Home Ownership:

Mortgage Bonds Are Costly and Provide Little Assistance to Those in Need

RCED-88-111: Published: Mar 28, 1988. Publicly Released: Mar 28, 1988.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

John M. Ols, Jr
(202) 512-7631
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

In response to a congressional request, GAO provided information on the role of qualified mortgage bonds in providing financing for first-time home buyers, specifically: (1) the extent to which they assisted low- and moderate-income buyers; and (2) how states are allocating issuance authority under the mandated cap.

GAO found that: (1) about two-thirds of the 177,786 buyers who received bond-assisted mortgage loans from January 1983 through June 1987 could have bought the same house at the same time without bond assistance; (2) assisted buyers generally had the same income, racial, marital, and age characteristics as non-assisted buyers; (3) although about two-thirds of the assisted buyers were part of low- or moderate-income households, their median income was similar to the median income of all first-time buyers in metropolitan areas; (4) the median reduction in assisted buyers' interest rate was 1.44 percent, or about $40 per month after taxes; (5) since bond assistance did not affect factors such as the buyer's ability to purchase the home, it did little to increase affordability; (6) recent tax reform laws narrowing the interest rate differential between tax-exempt and taxable issues will provide an even smaller increase in affordability; (7) qualified mortgage bond issuers used pre-Tax Reform Act authority to avoid cap restrictions on issuance authority; and (8) the federal tax loss was about $25 million annually for every $1 billion of bonds issued and could cost $7.8 billion from 1989 through 1993.

Matter for Congressional Consideration

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: Congress enacted three provisions as a result of a report (P.L. 100-647, sec. 4005(i)). These are: (1) tighter qualifying standards for smaller households; (2) an adjustment of the income qualifying standard for high and low cost areas; and (3) a subsidy recapture.

    Matter: If issuance authority is extended, Congress should consider including in the Internal Renvenue Code four requirements: (1) those being assisted cannot qualify to purchase the house under conventional requirements; (2) all or a portion of the subsidy should be recaptured at time of sale (based on the extent of appreciation of house price); (3) income eligibility requirements should be adjusted for the purchaser's household size; and (4) bond issuers and participating mortgage lenders should not be allowed to set aside mortgage funds for specific developers.

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Jul 13, 2016

Jun 8, 2016

May 31, 2016

May 2, 2016

Jan 8, 2016

Sep 15, 2015

Jul 23, 2015

Jul 10, 2015

Jul 6, 2015

May 19, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here