Farm Programs:

An Analysis of Two Production Control Options

RCED-86-137: Published: Aug 11, 1986. Publicly Released: Aug 11, 1986.

Additional Materials:


Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800

Because the problem of large crop surpluses and depressed commodity prices continues to be part of the U.S. farm agenda, GAO completed a comparative analysis of the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Payment-in-Kind program (PIK) and an alternative program design for use in future farm policy and program decisions, using a private contractor's state-of-the-art policy simulation model.

GAO noted that the alternative program: (1) covered the same basic commodities as PIK; (2) would include only cash payments and would have an annual limit of $50,000 for each participating farmer; (3) would require legislative authority to enable USDA to pay farmers cash for taking land out of production; and (4) did not take into consideration the possible overall societal impact on consumers, U.S. export sales, and rural economies. GAO found that, for 1983 through 1986, the alternative program, as compared to PIK, would have resulted in: (1) $3.7 billion less in government farm program costs; (2) 47.4 million fewer acres planted in program crops; (3) a 23-percent reduction in commodity inventory levels; and (4) a $6.2-billion increase in farmers' net cash income. GAO believes that the results of the analysis underscored the need for USDA to analyze and review program alternatives before committing to major program changes like PIK.

Jun 9, 2016

May 26, 2016

May 19, 2016

Apr 14, 2016

Jan 14, 2016

Jan 8, 2016

Jul 9, 2015

Jun 18, 2015

May 26, 2015

May 20, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here