Statistical Agencies:

Consolidation and Quality Issues

T-GGD-97-78: Published: Apr 9, 1997. Publicly Released: Apr 9, 1997.

Contact:

L. Nye Stevens
(202) 512-2637
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the federal statistical system, focusing on: (1) the quality of federal statistics; (2) how the federal statistical system's decentralized structure affects statistical quality; (3) whether consolidating the statistical functions currently housed in the Department of Commerce with those of other federal agencies could provide a more streamlined and effective federal statistical system; and (4) whether or not the Bureau of the Census and the Bureau of Economic Analysis benefit from being housed in the Department of Commerce.

GAO noted that: (1) while the principal statistical agencies GAO has reviewed have generally adhered to applicable professional standards, there are reasons to be concerned about the quality of statistical data; (2) public and private sector experts have said that the current system needs a more coherent approach to measurement of investment, productivity, and services; (3) measurement problems, such as those concerning consumer prices, can affect budget and economic policymaking; (4) GAO's work has also demonstrated a deterioration in the quality of the decennial census, which GAO designated as a high-risk area in February 1997; (5) although GAO's work does not indicate the extent to which the decentralized structure is a major cause of the quality problems, it does show that the decentralization contributes largely to other problems, such as inefficiency, the lack of national priorities for allocation of resources, burden on data users and providers, and restrictions on the exchange of data among statistical agencies; (6) for example, in part because of the inability to share data, both Census and the Bureau of Labor Statistics have compiled and maintained their own lists of businesses; (7) GAO has compared the dispersed U.S. system with Canada's centralized system; (8) the head of Statistics Canada has a higher level position than that of the U.S. Chief Statistician, can set and change priorities and shift resources easily, has access to all of the government's administrative records, and can share survey data internally under strict and uniform privacy requirements; (9) potential disadvantages associated with consolidation would include possibly diminished responsiveness to the needs of former parent departments and possible objections to the concentration of data in a single agency; (10) Commerce historically has not been managed on the basis of a unifying mission or shared goals and has decentralized its key administrative functions; and (11) while the Commerce relationship is not meaningless, GAO is not aware of any reasons that would prevent Census and the Bureau of Economic Analysis from performing their missions as part of another department.

Jul 29, 2014

Jul 18, 2014

Jun 23, 2014

Jun 17, 2014

Jun 12, 2014

Jun 10, 2014

May 28, 2014

Mar 27, 2014

Mar 6, 2014

Looking for more? Browse all our products here