Intensive Probation Supervision:

Crime-Control and Cost-Saving Effectiveness

PEMD-93-23: Published: Jun 4, 1993. Publicly Released: Jul 13, 1993.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

GAO reviewed intensive probation supervision (IPS) programs in Arizona to determine: (1) how well the IPS program controlled criminal behavior; and (2) whether the program was a cost-saving alternative to incarceration.

GAO found that: (1) the percentages of IPS offenders arrested while supervised by IPS were below those for offenders sentenced to standard probation; (2) in Pima County, equivalent percentages of IPS offenders and probationers were arrested for new crimes; (3) IPS was relatively effective in controlling crime when offenders were under direct supervision; (4) the cost of sentencing offenders to IPS was lower than the cost of sentencing offenders to prison; (5) despite the mix of offenders supervised by the program, county IPS programs represented cost-saving alternatives to incarceration in terms of direct operating costs; and (6) Arizona's IPS program reduced criminal activity and direct costs, but additional requirements could make total costs for IPS greater than those for incarceration.

Oct 12, 2017

Sep 26, 2017

Sep 7, 2017

Jul 31, 2017

Jul 26, 2017

Jul 24, 2017

Jun 28, 2017

Apr 26, 2017

Looking for more? Browse all our products here