Nuclear Health and Safety:

More Can Be Done to Better Control Environmental Restoration Costs

RCED-92-71: Published: Apr 20, 1992. Publicly Released: Jun 4, 1992.

Contact:

Victor S. Rezendes
(202) 512-6082
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the: (1) degree of cost growth associated with the Department of Energy's (DOE) environmental restoration program; and (2) steps DOE can take to better manage and control cost growth.

GAO found that: (1) since DOE has not updated or revised its 1988 total cost estimate for completing all environmental restoration work, GAO could not determine the aggregate cost growth associated with the environmental restoration program; (2) a comparison of DOE 5-year plans shows a 48-percent increase over the past 2 years in estimated funds necessary for fiscal years 1991 through 1995; (3) a detailed cost history for certain subprograms shows that between 1988 and 1991, overall estimated costs increased 61 percent; (4) DOE lacks such important management tools as comprehensive performance baselines for individual projects, a process for consistently estimating project costs, an information system capable of monitoring project-specific cost growth, and a system for sharing lessons-learned information; and (5) to better control cost growth, DOE has implemented initiatives to conduct program cost reviews, develop procedures that require preparing documentation to support cost estimates, and institute cost estimating review procedures.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendations for Executive Action

    Recommendation: To improve the management of the environmental restoration program and better control cost growth, the Secretary of Energy should complete baselining of the environmental restoration program as soon as possible and monitor this baseline to ensure that changes made are in accordance with departmental guidance.

    Agency Affected: Department of Energy

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: DOE completed baseline development and validation in June 1992.

    Recommendation: To improve the management of the environmental restoration program and better control cost growth, the Secretary of Energy should develop guidance specifying a consistent cost estimating process to be used throughout DOE and assess annually which environmental restoration projects should receive check estimates.

    Agency Affected: Department of Energy

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: DOE has developed a consistent cost estimating process and has committed to validating cost estimates annually.

    Recommendation: To improve the management of the environmental restoration program and better control cost growth, the Secretary of Energy should establish a reliable management information system that will monitor the degree of and the reasons for environmental restoration cost growth and resolve any incompatibility between this system and individual information systems being developed by DOE field offices.

    Agency Affected: Department of Energy

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: DOE has developed a progress tracking system to track actual cost and schedules versus planned cost and milestones.

    Recommendation: To improve the management of the environmental restoration program and better control cost growth, the Secretary of Energy should, once the lessons-learned environmental restoration information system is developed, monitor its use to ensure that bad as well as good experiences are entered into the system and that mistakes are not repeated because the system is not used.

    Agency Affected: Department of Energy

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: A DOE process improvement team developed a DOE lessons-learned standard in May 1995 that all DOE organizational programs must comply with in establishing their individual lessons-learned programs.

    Aug 11, 2014

    Jul 17, 2014

    Jul 11, 2014

    Jun 23, 2014

    Jun 9, 2014

    Jun 5, 2014

    May 30, 2014

    May 16, 2014

    May 15, 2014

    May 7, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here