Military Readiness:

Improvements Still Needed in Assessing Military Readiness

T-NSIAD-97-107: Published: Mar 11, 1997. Publicly Released: Mar 11, 1997.

Additional Materials:


Mark E. Gebicke
(202) 512-5140


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

GAO discussed the military readiness assessment process, focusing on what: (1) disconnects are associated with readiness reporting and why they exist; (2) corrective actions have been proposed and taken to measure readiness; and (3) further actions are needed.

GAO noted that: (1) formal readiness reports provided by the Joint Chiefs of Staff's Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS) have sometimes indicated a higher state of readiness than appears warranted based on other information coming from military personnel in the field; (2) the implications are that the formal reporting system is overly optimistic in its readiness assessments, and questions can be legitimately raised about its credibility; (3) as GAO and others have reported, there are many shortcomings in SORTS that need to be addressed, including the: (a) lack of emphasis on readiness on a long-term basis, contrasted with the snapshot in time currently provided; (b) use of insufficient indicators to ensure a comprehensive assessment of readiness; and (c) inability to measure integrated readiness of joint operating forces; and (4) GAO's recommendations have been targeted toward helping the Department of Defense identify indicators most relevant to developing a more comprehensive readiness assessment and ensuring that comparable data are maintained by all services to allow the development of trends on the selected indicators.

Oct 26, 2016

Oct 24, 2016

Oct 20, 2016

Oct 17, 2016

Oct 12, 2016

Sep 26, 2016

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here