Airline Competition:

DOT's Implementation of Airline Regulatory Authority

RCED-89-93: Published: Jun 28, 1989. Publicly Released: Aug 1, 1989.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Kenneth M. Mead
(202) 512-2834
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO examined the effectiveness of the Department of Transportation's (DOT) airline oversight activities, focusing on how DOT: (1) developed and implemented its policy for approving airline mergers; and (2) protected airline passengers from unfair and deceptive trade practices.

GAO found that: (1) major changes occurred in the airline industry between 1979, when the Civil Aeronautics Board (CAB) formed its assumptions about airline contestability, and 1985, when DOT used CAB assumptions to approve mergers; (2) airlines developed such new strategies as frequent-flyer programs and computerized reservations systems to compete for business and limit new competition; (3) DOT studied the roles of potential competitors, rather than the combined effects of the new strategies on competition; (4) DOT considered such physical barriers as airports' capacity to handle take-offs and landings as the only meaningful measure of whether a merger would significantly limit competition; (5) although the DOT merger authority under the CAB Sunset Act should have expired in 1988, an act anomaly allowed DOT to continue its authority to bring administrative proceedings against airline mergers that violated antitrust laws; and (6) although the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Department of Justice continued to receive premerger notification, DOT and Justice would be the only two agencies that could stop mergers. GAO also found that: (1) DOT improved some aspects of its consumer protection functions; (2) DOT resolved almost 41,000 consumer complaints in 1987 and conducted 378 investigations in 1988 that resulted in $174,500 in fines for violations; (3) although DOT stated that a major priority of the investigative effort was to look for violation patterns, it failed to follow up on several companies' deceptive trade practices; and (4) DOT policies on deceptive advertising caused confusion and prompted state actions to establish other advertising guidelines.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed - Not Implemented

    Comments: Congress considered action, but decided not to amend the law.

    Matter: To treat airline mergers like mergers in most other industries, Congress may wish to consider amending 15 U.S.C. 21 and 45 and 49 U.S.C. 1381 to ensure that only the Department of Justice and FTC, rather than DOT, have jurisdiction over airline mergers.

Recommendations for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: DOT has stated that it believes that merger authority should reside with Justice and FTC. It has no plans to implement its residual authority. Consequently, it developed a procedure for providing Justice with its comments on proposed airline mergers or acquisitions.

    Recommendation: If Congress does not remove the statutory provisions that now give DOT authority to oppose mergers, the Secretary of Transportation should work with FTC and the Department of Justice to develop rules for reviewing premerger notifications as well as procedures for taking administrative actions against mergers that violate the antitrust laws.

    Agency Affected: Department of Transportation

  2. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: DOT met with representatives of state attorneys general (AG) to discuss consumer protection coordination. DOT followed up with letters suggesting areas for enforcement and complaint handling. DOT also maintains ongoing contact with state AG and their consumer units.

    Recommendation: To make better use of its limited resources, the Secretary of Transportation should ensure that DOT coordinates its consumer affairs functions with state offices. Such coordination could include a strategy for sharing information and coordinating rulemaking and enforcement activities with the states.

    Agency Affected: Department of Transportation

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 14, 2016

Sep 2, 2016

Aug 8, 2016

Jul 28, 2016

Jul 13, 2016

Jul 7, 2016

Jun 24, 2016

Jun 21, 2016

May 26, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here