Nuclear Safety:

Comparison of DOE's Hanford N-Reactor With the Chernobyl Reactor

RCED-86-213BR: Published: Aug 5, 1986. Publicly Released: Aug 5, 1986.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO provided information on: (1) the similarities and differences in design and safety features of the Department of Energy's (DOE) N-Reactor and the Soviet Union's Chernobyl nuclear reactor; (2) the DOE program to extend the life of N-Reactor; and (3) emergency preparedness plans for N-Reactor.

GAO found that differences between N-Reactor and the Chernobyl reactor included: (1) different inherent physical responses to increases in coolant temperature; (2) N-Reactor safety systems that the Chernobyl reactor did not have; (3) N-Reactor use of a metal form of uranium fuel rather than an oxide form of uranium fuel; (4) N-Reactor using once-through emergency cooling and the Chernobyl reactor using a recirculating emergency cooling system; and (5) N-Reactor using a reactor confinement system to control steam pressures and the release of radioactive materials during an accident, while the Chernobyl reactor used a containment system. GAO also found that: (1) it would cost approximately $1.2 billion to upgrade N-Reactor for safe operation; (2) DOE has complied with 7 of 10 GAO emergency preparedness recommendations; and (3) DOE and state and local officials must jointly participate in N-Reactor site-wide emergency drills.

Sep 8, 2017

Sep 5, 2017

May 26, 2017

May 25, 2017

May 24, 2017

May 17, 2017

May 3, 2017

May 1, 2017

Apr 26, 2017

Apr 11, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here