What the President's Proposal Does and Does Not Do
T-AIMD/HEHS-99-76: Published: Feb 9, 1999. Publicly Released: Feb 9, 1999.
- Full Report:
Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO discussed the President's proposal for addressing Social Security and use of the budget surplus.
GAO noted that: (1) the President's proposal: (a) reduces debt held by the public from current levels, thereby also reducing net interest costs, raising national saving, and contributing to future economic growth; (b) fundamentally changes Social Security financing by promising general funds in the future by trading publicly held debt for debt held by the Social Security Trust Fund and by investing some of the trust fund in equities with the goal of capturing higher returns over the long term; (c) does not have any effect on the projected cash flow imbalance in the Social Security program's taxes and benefits; and (d) does not represent a Social Security reform plan; (2) budget surpluses provide a valuable opportunity to capture significant long term gains to both improve the nation's capacity to address the looming fiscal challenges arising from demographic change and aid in the transition to a more sustainable Social Security program; (3) the President's proposal offers a valuable opportunity to address both how much of the current resources the nation wants to save for the future and how it can best do so; (4) a substantial share of the surpluses would be used to reduce publicly held debt, providing demonstrable gains for the nation's economic capacity to afford future commitments; (5) in this way, the proposal would help prefund these commitments by using today's wealth earned by current workers to enhance the resources for the next generations; (6) however, the President's proposal does not include any Social Security program reforms to make the program's commitments more affordable; (7) the transfer of surplus resources to the trust fund, which the administration argues is necessary to lock in surpluses for the future, would nonetheless constitute a major shift in financing for the Social Security program; (8) moreover, the proposed transfer may very well make it more difficult for the public to understand and support the savings goals articulated; (9) several other nations have shown how debt reduction itself can be made to be publicly compelling, but only Congress can decide whether such an approach will work in the United States; (10) GAO is concerned that enhancing the financial condition of the trust fund alone without any comprehensive and meaningful Social Security reforms may in fact undermine the case for fundamental program changes; and (11) explicitly pledging federal general revenues to Social Security will limit the options for dealing with other national issues.