Skip to main content

Lapse in Appropriations

Please note that a lapse in appropriations has caused GAO to shut down its operations. Therefore, GAO will not be able to publish reports or otherwise update this website until GAO resumes operations. In addition, the vast majority of GAO personnel are not permitted to work. Consequently, calls or emails to agency personnel may not be returned until GAO resumes operations. For details on how the bid protest process will be handled during the shutdown, please see the legal decisions page. For information related to the GAO Personnel Appeals Board (PAB), please see the PAB webpage.

NSF Review: Review Process for the National Science Foundation's Science and Engineering Pipeline Study

T-RCED-92-24 Published: Apr 08, 1992. Publicly Released: Apr 08, 1992.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the National Science Foundation's (NSF) Science and Engineering Pipeline Study, focusing on: (1) how NSF reviewed the study; and (2) information that NSF provided in a September 1991 letter to a congressional subcommittee on its study review process. GAO noted that: (1) in 1984, the White House requested the study to analyze the demand-supply balance for scientists and engineers; (2) although several levels of NSF officials approved the study and followed existing NSF procedures for internally reviewing the study, an NSF letter regarding its review of the study may have conveyed the impression that NSF provided a more formal external review of the study than GAO was able to identify; (3) although the NSF letter stated that nine NSF officials reviewed the study, eight did not conduct a formal review of the study, and the ninth official did not remember reviewing the study; (4) NSF stated that they use the word review to mean professional interaction which includes discussions within the professional community on study-related concepts and topics; and (5) the study appears to have received little or no formal review from persons outside NSF.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Educational researchEngineersEvaluation methodsInteragency relationsSocial sciences researchEngineeringScientistsEconomic developmentPublicationsFunding shortfall