,000 sites in the EPA Superfund inventory; (5) non-time-critical removals have not been used for a wide variety of cleanups because most Superfund funding has been spent on emergency removals; (6) additional factors that have limited non-time-critical removal use include EPA inability to shift funds between accounts and regions, and statutory limits on the duration and cost of non-time-critical removals; and (7) the proposed Superfund reauthorization legislation would ease the statutory limitations on non-time-critical removals.

Apr 29, 2016

Apr 25, 2016

Mar 28, 2016

Mar 11, 2016

Feb 22, 2016

Feb 11, 2016

Jan 27, 2016

Jan 14, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here