Should the Navy Reverse McDonnell Douglas Corporation's Award to the F-18 Ejection Seat Contract?

PSAD-77-99: Published: Apr 11, 1977. Publicly Released: Apr 11, 1977.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

The F-18 aircraft prime contractor, McDonnell Douglas Corporation, awarded subcontract to Martin-Baker Ltd. (M-B) a British firm, to develop the ejection seat for the F-18 aircraft, reversing the original intention to buy the seats from the Stencel Aero Engineering Corporation of Asheville, North Carolina.

The basis of the award was questionable and it may not have been in the best interest of the government. McDonnell's evaluation of procurement offers found Stencel Corporation's seat to be technically superior, but M-B was selected for the lower price. M-B was granted deviations from specifications in five important areas, and its seat will require a 40-percent redesign, as opposed to 15 percent for Stencel. M-B's lower price for development will be more than offset by increased support costs. In the past, M-B also refused to provide adequate cost data or allow audits.

Recommendation for Executive Action

  1. Status: Closed

    Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.

    Recommendation: The Navy should reexamine this procurement. Specifically, it should conduct an independent technical evaluation and a comprehensive life cycle cost analysis of the two proposals. Attention should be paid to the waivers given M-B that relate to the aircraft mission and safety of the crew, especially ejection height and stability after ejection. Past difficulties in getting M-B data should be considered, and also the need for a domestic source for this item.

    Agency Affected:

 

Explore the full database of GAO's Open Recommendations »

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 19, 2016

Sep 12, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Sep 6, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here