Department of Defense Should Resolve Major Issues Regarding Reengining the KC-135 Aircraft Before Continuing the Program

PSAD-80-80: Published: Sep 23, 1980. Publicly Released: Sep 23, 1980.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

A review was undertaken of the Air Force's KC-135 tanker aircraft reengining modification program. The reengining modification is a complex effort involving extensive development and testing that will reportedly provide several benefits. These include increasing KC-135 survivability, safety, fuel efficiency, and fuel off-load capability. The reengined KC-135 will also be quieter and produce fewer pollutants. The purpose of the review was to determine the program's status and to identify unresolved pertinent issues. The issues addressed included questions concerning the program's pace, cost effectiveness, need, and affordability.

The GAO review of the Air Force's KC-135 tanker aircraft reengining modification program showed that the primary reason for reengining the KC-135 is the need for additional aerial tanker off-load capability. Although the program is in the early stages of full-scale development and meets all the criteria of a major system acquisition, it has not been designated a major system and subjected to review by the Defense System Acquisition Review Council (DSARC). A review by DSARC is particularly critical at this time because of Air Force plans to award contracts, totaling about $140 million, for the initial effort to modify the first KC-135 aircraft and to complete research and development. Further, while a mission element needs statement has been prepared for the program, it has not yet been approved by the Office of the Secretary of Defense.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation: To avoid the possibility of continuing to develop a system which may not be needed, affordable, or the most cost-effective alternative, the Secretary of Defense should direct DSARC to review the program to answer the basic questions concerning the program. Further, the Secretary should direct the Air Force to withhold its planned October 1980 contract awards until DSARC has completed its review.

    Agency Affected:

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 19, 2016

Sep 12, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Sep 6, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here