Food Assistance:

Potential Impacts of Alternative Systems for Delivering Food Stamp Program Benefits

RCED-95-13: Published: Dec 16, 1994. Publicly Released: Jan 17, 1995.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed how potential alternatives to delivering Food Stamp Program benefits would: (1) affect program administrative costs and program participation; and (2) ensure that program benefits are used for their intended purpose.

GAO found that: (1) although electronic benefits transfer (EBT) and cash-out alternatives have the potential to reduce but not totally eliminate fraud, waste, abuse in the Food Stamp program; (2) neither of the alternatives will reduce benefit overpayments that result from the benefits eligibility determination process; (3) the EBT system will be more costly than the current coupon-based system if it is used solely to distribute food stamp benefits; (4) the cash-out system is the least expensive of the alternative benefit delivery systems; (5) demonstration projects have not been able to show that these alternative systems will increase program participation; (6) the EBT system appears to be superior to the coupon and cash-out systems in ensuring that program benefits are used for food purchases; and (7) the EBT system could be more cost-effective if it is used to deliver a wide variety of federal and state assistance programs and restructure the federal welfare system.

Aug 24, 2017

Aug 14, 2017

May 15, 2017

May 11, 2017

Apr 28, 2017

Mar 16, 2017

Feb 13, 2017

Dec 7, 2016

Nov 28, 2016

Nov 17, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here