DOE Management:

Consistent Cleanup Indemnification Policy Is Needed

RCED-93-167: Published: Jul 12, 1993. Publicly Released: Sep 8, 1993.

Contact:

Victor S. Rezendes
(202) 512-6082
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO evaluated the Department of Energy's (DOE) approach for indemnifying its contractors against liabilities that could arise from the cleanup of the nation's nuclear weapons complex.

GAO found that: (1) under the cost reimbursement approach, DOE reimburses its contractors for all allowable costs, including environmental costs, incurred in contract performance; (2) under the accountability rule, contractors are reimbursed for all allowable costs, but are liable for avoidable costs; (3) as required by the Price-Anderson Act, the government provides indemnification protection from nuclear incidents or nuclear waste activities to all DOE contractors without regard to who caused the incident; (4) the National Defense Contracts Act authorizes DOE to provide extraordinary contract relief if a contractor's activities are necessary to facilitate the national defense; (5) special provisions that modify standard DOE or federal contract clauses may be the result of previous agreements or other negotiations with the contractors and can define or expand the government's liability; (6) DOE determines what approach to use for indemnifying its cleanup contractors on an individual basis; (7) DOE is aware of the problems with the use of nonstandard clauses and plans to negotiate contracts that include as many standard clauses as possible; (8) the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is responsible for developing indemnification guidelines; and (9) EPA intends to offer indemnification only if it does not receive a sufficient number of qualified bids and the lack of response can be linked to the absence of indemnification.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: To ensure that DOE consistently indemnifies its cleanup contractors, the Secretary of Energy should develop a consistent environmental indemnification policy to be applied to the DOE cleanup sites. This policy should reflect existing statutory requirements, including section 119, and apply the principles contained in EPA guidelines, including: (1) restricting indemnification to those contracts where it is proven to be needed; (2) setting time and payment limits on the government's liabilities if DOE analysis indicates that EPA limits for Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act section 119 are not appropriate; and (3) requiring contractors to be responsible for some portion of the costs that arise from lawsuits for injury or damage caused by their negligence during cleanup activities.

    Agency Affected: Department of Energy

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: DOE's Contract Reform Team issued its report on contract reforms in February 1994. That report includes action items on indemnification that will address some of the components of GAO's recommendations. In December 1994, DOE decided to include all liability issues in the Department of Energy Acquisition Regulations (DEAR). Contracts being renegotiated, renewed, or awarded are including a provision for contractors to use commercial insurance whenever it is available at a reasonable cost. In addition, DEAR is being updated and is in draft NPRM stage. These are all of the steps DOE believes it can reasonably pursue to address this issue.

    Apr 14, 2014

    Dec 17, 2013

    Nov 25, 2013

    Oct 17, 2013

    Sep 23, 2013

    Sep 11, 2013

    Jul 24, 2013

    Jul 10, 2013

    Jun 28, 2013

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here