Natural Gas:

Costs, Benefits, and Concerns Related to FERC's Order 636

RCED-94-11: Published: Nov 8, 1993. Publicly Released: Nov 8, 1993.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the costs and benefits of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) new order 636 and its potential impact on residential end-users, focusing on: (1) shifts in pipeline customers' fixed costs; (2) pipeline companies' estimated transition costs for implementing the new rule; and (3) the costs and benefits of changes in legislation and FERC regulations to deregulate the natural gas pipeline industry.

GAO found that: (1) although it is estimated that the new rate design will shift about $1.2 billion in fixed costs annually, the actual amount of fixed costs that will be shifted among distribution companies and their end-users cannot be accurately determined until the new order is fully implemented; (2) the changes in rate design could increase residential consumers' gas bills up to 9 percent and decrease nonresidential consumers' bills by 7 percent; (3) the actual cost-shift for the local distributors served by pipeline companies will depend on the pipeline companies' fixed costs, the utilization of pipeline capacity reservations, pipeline companies' efforts to mitigate the cost-shifts, and actions taken by state and local authorities to limit end-user rates; (4) pipeline companies estimate that their transition costs will total $4.8 billion to include the costs of terminating or modifying existing purchase contracts, abandoning obsolete equipment, resolving unpaid balances, and purchasing new equipment; (5) firm-service customers and interruptable-service customers will pay the majority of pipeline companies' transition costs; (6) the new order enables pipeline companies to recover 100 percent of their transition costs; (7) industry analysts believe that the order is needed to continue the increase in efficiency and competition achieved by previous statutory and regulatory initiatives; (8) although FERC estimates that the benefits of the order will significantly exceed its costs, its estimate is questionable because it is based on unreliable sources; and (9) the benefits from the order will depend on how concerns about it are resolved.

Sep 14, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Aug 11, 2016

Aug 9, 2016

Aug 4, 2016

Jul 15, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

Jun 20, 2016

Mar 3, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here