Skip to main content

Energy Management: High Risk Area Requires Fundamental Change

T-RCED-93-7 Published: Feb 17, 1993. Publicly Released: Feb 17, 1993.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the Department of Energy's (DOE) contract management. GAO noted that: (1) DOE vulnerability to waste, fraud, abuse, and mismanagement stems from long-standing inadequacies in oversight of contractors' operations and activities; (2) weak contractor oversight significantly affected DOE ability to control costs; (3) DOE spent $1.6 billion to provide managers and staff with information to assist them in accomplishing their missions, but did not have management and financial information essential for effective contract management; (4) DOE did not provide objective criteria for award or management fees paid to contractors and sometimes rewarded contractors for questionable performance; (5) continued use of nonstandard contract clauses limited DOE control; (6) contracting weaknesses have contributed to significant environmental, safety, and health problems at DOE nuclear weapons plants; (7) DOE is changing its contracting practices to address material weaknesses by incorporating a new accountability rule into its contracts with profit-making organizations, deleting nonstandard contract clauses, denying award fees if contractor performance is unacceptable, and increasing field staff and contract oversight; and (8) with new contract terms and conditions, DOE hopes to make its contracting relationships more consistent with the government's interests.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

AccountabilityContract administrationContract oversightContract performanceContractor paymentsContractor violationsCost controlCost plus award fee contractsFraudGOCOManagement and operating contracts