Pesticides:

Better Data Can Improve the Usefulness of EPA's Benefit Assessments

RCED-92-32: Published: Dec 31, 1991. Publicly Released: Jan 30, 1992.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Peter F. Guerrero
(202) 512-4907
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO evaluated the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) benefit assessments of pesticides used on food, focusing on: (1) EPA use of such assessments during special reviews of already registered pesticides; and (2) the extent to which EPA used adequate data, clarified limitations, and considered alternative pest-control measures.

GAO found that: (1) EPA primarily considers risk assessments in its reviews of already registered pesticides, and uses benefit assessments in a secondary role to help it to decide to cancel or restrict certain pesticide uses; (2) the quality of benefit assessments suffered because of poor, imprecise, or missing data, misleading analyses that do not acknowledge limitations, and incomplete analyses that do not consider promising pest-control alternatives; and (3) EPA could improve its benefits assessments by using more and better data on pesticide usage and comparative product performance, but EPA stated that it was difficult to obtain reliable data.

Oct 16, 2014

Oct 14, 2014

Sep 23, 2014

Sep 22, 2014

Sep 19, 2014

Sep 15, 2014

Sep 12, 2014

Sep 9, 2014

Aug 11, 2014

Jul 28, 2014

Looking for more? Browse all our products here