Skip to main content

International Trade: U.S. Efforts to Counter Competitors' Tied Aid Practices

T-GGD-95-128 Published: Mar 28, 1995. Publicly Released: Mar 28, 1995.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

GAO discussed the tied aid practices of the United States and its major competitors, focusing on the: (1) adverse effects of foreign tied aid programs on U.S. exports; and (2) effectiveness of U.S. efforts to mitigate these potential adverse effects. GAO noted that: (1) foreign competitors' tied aid practices can cause trade distortions, adversely affect economic development policy decisions, and put U.S. exporters at a competitive disadvantage; (2) the United States may have lost up to $1.8 billion per year because of U.S. competitors' tied aid practices between 1988 and 1991; (3) the greatest impact of competitors' tied aid practices on the United States involves losses in potential long-term business opportunities and reduced access to certain overseas markets; (4) U.S. trade policy has generally opposed tied aid and dissuaded U.S. competitors from using it; (5) the United States has negotiated multilateral agreements within the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development to restrict the use of tied aid and established a Tied Aid Capital Projects Fund so that the Export-Import Bank can counter tied and untied aid that could be harmful to U.S. interests; and (6) although U.S. efforts seem to have reduced competitors' tied aid practices, these efforts have not been in effect long enough for an adequate analytical assessment of their impact.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Developing countriesEconomic developmentExportingForeign economic assistanceForeign governmentsForeign trade agreementsForeign trade policiesInternational economic relationsInternational tradeTrade regulation