Nuclear Materials:

Nuclear Arsenal Reductions Allow Consideration of Tritium Production Options

RCED-93-189: Published: Aug 17, 1993. Publicly Released: Sep 16, 1993.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Victor S. Rezendes
(202) 512-6082
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the impact of planned reductions in the nation's nuclear arsenal on the Department of Energy's (DOE) tritium strategy, focusing on: (1) the DOE tritium supply; and (2) available alternatives for meeting tritium requirements.

GAO found that: (1) the 5-year tritium reserve and tritium recovered from dismantled nuclear weapons will meet tritium requirements until 2012, however, a new tritium source will be required to service the reduced arsenal and replenish the reserve; (2) the four tritium production alternatives that DOE has considered include three reactor technologies and a particle accelerator which will take 12 to 15 years to design, construct, and begin tritium production; (3) since DOE abandoned its plans to restart its reactor at its Savannah River site, it will use a commercial light-water reactor as an interim source if additional tritium supplies are needed; (4) DOE does not have an agreement with any utility to use its reactor for tritium production; and (5) other possible tritium sources include DOE test and research reactors, foreign countries, and detritiated heavy-water.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: As recommended, DOE reexamined the DOE tritium contingency planning strategy and issued a classified report iterating DOE's current strategy. DOE also reexained the need for a tritium reserve as part of the classified Nuclear Weapons Stockpile Memorandum process.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Energy should reexamine the DOE tritium strategy with emphasis on contingency planning until a new production source is available. DOE should examine all potential tritium source alternatives, and its goal should be to utilize the most economic and appropriate means for providing a tritium contingency in the short term and midterm if tritium demand increases. In view of its implications for the size of and timing for a new tritium production source, the Secretary should also examine the role and need for the tritium reserve.

    Agency Affected: Department of Energy

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 14, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Aug 11, 2016

Aug 9, 2016

Aug 4, 2016

Jul 15, 2016

Jul 14, 2016

Jun 20, 2016

Mar 3, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here