Telecommunications:

The Changing Status of Competition to Cable Television

RCED-99-158: Published: Jul 8, 1999. Publicly Released: Jul 14, 1999.

Contact:

Judy A. England Joseph
(202) 512-7631
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on: (1) the status of competition in the subscription television market; (2) the extent to which ownership ties between cable companies and program suppliers may be affecting the development of competition; and (3) key factors that may influence the development of competition in the future.

GAO noted that: (1) the cable industry maintains a high share of the subscription television market nationally and is not very competitive; (2) however, the satellite industry competes against cable companies throughout the United States, and its market share has increased considerably since the introduction of a new generation of satellite television service, known as direct broadcast satellite (DBS) service, in 1994; (3) satellite's share of customers purchasing subscription television service grew from 4 percent in 1994 to 12 percent by mid-1998; (4) during that same period, the market share of the cable industry declined from 93 percent to 85 percent; (5) despite expectations of rapid entry into the subscription television market, telephone companies have progressed more slowly and are providing only limited competition to cable; (6) competitors to incumbent cable companies are pursuing strategies to compete more effectively through pricing, the number of channels offered, and customer service; (7) partly in response to competition, cable companies are upgrading their systems, improving service, and introducing new services, such as Internet access; (8) these behaviors by both incumbent cable companies and other providers may indicate that the market is becoming more competitive despite the continued high market share held by the cable industry; (9) however, some of these behaviors may have occurred even in the absence of increased competition from other subscription television providers; (10) while many cable companies provide television programming throughout the United States, the four largest cable companies as of June 1998 accounted for 55 percent of all television subscribers; (11) the six largest cable companies at that time had significant ownership interests in program suppliers (that is, owners of subscription channels); (12) most cable companies are following strategies to cluster their operations geographically so that they operate most of the cable systems in a particular city or region; (13) these companies realize benefits from their size, ownership interests, and clustering; (14) some industry participants have expressed concerns about competitive advantages that the ownership relationships may create for incumbent cable companies; and (15) the likely future development of competition in the subscription television market is difficult to predict, but certainly several key factors will influence it.

Mar 10, 2014

Jan 6, 2014

May 23, 2013

May 22, 2013

May 21, 2013

Apr 24, 2013

Apr 18, 2013

Feb 28, 2013

Feb 22, 2013

Jan 29, 2013

Looking for more? Browse all our products here