Skip to main content

Agriculture: USDA Needs to Better Focus Its Water Quality Responsibilities

RCED-90-162 Published: Jul 23, 1990. Publicly Released: Aug 31, 1990.
Jump To:
Skip to Highlights

Highlights

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) management and coordination of water quality activities.

Recommendations

Recommendations for Executive Action

Agency Affected Recommendation Status
Department of Agriculture To improve the management and coordination of USDA water quality activities, the Secretary of Agriculture should clearly establish responsibility and accountability for USDA water quality efforts by creating a permanent, full-time focal point for water quality. The focal point should have a small full-time staff responsible for planning, managing, coordinating, and evaluating all USDA water quality activities and assessing those activities in light of department-wide objectives. The focal point should also coordinate USDA water quality activities with related departmental activities, such as LISA, as well as with the efforts of other federal and state government entities. Finally, the focal point should have authority to redirect or make recommendations to the Secretary to redirect USDA water quality activities, as well as have access to and support from the Secretary. To enhance the transfer of water quality information in the field, the Secretary may also want to consider the merits of establishing state or regional specialists to coordinate local water quality activities.
Closed – Implemented
The 1990 farm bill requires the Secretary of Agriculture to establish an Office of Environmental Quality with a full-time director and full-time staff.
Department of Agriculture To avoid the confusion and contradictions created by overlapping policies, the Secretary of Agriculture should develop a comprehensive policy that demonstrates the importance of water quality, regardless of the source of the contamination or the location of the water. Although current USDA activities to develop such a policy are a move in the right direction, the policy should also include the possibility of penalties to help ensure participation if voluntary efforts are not successful. A comprehensive water quality policy should also consider the interrelationship of soil, water, and other natural resources, and acknowledge the trade-offs that sometimes are necessary when designing conservation measures.
Closed – Implemented
In September 1990, USDA announced a single, comprehensive policy on water quality.
Department of Agriculture Because USDA water quality efforts could be adversely affected by some USDA activities, the Secretary of Agriculture should build on recent efforts to determine how USDA commodity, soil conservation, and other activities affect its efforts to protect water quality. Such a task should determine the types of information that farmers use when making production decisions and identify appropriate penalties and incentives to ensure that water quality activities serve both national conservation and private property interests. Such a study could be carried out by the focal point GAO recommended.
Closed – Implemented
USDA is engaged in carrying out research on this issue. Economic and technical research is assessing how commodity programs and incentives may lead to input substitution, modify chemical use, and affect chemical leaching into groundwater.

Full Report

Office of Public Affairs

Topics

Agricultural chemicalsAgricultural policiesAgricultural programsEnvironmental policiesGroundwater contaminationEnvironmental researchHealth hazardsPesticidesSoil conservationWater pollution controlWater quality