Superfund:

Response to EPA's Letter Concerning Recent GAO Reports

RCED-98-55R: Published: Jan 28, 1998. Publicly Released: Jan 28, 1998.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Peter F. Guerrero
(202) 512-4907
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

GAO responded to a letter from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) questioning the methodology and conclusions of GAO's March 1997 and September 1997 reports on EPA's Superfund cleanup efforts.

GAO noted that: (1) in the March 1997 report on the time it has taken to complete the assessment and cleanup of Superfund sites, which was based on EPA's own data, GAO measured the time: (a) from EPA's discovery of the hazardous waste sites to their listing on Superfund's National Priorities list; and (b) from the sites' listing to the completion of cleanups; (2) the report points out that the assessment and cleanup times for completed sites have generally increased over the life of the program; (3) EPA's letter challenged the methodology GAO used and said that GAO's report was inconsistent with earlier reports; (4) EPA also said that GAO's methodology was mathematically programmed to result in increasing cleanup timeframes over a period of years, involved only a brief period of observations, and was inconsistent with a methodology GAO used for measuring the duration of the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) drug approval process; (5) GAO's methodology shows increasing cleanup times because these times have, in fact, increased, GAO's report accounts for the most recent 11-year period for which data were available, and GAO used a different methodology for measuring the duration of FDA's process because FDA's process was much shorter than EPA's; (6) GAO's September 1997 report on spending trends for the cleanup of Superfund sites analyzes the program's expenditures in fiscal years 1987-1996 to determine, among other things, how much of Superfund's total spending was for cleanup work performed by contractors, in contrast with other activities; (7) EPA's letter asserts that GAO's September report understated cleanup costs, which it said were over 70 percent of the federal Superfund budget; (8) however, GAO's objective was to provide information on costs going to the cleanup contractors who implement Superfund site cleanups; (9) EPA's letter also asserts that the information in GAO's report, in particular the percentage of Superfund spending going to contractor cleanup work, is inconsistent with a September 1994 GAO report; and (10) both GAO reports used the same five categories to provide a breakdown of Superfund costs and both state that the total spending going to contractor cleanup is less than 50 percent.

Sep 15, 2014

Sep 12, 2014

Sep 9, 2014

Aug 11, 2014

Jul 28, 2014

Jul 16, 2014

Jul 15, 2014

Jul 9, 2014

Jun 30, 2014

Jun 16, 2014

Looking for more? Browse all our products here