Strategic Bombers:

Issues Related to the B-1B Aircraft Program

T-NSIAD-91-11: Published: Mar 6, 1991. Publicly Released: Mar 6, 1991.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

GAO discussed the B-1B bomber, focusing on the lack of: (1) an effective defensive avionics system; (2) a long-term solution to minimize engine blade failures; and (3) an effective anti-icing capability. GAO found that: (1) although the Air Force spent approximately $3.2 billion on the B-1B program, it failed to demonstrate that the system met its reduced specifications; (2) laboratory test results indicated that the defense avionics system would meet current contract specifications with a few exceptions, but flight test data were still being analyzed; (3) new intelligence data identified the capability of a threat radar system the defense avionics system was not designed to counter; (4) the addition of a radar warning receiver would increase the number of threat radar systems the aircraft could detect and an improved antenna would provide increased frequency coverage; (5) between October 1988 and December 1990, five B-1B aircraft experienced engine failures as a result of broken engine blades; (6) the contractor developed and installed thicker and stronger retainer rings to replace the deficient ones found during engine blade tests; (7) the Air Force established an independent review team to assess potential solutions to the engine blade problem; (8) as of November 1989, 109 B-1B engines were damaged by ice, costing $1.6 million and requiring 4,327 hours to repair; (9) an estimated 15 percent of planned training flights were cancelled due to icing and weather problems; and (10) unofficial cost estimates indicated that resolution of in-flight and on-ground icing problems would cost about $200 million.

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 19, 2016

Sep 12, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Sep 6, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here