Skip to main content

General Accounting Office's View on the Conservation Provisions of the 1990 Farm Bill

T-RCED-90-49 Published: Mar 15, 1990. Publicly Released: Mar 15, 1990.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed its views on: (1) Food Security Act-related soil and water programs; and (2) potential changes Congress might consider for the 1990 farm bill. GAO noted that: (1) soil conservation programs helped reduce the environmental impacts of agricultural production, but the act only applied to about one-third of the 423 million highly erodible acres of U.S. cropland; (2) the Department of Agriculture (USDA) did not take prompt action to address water quality concerns in implementing its Conservation Reserve Program (CRP); (3) USDA developed coordinating mechanisms to oversee its water quality efforts, but did not establish an executive office to oversee its water quality activities; (4) USDA did not develop a comprehensive water quality policy; and (5) federal policy objectives and goals conflicted concerning agricultural chemicals and water and land conservation. GAO also noted that Congress may wish to consider: (1) a requirement to restore converted wetlands and regain farmer eligibility for farm program payments; (2) requiring a penalty for the conversion of fragile lands; (3) allowing continued enrollment in CRP and modifying the 25-percent county cap in areas suffering from water quality problems; (4) improving management of specific act provisions; and (5) legislative changes to encourage the use of alternative agricultural methods to reduce environmental damage.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Agricultural programsEligibility criteriaEnvironmental policiesFarm income stabilization programsFarm produceLand leasesLand managementProposed legislationSoil conservationWater resources conservation