Triad Summary

PEMD-92-36R: Published: Sep 28, 1992. Publicly Released: Sep 28, 1992.

Additional Materials:

Contact:

Office of Public Affairs
(202) 512-4800
youngc1@gao.gov

Pursuant to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the U.S. strategic defense triad, focusing on the: (1) strengths and weaknesses of major modernization programs; (2) programs' cost-effectiveness; and (3) future of arms control and U.S. strategic capabilities. GAO found that: (1) disparities exist between estimates and realities of triad defense systems; (2) triad's sea leg is the most cost-effective; (3) the speed and reliability of communications to submerged missile launch sites is equal to communications to land-based intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM) silos; (4) the accuracy, reliability, and warhead yield of the Navy's Trident II missile equals that of the Peacekeeper missiles, and the Trident is more cost-effective and nearly invulnerable to attack; (5) the Soviet threats and air defense systems which justified the procurement of the B-2 bomber, were greatly overestimated; (6) each B-2 bomber's procurement cost totals $2 billion; (7) B-52 bombers have only reached half of their structural life expectancies and compare favorably in cruise missile delivery and radar penetration capability; (8) the superiority of the advanced cruise missile's range over the present air-launched cruise missile is negligible; (9) the vulnerability of silo-based ICBM was greatly overstated because of overstated Soviet missile accuracy, yield, and reliability; (10) Peacekeeper and Minuteman accuracy projections could be overstated because of limited testing; and (11) due to the reduced nuclear threat and U.S.-Soviet arms control agreements, the United States has reduced its missile inventory, hard-target kill capability requirements, and total warheads.

Sep 22, 2016

Sep 21, 2016

Sep 19, 2016

Sep 12, 2016

Sep 8, 2016

Sep 7, 2016

Sep 6, 2016

Aug 25, 2016

Looking for more? Browse all our products here