Indian Programs:

Tribal Influence in Formulating Budget Priorities Is Limited

RCED-91-20: Published: Feb 7, 1991. Publicly Released: Feb 7, 1991.

Contact:

James Duffus, III
(202) 512-7756
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Bureau of Indian Affairs' (BIA) Indian Priority System (IPS) budget formulation process, focusing on the: (1) development and implementation of the IPS process; (2) level of tribal involvement and influence in setting IPS budget priorities; (3) extent to which tribes contracted with BIA to carry out programs; and (4) concerns tribes had regarding the IPS process.

GAO found that: (1) the BIA budget has averaged about $1 billion annually over the past 10 years, with the operation of Indian programs budget component averaging about $850 million a year and the IPS process averaging about $275 million annually; (2) BIA changed various IPS programs based on administrative decisions or legislative directives without notifying area offices or tribes; (3) BIA could not explain why its current guidance provided tribes with a lesser role than earlier guidance in setting IPS budget priorities and funding levels; (4) tribal involvement in the IPS process varied depending on the tribes' relationship with BIA, changes in tribal leadership, and political situations at the tribes' reservations; (5) although tribes exercised some control over budget formulation for contracted programs, they characterized their overall IPS involvement as inconsequential; (6) tribes were particularly concerned about the lack of adequate federal funding for their needs; and (7) BIA and tribal officials often cited federal trust responsibilities as a factor limiting tribal involvement in the IPS process.

Status Legend:

More Info
  • Review Pending-GAO has not yet assessed implementation status.
  • Open-Actions to satisfy the intent of the recommendation have not been taken or are being planned, or actions that partially satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-implemented-Actions that satisfy the intent of the recommendation have been taken.
  • Closed-not implemented-While the intent of the recommendation has not been satisfied, time or circumstances have rendered the recommendation invalid.
    • Review Pending
    • Open
    • Closed - implemented
    • Closed - not implemented

    Recommendation for Executive Action

    Recommendation: The Secretary of the Interior should direct the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs to clarify the purpose of the IPS budget formulation process and the nature of tribal involvement desired in carrying out the process and communicate such clarification to BIA area and agency offices and Indian tribes. In clarifying the process, the Assistant Secretary should address the concerns expressed by tribes relating to the programs subject to the process, such as the retention of funds by area and agency offices for executive direction and administrative services.

    Agency Affected: Department of the Interior

    Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: The February 1992 report of the Joint Tribal/BIA/Interior Advisory Task Force on BIA Reorganization recommends revising the IPS budget process to increase tribal awareness of and participation in a proposed process called the Tribal Budget System. The new system is intended to address the needs and priorities of tribal governments and includes actions to address the recommendation.

    Jul 18, 2014

    Jun 23, 2014

    Jun 17, 2014

    Jun 12, 2014

    Jun 10, 2014

    May 28, 2014

    Mar 27, 2014

    Mar 6, 2014

    Feb 20, 2014

    Looking for more? Browse all our products here