Wheat Support:

The Impact of Target Prices Versus Export Subsidies

RCED-94-79: Published: Jun 7, 1994. Publicly Released: Jun 20, 1994.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed: (1) how the Export Enhancement Program (EEP) has affected the income of wheat producers and grain exporters; (2) whether wheat producers' income would have increased if additional EEP funds had been used for direct income support payments; and (3) the benefits of higher target prices.

GAO found that: (1) EEP has generally increased wheat exports by 3 to 11 percent and raised wheat prices by 0.4 to 12 percent; (2) EEP has increased wheat producers' and marketing firms' income as much as 18 percent; (3) EEP funding can impact the cost of federal commodity programs when it is provided in redeemable certificates rather than in cash; (4) higher target prices would increase producers' net income from wheat production by more than the equivalent level of indirect support through EEP; (5) by increasing market prices, EEP benefits all wheat producers whether or not their wheat acreage is enrolled in the federal wheat commodity program; (6) EEP also discourages foreign competitors from continuing marketing practices that limit access to foreign markets; and (7) increasing exports through EEP would be costly, since the government subsidy on each additional bushel of wheat exported would exceed the farm-level price received for that bushel.

Mar 16, 2017

Feb 13, 2017

Dec 7, 2016

Nov 28, 2016

Nov 17, 2016

Jun 9, 2016

May 26, 2016

May 19, 2016

Apr 14, 2016

Jan 14, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here