DOE Management:

Improvements Needed In Oversight of Procurement and Property Management Practices at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory

T-RCED-91-88: Published: Aug 20, 1991. Publicly Released: Aug 20, 1991.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed management issues relating to the University of California's (UC) operation of the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL). GAO noted that: (1) LLNL did not have adequate controls to ensure that property in its custody was safeguarded against theft, unauthorized use, or loss; (2) because control over secret documents in LLNL custody was inadequate and decentralized, LLNL management could not readily ensure that secret information was being effectively managed or controlled; (3) LLNL inappropriately used sole-source purchases, did not comply with Department of Energy (DOE) review and approval requirements, and did not give adequate attention to subcontract costs; (4) LLNL had leased up to 58 passenger vehicles on a sole-source basis from UC, since capital funds were not available to purchase the vehicles and the General Services Administration did not have the types of vehicles required; (5) in several instances, UC overbilled LLNL for vehicles that had been returned to UC or which remained in service at LLNL; (6) LLNL leased vehicles without obtaining DOE authorization; and (7) DOE and LLNL have disagreed on the appropriate vehicle fleet size for at least 5 years, mainly because of inadequate DOE oversight of LLNL purchases and property and the mutuality concept included in certain clauses in the DOE contract with UC. GAO believes that there is a need for substantial improvements in UC laboratory management and DOE oversight of the management effort.

Oct 12, 2017

Oct 11, 2017

Oct 10, 2017

Sep 29, 2017

Sep 28, 2017

Sep 27, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here