Rural Cooperatives:

Information on Two Rural Electrification Administration Proposals

RCED-86-101: Published: May 30, 1986. Publicly Released: May 30, 1986.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO obtained information on: (1) the advantages and disadvantages of the Rural Electrification Administration's (REA) engineering standards proposal; and (2) the basis for and potential impacts of the REA proposal to revise its loan approval criteria.

GAO found that: (1) advantages of REA performing its standards-setting function included lower facilities construction costs, greater security for REA loans, and increased efficiency for materials and equipment manufacturers; (2) one disadvantage was that the government, rather than the consumer, would bear the cost of the standards-setting function; (3) three out of five private organizations surveyed were unwilling to develop and maintain engineering standards for rural utility cooperatives; (4) revised loan approval criteria would provide a better measure of cooperatives' available funds to meet financing needs; (5) approximately 70 percent of the REA electric distribution cooperatives would not qualify initially for loan advances under the proposed criteria; (6) REA estimated that many cooperatives would again be eligible for loans within a year; and (7) the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association believes many cooperatives would permanently lose their eligibility for REA funds and turn to non-REA financing of construction projects.

Oct 23, 2014

Jul 29, 2014

Jun 6, 2014

May 14, 2014

May 9, 2014

Feb 6, 2014

Jan 22, 2014

Jan 15, 2014

Sep 18, 2013

Looking for more? Browse all our products here