Skip to main content

Hazardous Waste: Impediments Delay Timely Closing and Cleanup of Facilities

RCED-92-84 Published: Apr 10, 1992. Publicly Released: May 28, 1992.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) inspection of closing land disposal facilities, focusing on the: (1) enforcement actions taken against facilities found in violation of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA); and (2) factors delaying the proper closing of those facilities.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Environmental Protection Agency The Administrator, EPA, should direct EPA regions and the states to obtain and maintain data on the status of closing land disposal facilities' groundwater monitoring systems and on barriers delaying or preventing their installation, as well as develop a plan to address those barriers in a timely fashion so that closure can be completed.
Closed – Not Implemented
EPA has directed its regions and the states to address all RCRA hazardous waste facilities, on a worst facility first basis, not only just closing land disposal facilities. EPA has also directed its regions and the states to emphasize actual cleanup over studies and assessments at facility sites. A GAO follow-up review is considering these issues again.
Environmental Protection Agency The Administrator, EPA, should direct EPA regions and the states to give a higher priority to closing land disposal facilities by annually conducting compliance inspections at those facilities, thereby ensuring that facilities do not have any violations that would significantly delay or prevent closure.
Closed – Not Implemented
While EPA agrees that inspections at closing facilities are important and has made inspections a national priority in its FY 1993 program plans, EPA has stated that it is not practical to require more inspections than once every 2 years, as mandated by law.
Environmental Protection Agency The Administrator, EPA, should direct EPA regions and the states to reinstate the requirement that groundwater monitoring inspections be conducted at least every 3 years at closing land disposal facilities once basic monitoring systems are installed to ensure that the systems are capable of providing necessary and basic information on the extent to which those facilities pose a threat to human health and the environment and require cleanup.
Closed – Implemented
EPA has reinstated the requirement that these inspections be conducted every 3 years in its FY 1993 program plans.
Environmental Protection Agency The Administrator, EPA, should establish time frames for settling disagreements with owners/operators after enforcement orders are issued, and when such disagreements cannot be resolved and orders are appealed, evaluate the feasibility of establishing time frames for administrative hearings and for obtaining decisions in those hearings.
Closed – Not Implemented
EPA has not instituted time frames on a national basis because of the caseload carried by EPA's seven administrative law judges.
Environmental Protection Agency The Administrator, EPA, should develop guidance regarding when: (1) facilities should be allowed to attempt waste removal and how long those attempts should continue before facilities are instructed to revise their closure plans to close with waste in place; and (2) regions and states should request post-closure permit applications.
Closed – Not Implemented
Although EPA agrees that facilities should not be allowed to postpone closure by pretending to remove waste, it does not believe it can develop meaningful guidance. In its FY 1993 operating plans, EPA has provided guidance on when regions and states should request in postclosure permit applications.
Environmental Protection Agency The Administrator, EPA, should develop and implement a plan that: (1) identifies those closing land disposal facilities not making reasonable progress toward properly closing and unlikely to comply with RCRA requirements; (2) determines who will install necessary groundwater monitoring systems and when they will be installed to provide basic information on the nature and extent of groundwater contamination; and (3) determines the best options for controlling and cleaning up, in a reasonable time, those facilities that pose the greatest threat.
Closed – Not Implemented
EPA has outlined a strategy to address all RCRA hazardous waste facilities on a worst-facility-first basis, not just closing land disposal facilities. EPA has asked its regions to submit a strategy to address closing land disposal facilities that either rank high or are unranked for environmental priority. A GAO follow-up review is addressing these issues again.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Environmental lawEnvironmental monitoringFacility managementstate relationsHazardous substancesInspectionLaw enforcementPollution controlRegulatory agenciesWaste managementGroundwater