Effectiveness and Costs
PAD-78-4: Published: Feb 6, 1978. Publicly Released: Feb 6, 1978.
- Full Report:
In 1976, 63.8 percent of murders, 23.6 percent of aggravated assaults, and 42.7 percent of robberies in the United States were committed with guns. Over the past 10 years the use of guns in crime has increased greatly. Three major Federal laws have controlled the sale and possession of firearms: the National Firearms Act of 1934, the Federal Firearms Act of 1938, and the Gun Control Act of 1968.
There has been a direct relationship between increased handgun availability and increased gun-related crimes in America since the mid-sixties. The Gun Control Act was an attempt to remove inexpensive handguns from the market by restricting imports; it also attempted to aid State and local law enforcement by requiring gun purchasers to be State residents and prohibiting some people from buying guns. However, since it does not require verification of a purchaser's identity, it is not effective in deterring people with criminal records from acquiring guns. State and local laws affecting handguns consist of a patchwork of statutes and requirements, with State laws effective only within State lines and a lack of uniformity among States. Other attempts to curb gun-related crimes have been the enactment by some States of mandatory sentencing for crimes committed with guns and a Federal enforcement project. The effectiveness of these and other approaches has not been clearly established. It is difficult to estimate the cost of a national gun control system because there is no definitive design for such a system. Costs would depend on requirements and needs for personnel. Savings would result from integrating some State gun control systems into a national system.
Matter for Congressional Consideration
Comments: Please call 202/512-6100 for additional information.
Matter: Congress should consider a national gun control system from a range of system designs and select a system which is most cost effective. Alternatives should include use of existing State systems. Consideration should also be given to: verifying an individual's identity and lack of criminal background in order to purchase or possess a handgun, examination of mandatory sentencing, and provisions for periodic evaluations.