The Role of Marketing Orders in Establishing and Maintaining Orderly Marketing Conditions

RCED-85-57: Published: Jul 31, 1985. Publicly Released: Jul 31, 1985.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Brian P. Crowley
(202) 512-9450
contact@gao.gov

 

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

GAO reviewed 9 marketing orders covering 11 agricultural commodities to: (1) address controversies surrounding the marketing order program and the effect of each individual type of marketing order tool on commodity supplies; (2) determine emerging trends in the use of marketing orders; and (3) assess the Agricultural Marketing Service's (AMS) administration of the marketing order program. Under the program, AMS helps commodity producers collectively work out solutions to supply and demand problems that individual producers are unable to resolve.

Critics of marketing orders contend that: (1) economic efficiency is enhanced when commodity prices and availability are determined in competitive markets; and (2) marketing orders undermine efficiency by artificially and excessively raising commodity prices higher than a free market would allow. Proponents of marketing orders argue that they reduce supply imbalances for perishable commodities in markets that are volatile if unregulated. GAO found that: (1) the marketing orders for hops and spearmint oil restrict new growers from entering the marketplace, and the marketing order for lemons typically results in waste; (2) while most marketing orders regulate the entry of products into the market, both producers and consumers benefit from the restrictions; (3) controls governing the quality of commodities encourage producers to improve products and assure consumers that their products meet minimum quality standards; (4) for 10 of the 11 commodities studied, competitive forces are sufficient to limit price increases; and (5) the current trend in marketing order operations is a shift from controlling supply to enhancing demand using a mixture of research, development, and advertising tools. In addition, GAO found that: (1) AMS plays a limited role in industry education; (2) the program operations manual for marketing orders has not been updated since 1966 and does not address the shift to marketing orders designed to enhance demand; and (3) AMS has no criteria to measure marketing system performance.

Recommendations for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: A criteria development task force, made up of five university agricultural economists, was established in May 1986. The team developed draft criteria and held meetings around the country to obtain industry input. A report to the Administrator, AMS, entitled Criteria for Evaluating Marketing Orders: Fruits, Vegetables, Nuts, and Specialty Commodities, was published in December 1986.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should require the Administrator, AMS, to develop and apply criteria for measuring the performance of individual marketing orders and make the results available so that Department of Agriculture (USDA) decisionmakers and other interested parties can appropriately judge the merits and shortcomings of marketing orders.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

  2. Status: Closed - Implemented

    Comments: USDA issued a request for proposals (RFP) in March 1986 to update its Marketing Order Operations Manual. The manual was completed in 1987.

    Recommendation: The Secretary of Agriculture should direct the Administrator, AMS, to update and keep current the operations manual for marketing orders. The manual should: (1) incorporate the criteria for measuring the program's principal objective of creating and maintaining orderly marketing; (2) incorporate legislative and administrative policy and guideline changes, including 1982 and 1983 marketing order guidelines; and (3) focus on ways to develop market-oriented programs that can improve the quality and variety of available products.

    Agency Affected: Department of Agriculture

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Jun 9, 2016

May 26, 2016

May 19, 2016

Apr 14, 2016

Jan 14, 2016

Jan 8, 2016

Jul 9, 2015

Jun 18, 2015

May 26, 2015

May 20, 2015

Looking for more? Browse all our products here