Skip to main content

Water Resources: Bonneville's Irrigation and Drainage System Is Not Economically Justified

RCED-91-73 Published: Jan 31, 1991. Publicly Released: Mar 04, 1991.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO prepared a: (1) benefit-cost analysis of the Irrigation and Drainage (I&D) system of the Central Utah Project Bonneville Unit; and (2) financial impacts analysis measuring the federal cost of not completing the I&D system.

Recommendations

Matter for Congressional Consideration

Matter Status Comments
In its deliberation on whether to complete the system, Congress will be considering other factors such as the I&D system's contribution to regional economic development. As part of its decision, Congress should consider the benefit-cost analysis and the financial implications of not completing the system.
Closed – Implemented
The Omnibus Water legislation signed by the President in October 1992 included $150 million for construction of the I&D system under the Drainage and Minor Construction Program.

Full Report

Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
Managing Director
Office of Public Affairs

Public Inquiries

Topics

Construction costsCost effectiveness analysisEconomic analysisEconomic developmentFinancial analysisProposed legislationRegional development programsWater resources developmentWater supply managementWaterway costsIrrigation