Federal Retirement Issues

T-GGD-95-111: Published: Mar 10, 1995. Publicly Released: Mar 10, 1995.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed how federal employee retirement benefits compare with those of congressional members and staff and nonfederal retirement plans. GAO noted that: (1) members of Congress can retire at younger ages and with less service than federal and congressional employees under the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS); (2) the CSRS formula for calculating members' and congressional employees' benefits is more generous than the formula applicable to general federal employees; (3) under CSRS, congressional members and staff must contribute a higher percentage of their salary than general employees; (4) congressional advantages have continued under the Federal Employees Retirement System (FERS), although member provisions are now more similar to those for law enforcement, firefighter, and air traffic control personnel; (5) in the past, few private pension plans required employee contributions, because these nonfederal plans gave lesser benefits to employees who retired before age 60; (6) when combined with Social Security benefits, nonfederal plans give more generous benefits to those who retire at age 62; and (7) there is no indication that nonfederal plans have changed relative to FERS.

Sep 14, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

May 5, 2016

Apr 13, 2016

Apr 4, 2016

Mar 1, 2016

Oct 29, 2015

Oct 27, 2015

  • retirement icon, source: PhotoDisc

    Social Security's Future:

    Answers to Key Questions
    GAO-16-75SP: Published: Oct 27, 2015. Publicly Released: Oct 27, 2015.

Sep 30, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here