Advanced Technology:

Proposal Review Process and Treatment of Foreign-Owned Businesses

RCED-94-81: Published: Jan 18, 1994. Publicly Released: Feb 4, 1994.


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the National Institute of Standards and Technology's (NIST) implementation of the Advanced Technology Program (ATP), focusing on: (1) how ATP limits its awards to research and development on precompetitive generic technology; and (2) NIST treatment of foreign-owned businesses that submit proposals for ATP awards.

GAO found that: (1) ATP relies on a consensus decision by its source evaluation board (SEB) to eliminate proposals that do not involve precompetitive generic technology; (2) SEB bases its determination of precompetitive generic content on technical expertise, expert reviewers' comments, and discussions among ATP staff; (3) SEB may eliminate proposals at any time for not including precompetitive generic research; (4) NIST is revising guidance on precompetitive generic technology to clarify the selection criteria used in the proposal review process and the type of research and development ATP supports; and (5) there is no evidence of unfair treatment of foreign-owned businesses that submit ATP proposals for review.

Feb 7, 2014

Dec 20, 2013

Nov 4, 2013

  • science icon, source: National Cancer Institute

    Small Business Innovation Research:

    Data Rights Protections
    GAO-14-116R: Published: Nov 4, 2013. Publicly Released: Nov 4, 2013.

Jul 19, 2013

Apr 10, 2013

Feb 15, 2013

Jun 20, 2012

Jan 24, 2012

Nov 7, 2011

Nov 1, 2011

Looking for more? Browse all our products here